I understand your reasoning behind moving the Combined Cadet Force Naval Ranks can I ensure that the lolly-pop like rank slide is not Under Officer, I can completely understand your thinking behind it.

Thank you Cdjp1. C. D. Southcott Esq. (talk)

Hi Cdjp1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Nicaraguan Air Force page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cdjp1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My reasoning for removing the Brazilian MP ranks, is that they are exactly the same ranks as the army ranks and don't contribute to anything new.Skjoldbro (talk) 10:32, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You kinda could, but the USCG is a part of the US armed forces as a branch, whereas the Brazilian MPs only are an auxiliary force inside the Army. Skjoldbro (talk) 18:38, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Port Campus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable collection of buildings

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 14:26, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!Timothy Titus ^{Talk To TT} 00:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following addition to the defined and established term of "Facism" has been incorrectly entered.

Fascism has nothing to do with Right Wing or "Far Right" political views. This is purely and only a Liberal, Far Left idea and not a true definition of the term. This is false reporting.

PLEASE REMOVE: Opposed to liberalism, Marxism and anarchism, fascism is usually placed on the far-right within the traditional left–right spectrum.[5][6]

Roger Griffin's ideas of modern fascism are not at all true to the actual term and are therefore a mere Far Left political opinion which Wikipedia should not accept as part of the actual definition of "Fascism."

Aristotle Kallis is also a Far Left political ideologists whose comments in his books have been allowed to incorrectly add a defining line of true and accurate defining of a term, in this case the term "Fascism."

The line being requested to be removed is not valid and purely a Far Left ideology of what the think of the "Far Right." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rcadow (talk • contribs) 00:03, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the statement above. Please allow for the changes requested Drakemor (talk) 16:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Air Training Corps crest.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:45, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very many thanks for the barnstar. Dormskirk (talk) 12:49, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your efforts on various military ranks issues. I would like you to find and add a specific source for Liberia's military ranks, former and current, before you readd the data, however. I try to keep that page well sourced. I'm not aware of such an accessible source so if you find one that would be great!! Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 19:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou, but you don't appear to understand: nobody reads the AFL article and then automatically comes to my talkpage to know the source of the data!! Add the source to the page, using proper referencing footnotes. Otherwise I will remove the entire section. Buckshot06 (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good. I'm not sure whether I was using a cached copy or reverting to the version that I initially saw, because I did not see that ref. The page number needs to be added, but unfortunately the diagrams with the ranks are not shown in the New National Defence Act 2008. I'm going to remove the diagrams. If you find a source which shows all the diagrams - avoiding WP:SYNTH by pasting from different pages - you can readd them. Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 20:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For your helpful addition at École de l'air Buckshot06 (talk) 19:31, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cdjp1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Paweł Dembowski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GimliDotNet (talk) 20:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kaiserschützen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyrolean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Service de police de la Ville de Montréal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Director

Tyrolean Mountain Guards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Auxiliary

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you please add your sources to École militaire de l'air. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 09:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And General Directorate for Security. Boleyn (talk) 21:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Tyrolean Mountain Guards, Cdjp1!

Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

To reply, leave a comment on Abishe's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Abishe (talk) 17:26, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Midlands Aerospace Alliance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence fo notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 06:05, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Falkland Islands Defence Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Escutcheon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sibanye Heritage Rangers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sibanye Heritage Rangers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbarmadillo (talk) 07:40, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Air Training Corps crest.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:01, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Maschinenfabrik Reinhausen, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:22, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
• updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm concerned about over tagging on these. Many of them have no military relation. Chepstow Port Wall isn't obvious, but some walls are just tax measures, not military fortifications - when Chepstow was besieged, the attackers walked right through the town walls and stopped at the castle walls. Box Tunnel though is ridiculous. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:20, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on History of Sea Cadets in the UK requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.tsquantock.com/index1-scchistory.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 05:51, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Maschinenfabrik Reinhausen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kb.au (talk) 02:19, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded this barnstar for your efforts during the April 2018 MILHIST Backlog Drive. Thank you for your contributions. AustralianRupert (talk) 09:32, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Bronze Wiki
		For placing third in the April 2018 MILHIST Backlog Drive, you are hereby awarded the Bronze Wiki. Thank you for your efforts. For the co-ordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:32, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Radical Party (UK) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable: only coverage is routine election coverage around one by-election

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bondegezou (talk) 16:00, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal Belgian Sea Cadet Corps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Recruit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Navy League Cadet Officers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Navy League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Left Communists (Weimar Republic).

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please WP:INLINECITE your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 17:30, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maglód, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Zombor and Gyula (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cdjp1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cornish language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hilary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Police cadets in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PCSO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Suomen Poikien ja Tyttöjen Keskus.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Given the article's description of the extent of the subject's activities, I suspect that it likely is notable. However, the sources provided in the article are insufficient for demonstrating notability, and I was unable to find more online (partly due to my lack of familiarity with Finnish sources)

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:12, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Piera Gatteschi Fondelli, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Silika. O. Silika ^{talk} 10:54, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CVQO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BTEC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:39, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your thanks and contributions to the article!Tewdar (talk) 09:30, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you for my barnstar! Tewdar (talk) 22:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fähnrichschüler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry for State Security (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history service award
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded these stripes for your efforts during the Backlog Banzai. Thank you for your contributions. Gog the Mild (talk) 10:37, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cdjp1. You have new messages at Talk:Army Cadet Force#Rank table.
Message added 14:42, 16 October 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Praetorian65 (talk) 14:42, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bambu (rapper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Common (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]