Archive

I've left some more comments, and I've done quite a bit of copy-editing. Please don't be afraid to undo anything I've done which you don't like, or where I've changed any meanings. And feel free to tell me to go away and stop interfering at any point! Sarastro1 (talk) 19:34, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can only hope it succeeds your expectations now, at this point. Bruce Campbell (talk) 21:22, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The review for "Blame Game" is up. Get to it!--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:07, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did as much as I could with copy-editing. Understand some extraneous stuff and diction changes, but if the editor still feels more should be done, perhaps he should specify what. Dan56 (talk) 02:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Congrats on your first featured article: Terms of Endearment (The X-Files). Keep up the great work! TBrandley 02:52, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats. Now get down into that basement and carve yourself a witch. GRAPPLE X 02:53, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LMAO, wtf? It didn't even get spotchecked. How awesome though! I really have to thank the 5000 people who copy-edited though, they were really the heroes. I really just pimped out the article's foundation. Bruce Campbell (talk) 03:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A spotcheck isn't a necessity, though it is rare for a new FA nominator not to be asked for one. I can only assume that since myself and Gen. Quon had vouched for the sources, and we've had several noms in the past using the same source materials, that that was taken as an approval of the article reflecting the sources—with six prior The X-Files FAs they're probably pretty confident we're not making it all up. While I'm here, hate to bother you but could you let me know about my response to your source suggestions on the "Ice" ACR? I'd like to move to FAC soon but I don't want to miss anything at the ACR first. Thanks! GRAPPLE X 15:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't comment further cause I had nothing else to add after the support. I just figured I would bring them to attention, even if they were redundant. lol It was approved either way. I guess I'm gonna start working on "Home" for my second attempt. Bruce Campbell (talk) 16:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's not my point. I had agreed to User: Tomica that we would improve the Rihanna albums. It's not very good faith considering you think it is GA worthy by making one edit when myself and Tomica have contributed to the article far more than what you have. It can be a three way nomination. Plus, there are still a lot of things which need to be improved. AARON• ^TALK 11:52, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Calvin especially with the last query. The article it's still not ready and can be quickly failed. The references are total mess. Here and there the prose needs to be fixed. Do you agree we quickly work on the article today and tomorrow and make it a 3 way nomination? Cheers! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 12:01, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever just do what you want with it, nm. Bruce Campbell (talk) 15:39, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's awesome. I've been meaning to get back to work, but I still am recovering from all the work I did. I'm glad to see season 3 is finally nearly done!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:19, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, it seems that way. I did a few (Kaddish, Leonard Betts, probably some more) awhile back, but I focused my energy on 6 and 7 (my favorite seasons), then decided to get 8 and 9 while I was there. I started 2 and 5 and was going to work my way in the middle before I just ran out of steam. Season 4 is a really good season, though, so I feel bad it wasn't getting any love.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:41, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, have you seen the whole series? If so, would you mind voting at Wikipedia:WikiProject The X-Files A-Class review. I'd love to get some of those promoted and moved out of there; they've been sitting for awhile.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:50, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added The X-Files (season 3) up at the good topic nomination board!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 06:52, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I've been delaying.. I'll try to do that this weekend. Go ahead and do "Home", that will be a good addition!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 16:44, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I finished off "Synchrony" with what Gen. Quon provided me, but you can add more on that if you can. I also expanded Sanguinarium with info from Meisler's book, and will later see if I can add anything to the remaining gaps. Let's close off the series! igordebraga ≠ 02:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you and Quon have access to more sources than I, than you could finish the remaining two articles better than I ever could. I'll review them when they get done, either way. The main article is in pretty good condition too, ya'll are so damn close! Bruce Campbell (talk) 03:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've got Meisler's book, and after much waiting he gave me scans of the Cinefantastique review, Wanting to Believe and The Complete X-Files pertaining to Synchrony. Can you offer anything else? (and you can kick-off the improvement as well, if pushing older articles to FA level isn't your priority at the moment) igordebraga ≠ 04:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll expand Synchrony in a bit once I'm done with Home. I don't really have any particular priority, I'm just trying to be helpful. I really only work on one FA article at a time (atleast so far). Bruce Campbell (talk) 18:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'm going to submit "all things". It's been in the queue longest. Either that or "Deadalive". That one is in pretty good shape too. The problem I've started to run into is that I have a backlog of A-Class contenders, and the process takes so long...