User talk:BarleyButt
Welcome!
Getting StartedTutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Tips- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, Timothytyy (talk) 12:30, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I see you've added {{Unreferenced section}} tags throughout. Even if technically correct, it strikes me that this really isn't necessary: the existing {{more footnotes}} tag already covers the entire article, while making the additional point that there are sources included, just not footnoted. To reduce clutter in what is quite a short article I'm therefore inclined to remove the section tags again, but wanted first to explain why I was doing so. Best, Ingratis (talk) 09:04, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- No worries, that makes sense. Thanks for letting me know. BarleyButt (talk) 17:58, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Please be aware of the following consensus: WP:KIEV/WP:KYIV. Thanks. Mellk (talk) 22:17, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. I do not see how my edits are against consensus: this is not unambiguously historical in the same way that the Kiev Offensive or Kievan Rus' are, but I don't feel strongly enough to discuss this at length on the article page. BarleyButt (talk) 22:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Please check the
following rule of thumb for determining what is current or historical
which is 1991/95. Mellk (talk) 22:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Please check the
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.