Welcome!

Hello, Blacklist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - iGod 08:31, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I personally will not stop watching WWE main events just beacause they choose to use a useless wrestler as the WWE Champion! The smark community has a lot of power and we will continue to protest in hope that something is done to change this wrestling horror. (Fr3nZi3 00:52, 15 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

... well, you can go ahead and say that. But you should've learned by now that the WWE doesn't give a crap about the smark community. That's the truth. Plus, you guys expect too much from Cena. Give the dude a break. There are plenty of worst wrestlers out there for you guys to criticize. Blacklist 07:55, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Name one! Cena is the worst wrestler, and if they didnt care about the Smark community why is it that they made him lose the belt when he started to get booed? WWE is nothing without the smark community. As a man I think Cena is extrememly funny, but as a wrestler he is a rubbish rip off of the Rock--he has six moves and thats all! What he seems to forget is that The Rock had other moves other than his finishers! He has been the WWE Champion twice now--and he still hasn't improved in the slightest! I personally think he needs to go to OVW and really get some intense training, and come back with a better moveset, because at the moment he is a pathetic wrestler, and I think even you can agree with that!!! (Fr3nZi3 17:47, 17 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Well, there are the jobbers. And then there's some entry-level dudes like Conway and Big Vis. I do agree with you that Cena needs to make his movelist more colorful, but every wrestler has a gamplan in each of their matches, and their gameplan get used over and over in different (but repetitive) ways. Bret Hart had the same setup in some of his matches. You could sence an ending in some of his matches, because he did some moves over and over up to the sharpshooter. That was where the "Five moves of Doom" saying came from. And, Cena lost the belt because everyone started booing Cena. Not just your everyday smarks. Blacklist 03:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I may be a John Cena fan but I do feel that his character could use a little approvement but I will cheer him on no matter what. He is the new Hulk Hogan!!! And about what wrestlers are worse than Cena look up Rob Van Dam, Kurt Angle, and The Ultiamte Warrior. These guys stink up the place no matter where they wrestle. Big Boss 0 19:22, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

re: "No WBW breakdowns" - Relating to this so called "WBW breakdown" that I put today is part of the wiki relating to the WWE belt as opposed to the RAW episode itself and what was the flowon effect of the loss of the match - it does not mention an episode or week by week matter - if you seem to have a better idea of mentioning a major part of the John Cena character and his MAJOR TRADEMARK, please make the appropriate change to reflect this or get over it! - 25 August 2006 Mikecraig

It ain't my rule. No Week-by-Week breakdowns are allowed to the article. The only news to be posted are title changes or major announcements/developments. Having a kayfabe belt thrown into the Long Island Sound during a promo is not notable. If that goes in (and is accepted by Bdve), then you need to add the fact that Cena threw Edge into the Lond Island Sound, in retaliation. Blacklist 21:02, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The last points of the disccussion about that haven't been denied, so actually mugen infatry is recognized as non-necessary, thus the removal was justified, if you disagree with the point talk about it in the discussion page, I'll re-remove it in a week from now if some good reason for having it in doesn't jump out in that period. --2dMadness 02:55, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Listen here, Kung Fu Man, MFG members and other Wikipedia members have agreed that the site is worth adding. It is a notable site in the community, and is a major english-speaking Mugen site. Read the descriptions from previous edits. It stays. If you have any other questions, talk to Kung Fu Man. Blacklist 04:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did, and he agreed just to end the quarrel, and that ain't gonna work for me, as big as it looks, Mugen-Infatry is neither the biggest nor the most influent of the forums that are not present on that page, so either we add every single forum that is bigger and/or more influent, which would end un in 4-5 links more, or we remove M-I.--2dMadness 20:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If it isn't working for you, it isn't working with anybody. Just leave it, okay? Blacklist 18:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not okay, it's not "works for me" or not, that page is ranked very lowly in the "Mugen list of influential and/or intresting websites", the fact that their owners possess this sort of "OMG we're invincible, you're crybabies, stop this drama you drama queens" attitude can scare Kung_Fu_Man and/or other people to add them, but the point is: they host LESS stuff than my own portal does, they have LESS content, they provide LESS services (if compared to mgbr or mugenfury) and so on, they are SO unimportant, so why they should be in? Seriously, what is the reason for letting them in? --2dMadness 08:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: with "my portal" I'm not talking of randomselect, and I'm not gonna beg for publicity here as well, so it stays unnamed. --2dMadness 08:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For someone NOT begging for publicity, you're sure acting like you're looking for some. Anyway, the site's owner, Aztec Soldier, is a well-known member of the Mugen community, and it's former owner, Syn, is famous/infamous for his character, "Insane Hiryu." MGBR and Mugen Fury are centered towards their own separate countries (Brazil and France). MI might be seen as another U.S. site, but they DO provide a character database better than both MGBR and Fury, and they are NOT warehousers, like Mugen Fury is well-known for.