--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:32, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As long as they're in good shape going in you could see about co-nomming things. Whoever brought "Home" to GA could be a co-nominator for it, allowing either of the nominators to add a second nomination. GRAPPLE X 18:26, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For "Home", Gen. Quon was the GA nominator, and Trust Is All You Need was the main contributor. I was gonna nominate in a bit. I don't really have anything else cooking other than "Oubliette", which is far away, so it doesn't quite matter to me either way. It's Quon who has like a dozen articles stockpiled. Bruce Campbell (talk) 18:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a link to the article: https://www.yousendit.com/download/WUJaOU1hV3JtMElLSk5Vag --Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:52, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kindly; implementing as we speak. Bruce Campbell (talk) 20:08, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've been a little busy this week, but I should be able to take a look before the weekend. If it is OK with you, I'll copy-edit directly, and post any questions to the article talk page. If I haven't done anything by the start of next week, please ping me again. Sarastro1 (talk) 16:54, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bruce Campbell. I'm notifying you that I will be reviewing this article. You have waited long enough. Please expect comments very soon at the review page. —WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 02:10, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. Honestly, I forgot it was even nominated. I think I worked on it... a quarter of a year ago? I cant even remember. Hope its still in good condition. Bruce Campbell (talk) 02:16, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bruce, as I lightly copyedited this article before promotion to FA, I still had it on my watchlist when you made your recent edit. I think the wrong lesson was learnt from the "Home" FAC. If you say "Terms of Endearment" is the seventh episode of the sixth season of the American science fiction television series The X-Files, which originally aired on the Fox network on January 3, 1999", the comma and "which" effectively say that the The X-Files originally aired on 3 Jan 99. I think what you meant is that this particular episode aired then, and using "and" gets that across a little better I think. It's something to consider on all TV episode articles, to avoid confusion between the show as a whole and one particular episode. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:38, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just went and reverted my own edit, in general anything learned from the "Home" FAC was questionable. Thank you. Bruce Campbell (talk) 23:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you withdrew the Home FAC. I hope this has not been too discouraging. As I've just said somewhere else, FAC can be a frustrating experience for a variety of reasons. Prose is a very tricky thing to get right. I think the problem, as in your previous FAC, is partly owing to editors, with the best of intentions, jumping in to support without really looking too closely at prose. Of the comments you got, Sandy is always worth listening to and she cares deeply about the integrity of FAC. Such comments as this are common at FAC, where reviewers prefer to give examples rather than list any problems they see. Admittedly, this makes it hard to see what the problems are, but tends to save time at FAC. To be honest, I was less convinced by the other oppose; over-linking is not such a huge issue, and I'm not sure I agree with all of the prose issues listed, but the typos listed do illustrate why more eyes are a good thing.

A copy-edit does not always resolve every issue (as you may have gathered with this article!), and an effective copy-edit requires a long time spent re-visiting the article. I find it is better to find 3 or 4 people to look before going anywhere near FAC, and approach them directly. The more eyes, the better the result. I would suggest not just relying on copy-editors, but to find someone really, really good at prose to help and even if they only copy-edit a section, look at what they do and why. Also look at this article and some of the prose exercises on Tony1's user page; these pages are invaluable for improving prose. If you can see what it is that reviewers see, it reduces the need for copy-editors and avoids some of the problems that one or two articles may have had at FAC recently. I hope you keep going for FAs (my first FAC was a train-wreck on prose grounds!). Sarastro1 (talk) 21:48, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to start work on the main page while "Home" cools a bit? I've been working on "Broadcast and release". I don't really care who has what, though.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 01:33, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ryanndon.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:28, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GAN for this article is being reviewed, and there is a contentious aspect of the article that the reviewer is bringing up: the ratings template. Just wanted to let you know; he might fail it on those grounds alone, saying things like "I cant pass this article with this template" but "whatever happens after" is whatever. Dan56 (talk) 21:53, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• The initial review for Late Registration has been completed and is now on hold. The article is fine, and I don't see significant problems other than enthusiastic tone. A copy edit should resolve the quibbles I have. I have put on hold for an initial seven days, but I am prepared to keep the review open until the copy-editing has been done, and I appreciate that we are now in the holiday season. See: Talk:Late Registration/GA1. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 12:55, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am no longer editing on Wikipedia. Either just fail it or Dan56 can take care of it or whoever else wants to. Bruce Campbell (talk) 21:54, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article has now been listed as a Good Article. Thanks for your nomination. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 11:41, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lostintheworldkanye.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:02, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring Crimewave to Good Article status. I hope you return someday... your work is greatly valued! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:55, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Undead Barnstar
		Since I "adopted" four of the articles you removed from the GAN and made them pass. Thanks for doing a great job there, hope some day you rise from your grave and return! igordebraga ≠ 20:35, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just warning ya that your work keeps on getting a good rep. igordebraga ≠ 13:55, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 14:49, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Throne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Throne until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:34, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know you don't edit on Wikipedia anymore, but if you ever do come back, I'd just for you to know that I carried on your torch with "Home" and got it up to FA. Since I credited both of us as co-nominators, you can display this!

