Hello CWO! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on , or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Dylan Lake 20:23, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

The problem is explained in my contributions on the status of a translation earlier this evening (26 October 2006).

I can't work out whether I should just go ahead and then immediately apply for page protection, or whether one should not in the first place create pages one knows are going to need protection.CWO 22:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If it's an encyclopedic topic, you should create it. It being protected on the German Wikipedia does not mean it will have to be protected here, but if there is recurrent vandalism, then request protection. Also, the page on the German Wikipedia has been protected since April and there is no evidence of a recurring problem; I don't know the policies there, but it should probably be unprotected. —Centrx→talk • 00:24, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I just noticed your message on the translation board regarding de:Kärntner Slowenen. My advice: go ahead and write the translation! Sure, there was some conflict on de.wiki, but that's the nature of Wikipedia: people argue back and forth until, slowly but surely, a high-quality article is produced. If - and this is uncertain - those disputes move here, I'm sure people will be ready to do battle to protect the truth. But that alone is certainly not reason enough to exlcude this subject from the encyclopedia. So I urge you, if you have the time and motivation, to write it, and if protection turns out to be needed, that will be imposed by an administrator. Biruitorul 08:21, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Having translated the article in de.wiki to make an article in en.wiki, I wrote an invisible comment, which I then decided would be better as visible, i.e. on the article's Talk page. However, when I copied and pasted it, it didn't come out in the usual format (the one this page is in). I'm writing to request some help in transferring it into the usual format, or for someone to do this, though it may be better if someone explains what needs doing, so that I would know how to avoid this problem in the future. After the next two to three hours, I shall not be able to deal with any reply until Monday 7 May. CWO 19:03, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I assume I did what you meant? Tell me if I am wrong! I am removing the help me tag for now, don't hesitate to put it back if you need further help! -- lucasbfr ^talk 19:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got there a tad after the nick of time and noticed that the translater note on the Talk page was in <pre> tag format. This seems to happen automatically if there are extraneous spaces before the first character. I deleted the space before the first word ("Translator") and it fixed itself. Was that what you meant? Nerwen 19:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks indeed to both of you.CWO 19:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(1) When I searched for Menachem Pressler, all I got was a list of relevant articles with percentages. However, a search in Google produces the Wikipedia article as one of its results on the first page, and the article can be reached through this. (This is not caused by a typo on my part: having had this problem yesterday, I copied and pasted the name from Wikipedia search to Google this time.) (2) When I tried to create a Wikilink to this article from P.'s name in the section on the Jacobs School of Music in the article Indiana University (Bloomington), the preview of changes showed the link as red, not blue, so I left it. Would somebody please be kind enough to sort this out or give a non-techie who hasn't a clue about templates, tag formats, etc. some simple instructions on how to rectify it?CWO 18:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I kept wondering why so long had elapsed without a reply but, on checking, I found that I had not typed in the "helpme" request correctly, so this appeared without the template. However, I have again checked the position just now (repeating the steps above) and the problems still exist. CWO 18:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Spelling error? Menachem Pressler or Menahem Pressler? :-) Stwalkerster talk 18:47, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! not a spelling error you said, but typing Menachem Pressler (with the c) produces a result to Menahem Pressler (without a c) :-) Stwalkerster talk 18:50, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. I am appalled to discover that I've been thinking of his name with the wrong spelling for years!CWO 19:04, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}

Despite spending about fifteen minutes trying to get the numbering of the Notes correct, I regret I still can't. As explained on the Discussion page and in the Notes, I have added/rectified and amplified the information. The reference shown as [2] in the Notes is in fact the same as [1] in External Links - (the radio interview with Don Swaim), but I can't get this right. If there's somebody out there willing to try to rectify this, or give me (a non-techie) comprehensible instructions on how to rectify it, I'd be very grateful.CWO (talk) 21:22, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hope I've fixed it to your satisfaction. The way to create references in Wikipedia articles is explained at great length at WP:REF, but is essentially as follows: in the body of the article, at the point the referenced material is used, insert <ref></ref> tags with details (including links) of the reference between the tags. At the bottom of the page (preferably in a section entitled 'References') add the code <references/>. This will cause everything written bettween <ref></ref> tags anywhere in the article to appear in the references section in numbered order, with clickable footnote links. Post another helpme or ask on my talk page if this explanation's incomprehensible. Algebraist 23:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}