And if that doesn't work for you, then you're obviously not in the Mugen loop and do not understand how helpful MI can actually be. Blacklist 01:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would help other editors (including the AfD's closing administrator(s)) if you could elaborate upon your comments. AfD is not a vote, and simply saying "Keep, it's X" or "Delete, it's Y" doesn't lend a lot of weight to your argument. --Slowking Man 23:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to your message at my Talk page. --Slowking Man 00:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sprotect and Sprotect2 are just a template, dude. You don't have to have adminship to add the template, nor make the template "work". Adding {{sprotect}} doesn't protect the page, and niether does Sprotect2. Sprotect2 was created for long-term vandalized pages so that the template is littler and out of the way and makes the page look neater. Sprotect and Sprotect2 work the same way, just Sprotect2 was made for long-term semi-protection, not short. Stop reverting based on the fact I'm not an admin. semper fi — Moe 19:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thats fine :) semper fi — Moe 02:35, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Familyguytakeonme.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

... I did? Blacklist (talk) 03:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's just a bot, it can't respond back man. Anyway actually had a reason for visiting your talk page: what do you think about making a mugen article for Babel Sword?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 19:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Electronic Arts. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 06:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dharma logo in Half-Life 2- Episode 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This edit is completely inappropriate and will not be tolerated. DMacks (talk) 16:18, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First, spammers like the M.U.G.E.N. spamming IP can be reported at mediawiki talk:Spam-blacklist, or if there are links being posted to multiple wikis then m:talk:Spam blacklist. You could also join the spam wikiproject. Second, "Blacklist" is a somewhat provocative username, you might want to consider changing it. WP:UNC tells you how. Thanks, Guy (Help!) 22:18, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am writing to you because I think that you have an impact on the text on the wiki

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M.U.G.E.N

---

in wiki/M.U.G.E.N

• M.U.G.E.N. SAMOUCZEK— Polish site. Tutorials and M.U.G.E.N creations database. (Samouczek means Tutorial) (in Polish)/(in English)
• Mugen.pl— Polish Warehous. (in Polish)/(in English)

in wiki/Talk

• M.U.G.E.N. SAMOUCZEK— it is Polish site. Tutorials and M.U.G.E.N creations database. Samouczek means Tutorial.

Mugen.pl — it is only Polish Warehous, only forum. Writing on the forum you can download creations placed there without the permission of authors ! Administrator Mugen.pl sold Mugen on the allegro, it was a normal knife, collection creations without permission of authors, combine in game and sold.

---

I wrote something like this because I know something about it. I am not a novice and I know the Polish scene. People like Wucash, DooM, WooshaQ, Jarek Bachanek and others are my friends, also from the Polish. I will fight for it and I would like to link to samouczek.com appeared instead mugen.pl - ordinary warehous.

with respect ARMOR_CAGE

---

Blacklist, I represent the website guy above is trying to accuse (mugen.pl) and basically all of it is just a bunch of lies. People from concurrent website are jealous kids trying to shut down our portal that has existed on the internet for much longer. This topic has already been raised by them on mugenguild website, where long discussion that included many of mugen creators ended up this dispute with verdict propitious to us. It is not the role of wiki to decide whenever any link placed here has content 'hosted without permission' where in this case it is not a case anyway (we still have article about YouTube don't we?). Many of the mugen creators are linking back to our website, we are supporting numerous mugen projects and this just unjustified to attack us like that. I am ready to argue all day long, and in my opinion leaving the link to the biggest Polish mugen website - mugen.pl does make sense. Otherwise, simply delete all links to Polish websites from English article if we can't find any agreement.

Regards, Santo

Topic on the mugenguild has no solution. Your speech is a mixture of slander and nonsense, each page lists the links and contacts with other websites. Mention of children is a comedy. mugen.pl is normal warechous, this is all. It is important, website called mugen.pl it always gave the mugen and polish scene a bad name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dobreoko (talk • contribs) 19:52, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.149.234 (talk) 01:20, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dear wiki moderation team, i always used wikipedia as a source of the knowledge and was quite happy with the results that i got but it was before i decided to contribute myself and discover the unfair rules and ignorance that obviously some moderators abuse. i was a fan of mugen engine for years, and know how scene developed, especially the polish one in which i took active part. what saddens me is how the moderators ignores the obvious truths promoting the websites that host stolen creations. in case you are aware of the fact mugen comunity has this one major law, we don't host characters made by other people without their permission (many good coders left the scene because of people ignoring this law). i pointed this fact not once that in the entry regarding mugen in the external section there is a link to one of the sites that violates the scene law. for the sake of mugen comunity could you please remove website called mugen.pl from the entry since it always gave the mugen and polish scene a bad name, thank you!

So I add link, unfortunately probably soon someone will remove it and add this mugen.pl warehouse again.

With respects. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dobreoko (talk • contribs) 23:11, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mugen505.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]