Done. The page has been moved to Draft:Deepak Sharma. Primefac (talk) 19:31, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello , I dont understand on what basis u have added a deletion nomination to the page Nucleus Premium Properties Private ltd. Nucleus is a very famous builder in South India and has got lot of newslinks associated with them and prominent name in Construction Industry . May i know what are the flaws in the page .

Thanks .

User:Wikikings, I have not nominated Nucleus Premium Properties Private ltd.. I just revert your edits, where you deleted the earlier AFD tag without this discussion being completed. I see that you have again deleted the AFD tag, this will have no affect on the AFD discussion. If the AFD nomination sustains on the deletion entry, the article may still be deleted. I suggest you please make arguemnts against the nomination here

Please can you stop overly promoting the AAP candidates in the forthcoming elections. You need to ensure that the information is reliably sourced and that the positioning of it in an article's lead section reflects the things for which the person is most notable. As a general rule, candidacy is not their most notable aspect - if it was then the chances are high that the article would not exist anyway. Should these people get elected then, yes, their status as a member of the Lok Sabha would likely be the most notable thing but until then ... - Sitush (talk) 22:21, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Dear User, You are making similar type of edits in the Lead section of the Articles. Please make your edits in proper sections as per the suitability.--Mohit Singh (talk) 20:31, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

regarding File:Deepak Sharma Journalist.jpg, it cannot be "permission to use on Wikipedia" it must be a "free use for everyone" license. see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:33, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

OK User:TheRedPenOfDoom I guess, I will delete and get proper permissions from him.

Thanks for uploading File:Deepak Sharma Journalist.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 18:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi ChunnuBhai. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Bhakt, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! Favonian (talk) 09:55, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Prashant Bhushan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, ChunnuBhai. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Deepak Sharma".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:11, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I received your message that the page referenced above has been tagged for deletion. Couple questions: 1. The message says that I can go to the page and use the Contest This Speedy Deletion. I do not see such a link. Could you further describe where I can find it?

2. I'm the original author of the page but others seem to have added to the page since. Would you please describe further what portion of the content is objectionable? I would like to improve the page, but I really don't think this historical family's page should be entirely deleted!

Thanks. 03:15, 15 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsshergill (talk • contribs)

Hi, thanks for your comment on Talk:Umar Khalid. Please feel free to close the off-topic discussion. It should normally be done by uninvolved editors. You have a clean record, so nobody will mind. If you don't know how, please see the instructions at template:Archive top. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kautilya3 (talk • contribs)

This is regarding your remarks on the above article. Do note I did not create that article. Please find out who did and mark your remarks to that person.--PremKudva^Talk 10:52, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello, ChunnuBhai. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi ChunnuBhai, I couldn't tell from the edit history what the disputes are. I don't have too much time to spare at this point. There seem to be socks and unregistered users operating. If the situation persists, you can request for temporary semi-protection at WP:RfPP. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 09:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello. I noticed you added a script that I had made to User:ChunnuBhai/common.js. It seems you have added more than the required part of the script. I would suggest undoing that edit. To install the page curation script, simply copy the following into your common.js page.

importScript('User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js'); // Linkback: User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js

Note: You will need to manually bypass your cache after installation. Visit Wikipedia:Bypass your cache to see how to do this.

Thanks. Lourdes 09:58, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

• Hi. Just dropped in to check if you read my above message. Do ping me if there's any confusion. Basically, all you need to copy to User:ChunnuBhai/common.js is the below mentioned line:

importScript('User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js'); // Linkback: [[User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js]]

You can delete the following lines from your User:ChunnuBhai/common.js page.

$( document ).ready( function() {
mw.util.addPortletLink(
'p-personal',
 mw.util.wikiGetlink('Special:NewPagesFeed'),
   'Page Curation',
   'pt-pagecuration',
   'View Special:New Pages using the Page Curation tool',
   null,
   '#pt-preferences'
 );
});

Like I said, if there's any clarification required, don't hesitate to ping me up. Thanks. Lourdes 02:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi thanks for pointing this out. Please check and see if what I wrote is correct. ChunnuBhai (talk) 04:49, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

That's perfect. Well done. Thanks. Lourdes 05:32, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

चुन्नू जी, हमने देखा है की आप अंग्रेजी विकिपीडिया पर काफी लिखते हैं , जो की अच्छा है। पर नए नियम के अन्तर्गत आपको अपना १० प्रतिशत कार्य हिंदी में करना होगा , ताकि भारत को साक्षर और समझदार बनाने में आप अपना योगदान दे सकें । हिंदी में लिखने के लिए आप " google input tools " का इस्तेमाल कर सकते हैं, और दिक्कत होने पर मेरे टॉक पेज पर सन्देश छोड़ सकते हैं । GhaniBhai (talk) 13:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

New rules? Where? I am not well versed in Hindi. ChunnuBhai (talk) 16:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.

See also WP:COI in case it might apply. --Ronz (talk) 15:52, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Programs renamed by Modi Government shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Razer^{Text me} 07:54, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Hey I noticed that you left me a message on my talk page. I'll like to tell you that you too are removing articles from that page. Please desist from that. Also we may have difference of opinion about the existence of a page, but please respect others opinion about it and do not remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasd000 (talk • contribs) 08:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC) Razer2115. Please desist from removing material from a new article. please use citation needed tag instead. ChunnuBhai (talk) 08:08, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

If you delete, remove or modify any posts made by other editors in any AfD page you will immediately be blocked from editing here. You are entitled to hold your own views, but you are not entitled to subvert Wikipedia procedure to promote them. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 09:38, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello User:Anthony.bradbury. I have not modified or deleted any votes or comments in AFDs. Instead , my own comments were replaced by an editor in the AFD you may be referring to. I just reinstated my comments. Please recheck and request you to withdraw this warning. ChunnuBhai (talk) 09:45, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Harsh (talk) 12:17, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello, ChunnuBhai. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, ChunnuBhai. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, ChunnuBhai. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 18:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--RegentsPark (comment) 20:58, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Swati Maliwal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AAP. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Explain your reason for my edits Dolphinseeds (talk) 04:30, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

• Resolved on Talk:2020_Hathras_gang_rape_and_murderChunnuBhai (talk) 05:32, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing at Manipur State Constitution Act 1947 shows that you are currently engaging in edit war,read WP:RS.if you repeatedly vandalise wikipedia you will be reported to Adminsꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 14:30, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello @Luwanglinux:, I have left a message on Talk:Manipur State Constitution Act 1947 to discuss this. I do not think I am engaging in WP:EW. I had cited proper reference while editing the article. If you think my edit is not worthy of being added to the artile, please discuss on the talk page. ChunnuBhai (talk) 14:33, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

@ChunnuBhai: you should not add unrelated topic to an article about law and constitution.But,Thank you for pointing out Manipuri Merger agreement included in earlier edit,I have removed that btoo.The articleManipur State Constitution Act 1947 is purely about legal law and constitution.Controversal content should not be added.Thanksꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ)

Please dont unilaterally revert my edits without WP:CONSENSUS on talk page. Perhaps wait for other editors to contribute to the discussion ChunnuBhai (talk) 16:33, 29 October 2020 (UTC)