Hi Corgimations! I noticed your contributions to Heidelberg University shooting and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Dunutubble (talk) 23:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cjse23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2008–09 Australian region cyclone season, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cjse23 (talk) 04:32, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do believe that you made a mistake as the old system of using names from three separate lists from the different branches of the BoM (Darwin, Perth, and Brisbane) was discontinued as notably shown by how Anika was the season uses the modern list of names shown, whereas seasons before it often reference three different lists and when checking the history of the tropical cyclone naming page, you can clearly see that before the 2008-09 season, it shows three lists. I don't believe a source is necessary considering it is quite easily evident, however if you would like me to provide a source regardless, I will try my best to find one. :) I'm more just surprised how quickly you responded since I made the edit a minute ago, unless this message is automatically generated. Thanks for letting me know regardless :) Corgimations (talk) 04:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lunala 62. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2023 Pacific hurricane season, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 🌀Lunala 62🌀 (talk) 20:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lunala 62 This seems inappropriate that you remind a user that made a mistake they made over 2 weeks prior. I had to scroll through the edit history for December 30, but found nothing and had to go back for nearly 2 weeks to find the unsourced info @Corgimations put. 🍙🌀CycloneIns✉ 07:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, and all it was was that I had added some trivia which is common knowledge and in my opinion doesn't require a citation, since it's easily noticeable that 2023 is by far the costliest season on record. Corgimations (talk) 08:59, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Corgimations, regarding your edit to 1984 Soviet Union tornado outbreak and future edits, it would be beneficial to editors if you can briefly explain your changes in the edit summary before publishing. Especially a major edit like the one you just did; upon first glance I thought it was a disruptive and unexplained removal (the second part is correct). Do everyone a favor as well: when you remove a bad reference, replace it with a ^{[citation needed]} tag, it lets fellow editors know the information has to be verified with a reliable source. Cheers. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 00:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, I was removing a link which I thought was unnecessary but I probably accidentally removed something else along with it. Apologies Corgimations (talk) 01:54, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:VoepassCrash.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not update information on Wikipedia from the ATCF, like you did here . Please use the advisories on the public-facing website; they sometimes differ from what's in the ATCF file. Jasper Deng (talk) 02:20, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Great work on Typhoons in Japan! I was wondering when someone would try making that list. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Glad someone noticed it haha Corgimations (talk) 22:40, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 04:49, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]