Hello, Clintoncimring and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Red Director (talk) 01:29, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samantha dishman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha dishman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Comatmebro (talk) 16:53, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have a number of other accounts it appears User:ClintonCimring and User:Janbellows

You appear to be only here to promote yourself. As such I have removed your ability to edit. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clintoncimring (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

No idea who or what Janbellows is. The last post was from that account was from 9 years ago. I am allowed as many accounts as I wish provided they are used for legitimate purposes. However, I do not have any other accounts. Your block does not excuse the fact that your moving a page to the draftspace was inappropriate and a violation of Wikipedia Policies and guidelines as I mentioned on your talk page. My relation with that subject is that I am the Executive Director of the organization appointed by the Board of Directors who resolved in a Board Meeting yesterday for me to reply to you on their behalf in response to your actions. Clintoncimring (talk) 00:33, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please read and heed WP:PAID and WP:COI. If you have a problem with the content of an article about a living person, see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Help. We have little interest in the opinions of Boards of Directors. If you are here to protest the removal of promotional material, we are not a promotional venue.00:57, 12 July 2019 (UTC)  Dlohcierekim (talk)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clintoncimring (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Upon further investigation I see that Janbellows created a biographical page under my name 10 years ago. That has nothing to do with my personally or this page as an editor. That page can be found here and can be totally deleted for all I care Clinton Cimring. You will notice that I have never made any edits to the page Clintoncimring Clintoncimring (talk) 01:36, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a venue to promote yourself and your endeavors. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:31, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been trying to use Wikipedia for more than 10 years to promote yourself and your projects. You received a great deal of guidance here on your other talk page.[1]

What is your relation to this account User:Educationneverends? You / your organization appear to be using a lot of accounts. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:51, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James Considering I did not create my first account until 2018 I respectfully disagree with your assertionClintoncimring (talk) 00:56, 12 July 2019 (UTC).[reply]

@Doc James No idea what User:Educationneverends is. You would have to reach out to that user Clintoncimring (talk) 00:57, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article Clinton Cimring is deleted and salted for a reason. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James I would look into the IP Addresses associated with whoever worked on that article if you have an issue with it and really has nothing to do with you suspending my personal page as an editor. I am in the USA - just food for thought... Clintoncimring (talk) 01:12, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clintoncimring (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not promoting myself nor do I have any interest in doing so. I am a Law Professor at UM. To reiterate, I did not create any articles under my name nor did I have an account prior to 2018. None of the edits I have made are self-promotion in any way. Therefore, the block is clearly inappropriate. Clintoncimring (talk) 21:08, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Bullshit. I am withdrawing your ability to make further appeals due to your dishonesty. MER-C 10:43, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ah. 1) This account here was active in 2017 2) Are you claiming you have no relation to the Salty Dog Paddle?[2] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:09, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Clintoncimring. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Samantha Dishman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 21:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]