---

---

Home	Talk	Pages	Commons	Wikisource

---

---

Archives

Archive 1

Hi Cakelot1. Thank you for your work on Flag of Exmoor. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Killing of Laken Riley.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Gottagotospace (talk) 22:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cakelot1/Bar I was disappointed by your edit. You do a disservice to readers by omitting a summary of the BBC File on 4, and excluding errors made in the report. You do a disservice to everyone with these chronic conditions by ommitting the recovery story alongside the stories of people who didn't get change. There are many of these recovery stories in the press and research which are being frequently ignored. The rapid recovery stories are important as they show that there is a system capable of rapid change involved in at least some people alongside other physical issues identified by research. This needs to be researched as part of the process of understanding and for developing medications for helping people to recover from this condition/group of conditions. Unfortunately almost no research has been happening into how patients are recovering. Verity Verity&Science1 (talk) 08:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Verity&Science1, Wikipedia articles are based on reliable sources not on our own feelings. As I said in my edit summary, you've inserted a load of WP:FRINGE WP:OR and WP:SYNTH (each on of those links is to a Policies and/or guideline that I recommend you read). We arn't here to write an original essay rebutting the points of a program (where such rebuttals aren't present in the sources). For example where is the claim that the program was controversial supported by a reliable source. Additionally, as this is a medical topic the higher standard of WP:MEDRES also applies. I intend to bring this to the WP:FTN as fringe medical theories is not an area I edit much. I will also open a section on the talk page so it can be discussed more widely. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 15:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cakelot1. Thank you for your work on Scoria brick. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 65, September – October 2024

• Hindu Tamil Thisai joins The Wikipedia Library
• Frankfurt Book Fair 2024 report
• Tech tip: Mass downloads

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]