Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Katherine Heiny and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:25, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Blackballnz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:25, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Katherine Heiny, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ L 🌸 (talk) 01:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blackballnz! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 01:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Philippe of Belgium into Queen Mathilde of Belgium. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 10:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this feedback. I'm still fairly new here & getting my head around all the policies. I'll go back and provide the attribution. Blackballnz (talk) 23:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mavis Wheeler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RangersRus (talk) 15:33, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

I'm keen to put some images on the page, which I know is complicated. Is there anywhere I can go to get help with this? Blackballnz (talk) 01:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand (WANZ), kia ora, hello, kia orana, nǐ hǎo, talofa lava, bula vinaka, guten Tag, hola, malo e leilei, fakalofa atu, namaste, salâm, see tahay. Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful.

General

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

Specific to Aotearoa New Zealand

• Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand runs local in person meetups in some cities and has a regular series of events where you can find people to help you on your editing journey or just hang out with like-minded people. Check out local Meet Ups and online editathons. We organise an annual conference and the next one will be in Christchurch in March 2025.
• Join our Facebook group and follow us on Twitter
• Think about becoming a member of Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Einebillion (talk) 20:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blackballnz! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Where to report problematic pages, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:18, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, your recent addition of maintenance tags at Wendt & Kühn was appropriate, but unfortunately their placement broke the infobox. No big deal, it's fixed now. Please get in the habit of using Preview, as it can save you from little typos which have a huge effect. I'll attach some links below. If I can help with anything, please let me know. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 16:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 16:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this advice - I'm still fairly new & have not been in the habit of doing this. I can see how it will help in future. Blackballnz (talk) 06:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blackballnz! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Notable person?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Winifred Reuning, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:37, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blackballnz! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Raghunandan Dhubi, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed it, but your recent edit of Big Island Lake Cree Nation destroyed the infobox. Adding a copy edit tag is counterproductive if it damages page readability. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 18:44, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I should have been more careful in checking. Blackballnz (talk) 01:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blackballnz, during your recent copy-edit of Bukit Brown Cemetery, you removed a citation to the Guradian here without explanation. I realise you're trying to help but if you remove a citation, you should at least explain why in the edit summary. In fact, when copy-editing, it's usually best to leave the citation in place and tag it with an inline template or a note on the talk page explaining why it's unsuitable for the article. Please be more careful in future; I've reverted your edits to that article here. Best regards, Baffle☿gab 00:34, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Baffle gab1978

Hello - it looks like that was removed in error, and I can certainly be more careful.

Can you tell me why you seem to have reversed all of my edits. I thought I was being helpful. This article was very repetitive, and I was trying to fix that (for example, the first paragraph reads: "...the land where the cemetery sits was originally owned by George Henry Brown, a British merchant. He owned the land and due to its hilly terrain, became known as Brown's Hill..."

My version read: "...the land where the cemetery sits was originally owned by George Henry Brown, a British merchant. Due to its hilly terrain, the land became known as Brown's Hill..." Blackballnz (talk) 04:32, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blackballnz

I can see that you have edited the St Mary's Blacburn Wikipedia page back to the content that you previously took the initiative to recently update; in fact removing almost exclusively all the references to the Marists on this page, except the single mention of abuse perpetrated by Kevin O'Neil ... I would be grateful if you could explain your rational for doing this, all of the removed references are factual and relevant to the St Mary's in Blackburn and its association to the Marists

Do you have any association to the school or the Marists, that would explain why you have decided to edit this page. I can see that you have included NZ in your user names; does this represent New Zealand by any chance? The Marists have a significant footprint in New Zealand but perhaps I may be reading too much into this interpretation. The timing of your edits would also are more indicative of a time zone on the other side of the globe from the UK, perhaps I'm again mistaken.

... If you could please provide comment here Harwood214 (talk) 10:08, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Harwood214 - I have no connections to the Marists, nor to the Catholic church, nor to this school - so no conflicts of interests at all - how about you? Also, where I live is irrelevant. I'm here for one reason only, to improve this encyclopedia. I found this page and saw that it was poorly written in parts, hence my changes which included updating the lead, finding new information and new references, and condensing information. The page as it now stands has two references to the Marist brothers, and includes the information about Rev. O'Neill. I certainly think this article can be further improved - mainly by adding information for the period 1925-1978. I see you've included a reference on the talk page - if you feel information should be added, you should go ahead and add it (in your own words, with the reference), but you shouldn't reinstate what was deleted as it didn't reflect Wikipedia policies for the reasons I outlined. I see that you've only made two contributions to Wikipedia, so I'm wondering if you're unfamiliar with the rules & guidelines? For example, if you revert a change you should explain why you did it, not just say "previous edits are not valid" and label it as a minor change.

Have a great day. Blackballnz (talk) 22:40, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again @Harwood214 I'm not sure if you left the msg on the school talk page, as it was an IP address. It may have been another user. Anyway, someone has left the reference. Blackballnz (talk) 22:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blackballnz

Thank you for your response, describing you have no conflict of interest regarding St Mary's, Blackburn; you correctly revealed the reasons for my questions.

I attended the school during part of the period that Kevin O'Neil was headmaster, and have continuing contact with the alumni; much occurred in the walls of the school buildings that affected many of its pupils, the accounts of Graham Caveney highlighting the sexual abuse that occurred to him, there were others as Damian Murray has described.

Please read the reference you chose to remove to understand the circumstances that occurred at the college and the associated behavior of the Marists (Society of Mary). To provide an example of this, in 2015 at the centenary celebration of the college, the Marists chose to put Kevin O'Neil front and centre to celebrate him at this celebration, fully in the knowledge of his deplorable behaviors. If you also need further context for the UK please also read the Wikipedia pages of a collection Catholic schools in the North West of the UK and the prevalence of abuse within these, it is unfortunately commonplace, as is the denial or downplaying of its existence; it is an issue that occurred in the past but also unfortunately persists today; see Ampleforth College as one example. You may also wish to 'research' the behaviors of the Society of Mary in the recent Abuse inquiries in New Zealand to understand how this society has behaved further afield from Blackburn.

The finances that surround the final chapter of the college with the Marists are also relevant to its Wikipedia page as the school carried substantial debts at closure, and the Marists have yet 'taken' significant sums from the sale of the buildings.

I admit that the entries on the Wikipedia page are not ideally written and I commit to re-write this to ensure it is factual and referenced and to condense some of this information; I will however uphold that the abusive behaviors of the Marists at the school are an important part of this content and consequently are to be maintained; as I have described above for a collection Catholic schools in the North West of the UK abuse was commonplace, frequently denied or downplayed, the inclusion of these details on the Wikipedia pages for these schools being an important acknowledgement to the victims of this abuse.

I intend to update the St Mary's Blackburn Wikipedia page early in the New Year as I have indicated above and want to avoid any need for further revisions when doing this

... If you could please respond with any further comments you may have

best 2A00:23C7:FF8C:C001:EC96:D0B2:5816:889A (talk) 09:22, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @2A00:23C7:FF8C:C001:EC96:D0B2:5816:889A

Thanks for this, and I'm sorry for your experiences at college where all the students should have been able to feel and be safe. Yes, I'm very aware of sexual abuse of children by Catholic priests (and others) and also the prevalence of abuse globally. The issue here is not that anything is being covered up, it's that what goes into Wikipedia must adhere to its rules & guidelines. I'd be happy to work with you on this. I've been active on this site since about mid-year, so I've got my head around many of the rules and policies. Blackballnz (talk) 00:50, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]