Hi there,

I created Dawid Bezuidenhout and noticed that your surnames are the same. What is the meaning of it? Is it usually associated with Coloured people?--Thomas.macmillan (talk) 21:59, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info! I recently spent 4 months in South Africa and Namibia and lots of experience with Afrikaans, but never came across the surname.--Thomas.macmillan (talk) 13:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, wees net sekker om 'references' te maak op die "South Africa Under Apartheid" article talk page - dit help. Invmog (talk) 12:45, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking a stance concerning the common Anti-Apartheids garbage. --41.151.106.109 (talk) 21:35, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was trying to edit some articles on the Afrikaans Wikipedia, but I could not register my username because anything containing the word JEW is banned. Do you have any idea why? Thanks a lot. --JewBask (talk) 23:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again; thanks for your prompt response. I thought about the same. Please let me know if you find something out, I am really interested in giving my two cents to the Afrikaans Wikipedia and hence help spread knowledge in the language. Thanks for your help! --JewBask (talk) 22:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I'm in :-) --JewBask (talk) 00:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Bly jy nou in Suid-Afrika? Ek het nou in Suid-Afrika gewees, en ek het jou name baie kere gesien :) --Eivind (t) 08:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, ek het die selfde gebruiker op af.wiki: af:Gebruiker:EivindJ. Well, South Africa is warm, at least :) I'm not very up to date on the political status and stuff, but I reckon and hope everything will solve out down there. I met many Bezuidenhout's in Pretoria ... do you have any family down there? --Eivind (t) 15:36, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would you care to comment on this topic at Wikimedia commons? 67.150.247.57 (talk) 10:19, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the pre-vandalism data. I didn't revert it because I didn't want to lose intermediate edits. If it's something like that, you always have the option to manually correct it. In this case, I looked at the edit history and compared the last edit of the vandal to the prior, non-vandalized version to make sure I identified all data that had been vandalized. Then I literally copied the original data and pasted it over the vandalized data in the current version of the article. ClueBot has a pretty strict criteria to avoid false positives so there are a lot of situations where it will not revert vandalism. It's not always a case of "missing" it. For example, ClueBot won't revert edits by a specific user to a specific article more than once in a given day (I assume to avoid an automated revert war). Keep in mind, those are ClueBot's rules. You are not bound by the same rules (though revert wars are still not allowed, see Wikipedia:3RR). But in the case of vandalism, there is nothing special about fixing repeated vandalism. You may fix it the second time the same way you fixed it the first time. If vandalism persists from a specific user or IP address, warn the user on their user talk page, following the format for warnings outlined in Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace. If they persist after several warnings, and it is obvious that they are vandalizing and that their edits are not in good faith, ask for administrator assistance in Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. They will be able to temporarily or permanently block a user or IP address from editing after repeated vandalism. DanielDeibler (talk) 01:27, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an email? ChrisDHDR 17:26, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, [email removed - be careful of spammers!] :) Bezuidenhout (talk) 18:17, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Interface available. -- sk (talk) 07:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant by "mostly of European descent" is that they could come via America, Australia or other parts of the world (of indirect European descent, sort to say). I didn't mean they were only partly right. But it's good to avoid dubiousness. --Roofbird (talk) 18:22, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, I see what you mean :) Sorry for about that. It is true what you're saying, I guess I was being ignorant.--Bezuidenhout (talk) 18:32, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I should have written "only party WHite" (ipv right) of course :) doe nie worrie nie, no offense taken :) adios, --Roofbird (talk) 18:54, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you konw about {{nobots}}? However it's probably a bad thing to stop all bots; so I think the only way to stop them is to remove all the wikilinks on other wps. They check other wikipedias and then if there are differences add the "missing" ones. ChrisDHDR 17:39, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Chris!--Bezuidenhout (talk) 18:00, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction. Although I think the UK maintains occupied some parts of my country, I have no interest in discussing that, or in carrying out a campaign of vindication. (Google Translate) Greetings.Cêsar (talk) 18:41, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome.

