Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

User talk:CELSANL

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Star Mississippi 21:49, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, CELSANL! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Star Mississippi 21:49, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael E. Papka (computer scientist) (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ldm1954 were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please read carefully WP:NPROF. While you have described him, you have not demonstrated notability. With a relatively weak publication record and no major awards there is no strong indication of peer recognition outside ANL. You have to prove this (if you can), guilty until prove pn innocent applies. You also have to include independent sources for all claims, even his degrees.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ldm1954 (talk) 14:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CELSANL