Hello, Berberry! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gimme danger (talk) 19:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Thank you for your contribution to the article Duchess of Richmond's ball. The rest of the article is fully sourced, so please could you add some inline citations to the paragraph you added, so that a reader unfamiliar with the topic can verify that the information is supported by reliable sources. -- PBS (talk) 23:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding on the talk page of the article. If you want to reply to a message placed on your talk page, all you need to do is click on talk link in the signature the end of a message on your talk page. However if the discussion is about the information on a page and not the behaviour of an editor (good or bad), then replying on the article's talk page is as good as anywhere.

If you click on the "new section" tab at the top of a talk page, it always generates a new section at the bottom of the page. So if you create a new section manually please place it at the bottom, as the talk pages the grow from the top down. That is the custom and is supported both by the usage of the new section tab, and in the guidelines (see WP:TOPPOST). -- PBS (talk) 21:24, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will make a comment on the talk page about the citations. -- PBS (talk) 21:24, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Balfour house. -- PBS (talk) 10:30, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See the talk page again. As they say in SE London "Sor'ed innt?"[1] -- PBS (talk) 23:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Balfour House.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 21:00, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Balfour Historic Marker.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 21:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hope I'm now in compliance with Wikipedia's rules. If there are any further changes needed I'll be happy to make them. This is my first new article and these were the first two images I've ever uploaded here, so in future I'll know what to do - assuming I've now made the proper corrections. Thanks!

There is no hard and fast rules about when a stub becomes an article. If someone is using Wikipedia:AWB one of the things it does is to asses an article and by whatever parameter it uses it semi-automatically strips stub templates if those parameters are met. Please read Wikipedia:Stub and if you think that the article no longer is a stub then be bold and remove them. If someone reverts the removal then discuss it with them on the talk page (See WP:BRD). -- PBS (talk) 10:09, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:1936 Tupelo, MS Tornado.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — trlkly 06:48, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see that you are sill around :-) -- PBS (talk) 10:11, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you! I still spend a lot of time with wikipedia. Good to hear from you. 2602:306:C451:5A40:1053:75F2:6D7:E67A (talk) 14:44, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Berberry. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]