Heya. Your recent edit here appears to have been borne out of frustration with another editor. However, please respect WP:POINT, don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. You made that edit on 14 October, and it was still in that (unreadable) state 9 days later. Thank you! --HiltonLange (talk) 00:33, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure why you consider changing the grammar of an article introduction to be "taking liberties". [1]. See Wikipedia:OWN. Park3r (talk) 16:04, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It feels like you are gradually aiming to ignore the use of the original name in the article completely. The earlier on the name is, I personally think, the more people assume it's used. First you started out moving the article to it's new name (Pietersburg >> Polokwane etc.) then you moved the or in the middle (Polokwane or Pietersburg >> Polokwane, or by it's former name Pietersburg) and now you plan on moving the entire name right to the end. I admit I am being slightly aggressive and exaggerating, and I ask your pardon for this. Bezuidenhout (talk) 17:50, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The wording of the intro seemed unwieldy. I have no agenda regarding name changes, and a review of Talk:City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality will show this quite clearly. Park3r (talk) 20:23, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the Tshwane + municipality name change by the way. :) Bezuidenhout (talk) 20:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cresslawn Primary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable primary school

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 21:23, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Decolonization#Requested_move_2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by MrTranscript (talk • contribs) 23:32, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you challenged the fact that nearly all commercially viable land was transferred to White ownership in Namibia during apartheid. Do you really question this or are you just being difficult?--TM 10:43, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am questioning it, because I doubt that all agricultural land was simply 'taken' away from them. If they were then how the hell did black people survive without the food? Bezuidenhout (talk) 12:55, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For example http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=44666 states that only 52% of land was in white hands in 1990. Bezuidenhout (talk) 12:59, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The operative words are "nearly all" and "commercially viable". Looking at land reform in Namibia, an academic essay by Chris Tapscott, says "74% of the potentially arable land was owned by less than 4,100 people, mainly white, commercial farmers who comprised less than 0.2% of the total population." I'd say that 74% qualifies as nearly.--TM 13:34, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But these figures could represent new farmland created to the help of irrigation and dams. Let's face it, before europeans came along there was little technology, it's not as if the white people 'took over' their dams and farmland. Bezuidenhout (talk) 13:42, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I disagree that 74% is 'nearly all'. Are you saying nearly all of the USA is white? After all 74 or somewhat is white? Bezuidenhout (talk) 13:44, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will leave aside your comments on "new farmland". We can say it more directly: "0.2% of the populations, almost all of whom were White, controlled 74% of the commercially viable land for agriculture."--TM 13:49, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Get your facts straigt, TM. This land became commercially viable AFTER this section of the population put it to economic use. SWA/Namibia is a low rainfall country with more rain in the NORTH EAST of the country, which is mainly owned by Blacks. --41.151.106.109 (talk) 21:38, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For drawing the maps I use spreadsheets downloaded from the IEC's Downloadable Party Results; there are also a whole lot of other election result reports linked from the IEC website. - htonl (talk) 11:32, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An administrator closed the discussion on Cote d'Ivoire - another admin archived it. Adding comments post-archiving is not permitted, and I have merely reverted your commentary via WP:AGF (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:33, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar

I'm always surprised at the varied places that I see your name crop up as a contributer. And it's always contributing details, map locations, info-boxes etc. Your efforts go a long way to making wikipedia more detailed and valuable. I may not always see eye-to-eye with you on socio-political issues, but I can't deny your tireless contributions to Wikipedia - keep it up! HiltonLange (talk) 21:57, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ben Bezuidenhout. You have new messages at Htonl's talk page.
Message added 22:22, 31 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Did you ever have any luck with the 2009 election stats you asked about? If you like I can calculate a summary of the results by municipality and send you a spreadsheet of that. - htonl (talk) 22:24, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I liked the userboxes you use so much that I put a number of them on my own userpage.

