Hello, Bagabondo,

Thank you for creating Beowulf: A New Verse Translation.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

While it is important to show that the book exists, and the topic seems to be notable, we can't use a piece of writing as a reference for an article on that piece of writing.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Utopes}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Utopes (talk) 02:34, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't know what the overall consensus is on this, but on Entertainment topics, we have a custom of placing a note on the Talk page and soliciting opinions rather than unilaterally changing the image in the infobox. Often, infobox images are arrived at after quite a lot of dispute or discussion and consensus-building, and we hope to gain WP:CONSENSUS before such a visible change to the article. As you can see, I objected to the Luke image being changed. Please consider that there might be a standing consensus before changing infobox images in the future, thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 04:42, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Elizium23, I replied on the talk page for Luke. I agree with your reason for reverting my change. Bagabondo (talk) 04:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Against the Christians

added a link pointing to Paul

Galilee

added a link pointing to Phoenician

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll explain the reversal of your latest edit on this subject, which is ultimately based on the WP:OFFTOPIC guideline. That article is about Aesop the individual; there is a separate article on Aesop's Fables and their possible origins where the claim by Babrius might belong, but even then all that stuff about Ninus and Bel seems to me of doubtful relevance. Possibly a more appropriate place might be in the article about Babrius himself since, being of 'Syrian' origin, he was closer to the story-telling tradition in that region.

As an editor, you have a duty to find the best context for claims of that kind; in this case you have to decide whether the view of Babrius was generally held (and so belongs in the fables article) or whether it was just the view of one author, in which case it would belong in the article about him. Even before this, however, you need to look at the WP:SOURCE policy, which states that the source must be accessible. In the online source you give the name of Babrius does not appear in the opening paragraphs of the article; to see the rest one needs to have a subscription and you'll find that such references are deprecated. It may be that the information is repeated by someone else, but you would need to search for it. Good luck with your research. Sweetpool50 (talk) 08:44, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your courteous reply. Sweetpool50 (talk) 21:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries are supposed to be brief. To judge by several of yours recently, if they need so much explanation then they are contentious and should be discussed on the article's Talk page first. WP relies on WP:CONSENSUS and co-operation between editors. It's now time you get to know editing policies better, of which I see you have been reminded previously. You need to be wary of getting a reputation for WP:EDITWARRING. Sweetpool50 (talk) 08:58, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Achilles and Patroclus

added a link pointing to Achaeans

Galilean

added a link pointing to Julian

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zach Hadel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zach Hadel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

‒overthrows 21:00, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Rudolf Simek into Germanic peoples. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 17:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dream Your Dream, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese South Korean.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ian Worthington, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:02, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited W. G. Hoskins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Environmental conservation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laudanum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lestat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bagabondo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ian Worthington, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to John Hurt. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 13:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Wisdom literature, would you be interested in a wikiproject on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 19:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]