Hopefully see ya again!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:51, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a note to let the main editors of Terms of Endearment (The X-Files) know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on February 27, 2014. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask Bencherlite (talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 27, 2014. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

"Terms of Endearment" is the seventh episode of the sixth season of the American science fiction television series The X-Files, originally airing in January 1999. The show centers on FBI special agents Fox Mulder (David Duchovny) and Dana Scully (Gillian Anderson) who work on cases linked to the paranormal called X-Files. In this episode, an unborn child is apparently abducted from its mother's womb by a demon after the prospective parents discover that their child has birth defects, leading Mulder and Scully to investigate. They discover that Wayne Weinsider (played by Bruce Campbell, pictured in 2011) is a child-abducting demon. The episode received mixed reviews. The plot was criticised but Campbell, already well known as a cult film actor in several Sam Raimi horror movies, received positive comments for his performance. Critics have complimented the episode's unique representation of its antagonist, who has been classified as a sympathetic villain. Many of the episode's special effects were created without elaborate computer-generated effects. It earned a Nielsen rating of 10.5 and was watched by 18.7 million people on its initial broadcast. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 780th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:40, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Six years ago, you were recipient no. 780 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:36, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I' m not very experienced with Wikipedia code. I wanted to know what you used to make the infobox on the 12 years a slave accolades page open when you click "show" to the side of the main table without pushing it down the article. Many thanks for your assistance. Cowlibob (talk) 21:41, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Hope you're well. I don't know if you're still active on Wikipedia but just to let you know that I've nominated one of your lists, 12 Years a Slave accolades for FLC. I've added you as co-nominator to recognise the immense effort you made on compiling this list. Cowlibob (talk) 23:15, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My enthusiasm for the Wiki project was diminished after being harassed by the FAC moderators, but I am still here once in a while. That's some amazing work done on that article and I wish you the best on passing the FL promotion. I'll help out if needed. Bruce Campbell (talk) 19:02, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason I hadn't seen this reply till now but thanks for offering to help, as you probably already know the list got promoted last month. I can empathise that the Wiki experience can be greatly affected by other users but I hope you continue to contribute when you can. Cowlibob (talk) 18:52, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy track listing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:43, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frozen: Olaf's Quest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frozen: Olaf's Quest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lordtobi (✉) 14:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Synchronyxfiles.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Userpicturebruce.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:28, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article [[:The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.]] has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:11, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bruce Campbell! Your name popped up the other day, and I saw that you edited the other day. Just wanted to say hi, and that I hope you're doin' well! I'm going over some of my past edits for a project I'm working on, and I came across some of the X-Files 'fights' that we all had with other editors c. 2012; anyway, I'm still miffed that the FACers were asshats to you back in the day.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 00:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man. Wow. Welcome back :) isento (talk) 04:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Warlock of YS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warlock of YS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kanye-west-devil-in-a-new-dress-500x491.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Heartlesskanyeogg.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dreamlivinlie.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dreamshawty.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the Home (The X-Files) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 11, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 11, 2021, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Hey, BC! Idk if you ever check this page any more, but I had a question for you. I sent ya an email about it via Wikipedia, but I thought I'd post here, too.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey bruce i noticed you started a couple of tour pages on Wikipedia years ago, Do you think you could add the Puffy and Friends tour from 1997 on Wikipedia. I would really appreciate it. --Aaron106 (talk) 15:23, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:14, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]