You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Basedch. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit _(blether) 13:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Basedch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As I have already commented at the SPI before even the checkuser was run, I apologise for my silly actions: [1]. I have already left that disruptive behaviour around three weeks ago and the sole purpose of my admission in advance was to demonstrate that I am serious about not repeating that behaviour. As I have made some really silly mistakes, It is up to admins to give me another chance. But I will surely adhere to constructive editing if given another chance. Basedch (talk) 15:30, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below. Yamla (talk) 19:35, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You acknowledged the accounts that were listed in the SPI. You neglected to mention the further twenty-or-so that I found when I ran the check. I will leave the request for another admin to review, but I do not believe that unblocking your account would be beneficial to the project. Girth Summit _(blether) 18:12, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Before posting my comment at the SPI, I read about the Checkuser because it was requested for that SPI. And I was sure that the checkuser will block my other accounts as soon as I would acknowledge my mistake. So I was not even thinking about hiding my socks. But I thought that the SPI was for the listed socks. That is why I acknowledged all of them belonging to me. I would have also mentioned my other socks if anyone had asked me about them. As I have said earlier, I had already abandoned them around 3 weeks before commenting at the SPI. I leave it for admins to decide about my unblock. And thanks to @Girth Summit: and @Yamla: for acting on my case. Basedch (talk) 02:58, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Basedch. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sinsinwar Jat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:12, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Basedch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ratan Singh Punia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bachchu Singh of Bharatpur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.jatland.com/home/Bachchu_Singh. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battles involving the Jats has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gotitbro (talk) 14:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]