I don't know whether my comment on the Discussion page will automatically come to the attention of an administrator, but I would be grateful if someone could ensure that it would. This concerns extensive, uncited, verbatim copying from Ivri Lider's website.{{helpme}}CWO (talk) 14:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took the liberty of listing it in a more effective way. You can use the {{copyvio}} tag, which has instructions for how to list the issue on Wikipedia:Copyright problems#New listings. Hoof Hearted (talk) 16:08, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:-) I'm not sure how the algorithm works, but I was actually born on February 20, safely within the Pisces margin. It must assume a birth time of midnight UTC and perhaps it messes up counting leap years. Oh well, it's good to know that it's accurate to within ±2 days! Hoof Hearted (talk) 17:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CWO,
Thank you for these books. I had only heard about the second one and never read it but it seems particularly interesting and focus on the human side of the relation between Arabs and Jews, which is often forgotten when these topics are discussed.
See you, Ceedjee (talk) 13:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits, but please don't use other wikis as sources. As anyone can add anything, they are not reliable as sources. DrKiernan (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CWO. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CWO. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CWO. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CWO!

would you consider to help translationg the following page from German into English? https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Payment_Technologies

thx and best regards Michael

MiSpan (talk) 15:16, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CWO - thx for your response on my Talk-Page. I'm looking forward to the result of your work. Best regards Michael MiSpan (talk) 12:38, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CWO,

Would you be bale to translate the below article for the German wikipedia? I have been making requests to translators on the List of German translators. Have not yet had any replies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_graffiti_and_street_art_injuries_and_deaths — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xyxyzyz (talk • contribs) 22:30, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CWO. I understand you are a fluent speaker of German, and a former translator. I will be grateful if you will offer an English translation of the byline of this Deutsche Welle article, and as much as the remainder of the article as you have the inclination for (paragraphs 3, 4, 5 are the most relevant for WP purposes). It's for use in the article Julian Assange.

Google translate gives "A key witness for the indictment against the imprisoned Wikileaks founder revokes his testimony and MPs from almost all parties appeal to US President Joe Biden - but also to Chancellor Angela Merkel."

Thanks for your help. Cambial foliage❧ 12:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Julian Amery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Faber.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have now corrected the link. CWO (talk) 11:37, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to add the following text to the article:

In 2016 Lynn’s play The Patriotic Traitor about the relationship of Philippe Pétain to Charles de Gaulle was published. In the words of the blurb, ‘Two giants of the twentieth century who loved each other like father and son until they found themselves on opposing sides in World War II. In 1945 de Gaulle had his oldest friend tried for treason. Their complex relationship – noble, comic and absurd – changed history.’Cite error: The <ref> tag has too many names (see the help page).

After four attempts and reading the help page, I still get the error message: "<ref> tag has too many names (see the help page)". I'd be grateful for help in rectifying the problem, please. CWO (talk) 09:05, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am further confused because after three attempts, this page does not show the details of the reference or the second reference that follows. I am puzzled how anyone can help if some of the relevant text is missing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CWO (talk • contribs) 09:11, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When you name a reference, if the name you give it is two words long, it must be in quotes. For example, <ref name=deGaule>... is fine, but <ref name=de Gaule>... is not, so you would need to use <ref name="de Gaule">... instead. See WP:REFB for more info on reusing and naming references. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 12:07, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help. I have now succeeded in entering all the information I wanted to. CWO (talk) 15:13, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A relatively minor point, but I’d be grateful to know how to rectify it, please. This comes from the “Release” section of the article on the film Aftersun.

“Aftersun was distributed in Austria, France, Germany, India, Ireland, Italy, Latin America, Spain, Turkey and the United Kingdom by Mubi and in the United States and Canada by A24.[10][11] It was released in the United States on 21 October 2022 and in the United Kingdom on 18 November 2022.[12][13]

“The film was released for video on demand on December 20, 2022.[14]”

I am trying to make the format of the dates consistent, but when I type in “20 December 2022”, I get an error message about maintenance templates which I can't type here because the system refuses to save the error.” CWO (talk) 13:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what error you were getting, as it seemed to work fine for me. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 13:51, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for looking at the problem in the Aftersun article and correcting it.CWO (talk) 14:26, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harry Ransom Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Moore.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea how this occurred. I did not knowingly do anything other than put lists in alphabetical order. CWO (talk) 16:01, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stéphan Elmas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Études.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The grave accent is there even on the book cover in English, but this was missing in the article until I rectified it, as shown in my Contributions in early October. I have tried to insert this in the title, but have not succeeded. It evidently requires more knowledge than I have. As explained in a previous edit summary, I wasn't able to change the name given above the jpg. image either, though I suspect that can be done only by the owner of the image. CWO (talk) 12:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the page. WP:MOVE describes this process (for future reference). If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 12:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your work on this, particularly so soon after my request, and also for the reference to WP:MOVE. CWO (talk) 12:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alex Price, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beautiful Thing.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]