Archives

Archive 1

visit paid Boyfromborderregion (talk) 10:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've reviewed your article Mellower Coffee and suggest to add more [Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources reliable sources] to it. As an example this article mentions the company. Use Google News and other sources to add more credible source. Also the lead section of the article is too long. It should contain just the very basic information about the subject. Try to shorten it. Good luck with your edits. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 14:50, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know that was posted a day earlier, but I just saw it now. Thank you for the WikiLove. It is the first I've ever had, and it has made a fairly rubbish day better. If there is something you'd like me to do for you, just ask anytime. :) Foxnpichu (talk) 17:51, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have reverted your edit on the page. The article is currently a featured list candidate and reviewers have stated their preference for including references in this article to support the releases, without having to navigate across various pages which defeats the purpose of this as a FLC. You also changed the date formatting. This page is fine the way it is. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 03:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ashleyyoursmile, thank you for notice! Wish the page will be a FL! :) -- BrandNew Jim Zhang (talk) 03:27, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BrandNew Jim Zhang, no problem I just wanted to let you know since many editors are unware that it is going through a review currently. All good! . :) Ashleyyoursmile! 03:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed you've made edits to Ricky Martin articles. I thought you may be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Ricky Martin We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ricky Martin and his discography. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page! Thank You.

آرمین هویدایی (talk) 23:37, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@آرمین هویدایی: Thank you for your invitation! But recently I cannot focus on only one artist's biography or discography... :( -- BrandNew Jim Zhang (talk) 13:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Ok thank you and sorry I took your time. While if you can just add your name to the participants list (if you may help later), I will be thankful. Because the project is nominated for deletion, unless a few people joins us... آرمین هویدایی (talk) 17:55, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BrandNew Jim Zhang. I noticed that you often use the certification table by adding both a certified number and a sourced number. Unfortunately, this type of usage is not supported by the template and undermines the entire idea of having a standard footnote and certification number capability. I don't wish to discuss consensus, but I also suspects it is against consensus. If you think this requirement is mandatory, please discuss it at the template talk page. --Muhandes (talk) 13:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Muhandes: Hey, thank you for your kind reminder, but I don't understand "adding both a certified number and a sourced number", can you give me an example? Maybe it's my fault and I even don't know :( -- BrandNew Jim Zhang (talk) 03:25, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a recent example. According to the template documentation, the template uses the |salesamount= to override sales amount with a sales figure from a reliable source, when not based on the certification.. It is not to be used in the form you are using it, to add "8,000,000^‡ / 3,500,000". --Muhandes (talk) 12:14, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I get it. Thank you again for the notification and I first saw the usage on a certain page (I forgot which one :( ), finally I accepted the usage. I do not think that is a current consensus, let me discuss it on the template talk page :) and Like -- BrandNew Jim Zhang (talk) 14:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead!

RuiyuShen 15:46, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder that your signature contains obsolete font tags. They create Linter errors, but unfortunately because the replacement signature <span style="font-family:segoe print;">[[User:BrandNew Jim Zhang|<span style="color:#BAD4AA;">BrandNew</span> <span style="color:#D4D4AA;">Jim</span> <span style="color:#C1A075;">Zhang</span>]] [[User talk:BrandNew Jim Zhang|<span style="color:#7C6354;">(talk)</span>]]</span> is too long (276 characters > 255), you are advised to change it to something else.

The purpose of this message is because Linter errors affect the way the page looks, and with a lot of errors, the page may render badly. To reduce Linter errors, please change your signature. Sheep (talk) 15:04, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reminder and I will change it ASAP -- BrandNew Jim Zhang (talk) 04:57, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]