I also wanted to let you know that there's a slight slip in the top of your userpage where you said, "my edits not include" instead of "my edits now include"

Have a nice day! (^:

Invmog (talk) 21:57, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ag, I'm glad they could be of use, and nice to find someone with similar ideas on this site. :) Bezuidenhout (talk) 07:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ben Bezuidenhout. You have new messages at Htonl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- htonl (talk) 22:06, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've drawn the map - you can see it on my talk page. - htonl (talk) 13:00, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ben Bezuidenhout. You have new messages at Htonl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- htonl (talk) 18:48, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting contribution at Talk:Afrikaans. I'm not sure how this fits into your idea about a higher # of Afrikaans speakers but I just wanted to share a personal tidbit with you. I left Belgium in 1951, at 4 yrs old, when my parents emigrated to the USA. We continued to speak our dialect of Flemish (SW of Antwerp) and I am relatively fluent in it till this day. We did NOT alter our speaking to each other, or to our relatives in Belgium, because of the Belgian Language shifts of the '60s toward a more Dutch influence (ABN). Our "language" basically stayed in the time envelope of the mid-20th century. The result (as I just recently discovered) is that I can read Afrikaans with very little dificulty whereas Dutch is quite a problem. I would much enjoy a further discussion about this. E-mail?. Buster Seven Talk 17:55, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TY for your reply, Bezuidenhout. I appreciate your safety concerns about email info and share it. There is a way for you to email me if you choose to. In the left margin at my user or talk page User talk:Buster7 is a section called "Toolbox" and a drop down..."e-mail this user". I understand if you choose not to. Buster Seven Talk 21:50, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Butterworth, Eastern Cape, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Xhosa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Kuruman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tswana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Renaming in South Africa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of active separatist movements in Africa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Transvaal and Natalia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ben Bezuidenhout. You have new messages at Underlying lk's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The first template (SA town) seems to be working (with a few caveats for now: af:Gebruiker:Underlying lk/sandbox). You can find it on my user page at af:Gebruiker:Underlying lk. The translations need to be checked (they most likely won't be accurate as I just used Google translate) and the map caption (TOWN-NAME shown within PROVINCE) should be translated.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:05, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion on moving the article Côte d'Ivoire to Ivory Coast. You are being notified since you participated in a previous discussion on this topic. Please join the discussion here if you are interested. TDL (talk) 02:24, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I had promised yesterday, I closed the section; the user is getting trollish without backing the claim and should not be fed. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 17:09, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to have you on board! Cheers, Rai•me 05:24, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ben Bezuidenhout. You have new messages at Htonl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Ben Bezuidenhout. You have new messages at Htonl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thanks for the help in correcting my grammar. Furthermore, I apologies for the long discourse in relation to a mere, silly rebuttal in relation to Afrikaans. I founded that discourse refreshing and constructive. Kind Regards, Roland. Hendrik Biebouw (talk) 11:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

can you explain to me why you think it is better with "Southern african ethnic group" instead of "ethnic group in southern africa" 120.50.35.122 (talk) 16:27, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

see Talk:Afrikaner#not_simply_.22Africans.22 120.50.35.122 (talk) 21:01, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should look stuff up or at least start a talk instead of randomly reverting changes, how about that? The census data for "Cape Town" is confusing because it has "Cape Town proper" which is the historical division and "Cape Town", which is the current boundary of the city. I fixed it to reflect the whole city instead of some part of the city, which is really only historical at this point.

Cheers, fijal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fijal (talk • contribs) 14:35, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, this is confusing, but... The entire article talks more about City of Cape Town Municipality than Cape Town as described in census, it is very confusing (can you find some reference as what exactly is the administrative division? I don't think "Cape Town" as described in the article even exists). Especially stuff like "list of suburbs" contains tons of suburbs that are NOT part of what the article describes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fijal (talk • contribs) 14:44, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Azeem Ward is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azeem Ward until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Winner 42 Talk to me! 00:42, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Azeem Ward requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zackmann08 (talk) 16:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Howzit Ben,

You remember that discussion we had in May of 2014 about how Afrikaans people ought to be described first and foremost as a "Southern African ethnic group" as opposed to a Germanic/European "ethnic group in Africa"? Well it's come up... again. I would very much appreciate your comments on Talk:Afrikaners as and when you can spare the time.

Thanks, hope you're well ~

--Katangais (talk) 17:09, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ben Bezuidenhout. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your claim to be a native speaker of English is not entirely true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.167.164.222 (talk) 12:44, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you update the information about it? Thank you Triplecaña (talk) 07:46, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Afrikaans exonyms, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of names of European cities in different languages until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Afrikaans exonyms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afrikaans exonyms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PepperBeast (talk) 22:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Afrikaans exonyms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afrikaans exonyms (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

toweli (talk) 11:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]