Archives

1

Stop vandalising content with unrelated topic and category you will be reported if you violate the WP:3RRꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 15:17, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moved the discussion to Talk:Manipur State Constitution Act 1947. WP:THREATEN not appreciated. ChunnuBhai (talk) 18:32, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can contribute to wikipedia on any article you have knowledge of provided you follow WP:NPOV and enough stop personal attack on fellow editors WP:NPA,Thanksꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 16:15, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Luwanglinux Request to show me a single edit where I have made any personal attack on any fellow editor.ChunnuBhai (talk) 16:51, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With due respect I tagged them as own work because its my own work indeed ,does every similar picture be in the category of copyright violation,You keep digging every article I contribute and try so hard to find fault in those article as if you have no job of your own or acting as wiki inspector.Isn't it violation of WP:NPA.And just because you find some similarity in the words of article from sources mentioned you keep tagging copyright violation wah wahhh...what a job thank youꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 05:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Luwanglinux,

• The images are EXACTLY same, pixel by pixel. not just visually similar.
• WP:COPYVIO are taken very seriously because it can cause legal issues for Wikipedia Foundation itself. A lot of money from donations received from donors like us, goes into legal fees of lawyers, just to keep wikipedia running.
• Tagging articles for potential issues, like copyright violations does not constitute WP:NPA, infact it is an important responsibility of every editor.
• You can check the similarity of you contributions with the sources you have used using this tool [1]. Just put in appropriate pages and sources in the input box. You will find, its not just similarity, but outright copy paste job. ChunnuBhai (talk) 05:46, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ChunnuBhai: what a derogatory claim the RGB composition do not even match with the website you purpose as copied source similar pixel by pixel huh.ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 09:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop acting like some pain will you consider reading history of edit too.the remaining words of the article are in my own words even if the idea is same with the source and link provided.ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 07:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Luwanglinux, please see [2] . the entire article is just copy paste of 2 paragraphs from the e-pao.net website. ChunnuBhai (talk) 07:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It only carry the same meaning word by word is not 100% similar,can you write a historical background of an actual event in different version,you are too muchꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 07:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Luwanglinux, Thats not how you address copyright violations by changing few words in the middle. ChunnuBhai (talk) 07:44, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am so done with you I will wait for administrator to decide you act as if no other editor had warned you,I check many article with copyvio toll atleast 50% is similar with many sources.I am not like you I don't need to dig your weak point.I can clearly see your motive.byeꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ (ꯆꯥ) 07:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ChunnuBhai Why made you to nominate this article for deletion.There are many citations in the article.In the mean time ,I can add more citations.The film is a small - budgeted one and not yet released. So, I cannot add more information.If people like you make such things, we cannot create new articles.There is no freedom for people like us to created articles with good quality.If you wish, you can improve the article rather making such annoying things.This article is related to cinema.So if any other person create the article regarding the same topic, will you nominate even that for deletion! Kindly please remove it from the nominations for deletion.ChunnuBhai (talk) 07:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

you can discuss why you think the article should be included on wikipedia here Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Maa_Vintha_Gadha_Vinuma ChunnuBhai (talk) 14:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you revert that i have deleted. Look its wrong, he didn't worked for missionary of charity. It was wrong information. Rock200514 (talk) 08:00, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rock200514, I have added one more source that mentions Arvind Kejriwal working for Missionaries of Charity. The information is properly sourced from multiple sources. Please open WP:RfC at Talk:Arvind Kejriwal if you want this to be edited. ChunnuBhai (talk) 08:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bro these information are not at all necessary in his wikipedia Rock200514 (talk) 09:00, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rock200514, I think its not correct to remove this information. Quite a few BLP articles mention such details in 'Early Life' sections. If you feel this information should be removed, Please open WP:RfC on the talk page, and let other editors also comment and let WP:CONSENSUS emerge. ChunnuBhai (talk) 09:04, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please, how to add this Rock200514 (talk) 09:28, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rfc Rock200514 (talk) 09:28, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arvanid kejriwal follows hindusim, can please add that,https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/i-m-a-devout-hindu-not-what-bjp-is-portraying-kejriwal/story-egWUR9yTWCYTREzAWAmqoM.html Rock200514 (talk) 10:05, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rock200514, You can read this WP:RFCOPEN in detail to understand what RfC is and how to open a new RfC on talk page of the article. ChunnuBhai (talk) 11:10, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will do that but can you please add what i have said above about his religion Rock200514 (talk) 12:01, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of political families in Indian cricket administration is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of political families in Indian cricket administration until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – PeeJay 14:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Yellow Revolution (India), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:00, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review of Janta Ka Reporter. I know the sources are not the best, but I have lower standards for publications than I do for other topics. I would not cite these kinds of sources for something which is itself not a source. Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:28, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:55, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am new on Wikipedia and I really do not know the intricacies of editing and need help. Could you please guide me in editing pages, including the ones that I have spoken about. Thank you. YoYoRockNRoll (talk) 06:15, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

YoYoRockNRoll, you are not new to wikipedia JoJo ChunnuBhai (talk) 06:17, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Who is JoJo? I really do not know properly how to edit Wikipedia pages. Please help or recommend someone. YoYoRockNRoll (talk) 06:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I left a note for you on the article talk page. Thanks! Vikram Vincent 13:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to Wikipedia editing. Can you please check my edit to the article on Godi Media? Any feedback/correction would be more than welcome. Iamyourfriend108 (talk) 16:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ChunnuBhai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rohini Singh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ChunnuBhai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rohini Singh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! The Sokks💕 ^_(talk) 22:19, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ChunnuBhai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yellow Revolution (India), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ChunnuBhai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yellow Revolution".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:06, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid reverting without giving proper edit summary as you did at NDTVSatdul (talk) 17:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Satdul (talk) 06:56, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for informing ChunnuBhai (talk) 09:57, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Prashant Bhushan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]