Can someone please help me?

What do you need help with? —C.Fred (talk) 20:30, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dr. Robert D. Livernois requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 20:35, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:55, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are still making several additions without edit summaries. Please do start. Brianhe (talk) 22:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Sterling Heights High School. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. John from Idegon (talk) 22:47, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bobby232332. You have new messages at John from Idegon's talk page.
Message added 23:24, 12 November 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

John from Idegon (talk) 23:24, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 19:10, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

don't add false information to articles. Earthscent (talk) 17:49, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not false information please put them back on there and let's move on please and thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobby232332 (talk • contribs)

No, thanks. It's clearly fake. Did you read it somewhere or did you make it up? Earthscent (talk) 18:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If it's valid information, then please provide some links to reliable sources that have reported it. —C.Fred (talk) 18:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete sourced information. Earthscent (talk) 21:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Earthscent someone don't have the info for Arnold Schwarzenegger Rick Santorum and Joe Ricketts. go tell them.

Sorry, Bobby, but you're lying. All three are sourced. Earthscent (talk) 21:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC) Ok thank you and I am Sarry to. Let's go find the person who put them on there and ask him were's there info.[reply]

Their sources are listed in the appropriate places. Earthscent (talk) 21:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

you can make changes yourself, as long as they're backed up by reliable sources. you don't have to ask other people to do it for you. but the key thing is to back up your information with reliable sources, rather than just making things up. Earthscent (talk) 23:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 15:53, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bobby232332 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to see Mickey's Singure on the Mickey Mouse page becuse I think It would be good on that page. Bobby232332 (talk) 16:43, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This isn't an unblock request, it does not acknowledge the reason for blocking, and makes no mention of how you will step away from the actions that caused the block. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:56, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bobby232332 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am sorry please unblock me Bbb23? Bobby232332 (talk) 19:56, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:35, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bobby232332 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am sorry please unblock me Bbb23? And I want to know why you blocked me? And Deleated the massage I took time witeing to you on your talk page? Bobby232332 (talk) 20:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As the block message says, you are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. You should address that. Evading this block to continue to edit is not permitted and will be held against you. Huon (talk) 21:01, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bobby232332 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like a responce from the User who blocked me please? Bobby232332 (talk) 21:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is now the fourth unblock request in which you've failed to address any of the reasons for your block. I consider this an abuse of the appeal process and am revoking talk page access. If you decide to make a serious case as to why you should be unblocked, you may still use the Unblock Ticket Request System. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:16, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• You say above "And Deleated the massage I took time witeing to you on your talk page?", but this account has made no edits to User talk:Bbb23. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:10, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boing! said Zebedee, this is what Bobby232332 refers to. Block evasion. Huon (talk) 23:11, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yep ;-) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:36, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Bobby232332 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #18098 was submitted on Apr 21, 2017 21:41:25. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 21:41, 21 April 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Bobby232332 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #18151 was submitted on Apr 28, 2017 01:42:29. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:42, 28 April 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Bobby232332 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #25583 was submitted on Jun 13, 2019 19:31:29. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:31, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]