Creating a separate relationships section in such a small article gives them undue weight. Moreover, a "love triangle" has not been documented. Gwen Gale 18:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

His relationships has given him worldwide notariety. Nothing in the article says that he was in a love triangle. --Baba gump 18:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He was already notable, which is why WP had an article on him before this tragedy. Meanwhile, he hasn't said anything to the media and his involvement with LN is not clear. Gwen Gale 18:30, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Lisa Nowak story really belongs in a separate section, and it should better explain why Lisa Nowak belongs in Ofelein's article. --Baba gump 20:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, the mugshot of LN has been determined not to be fair use. See my edit summary for why the caption of LN's training photo is ok. Gwen Gale 18:30, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Captions should describe the photo. The caption has nothing to do with the photo. --Baba gump 20:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've combined the captions. The caption as it is written has everything to do with the photo. Gwen Gale 23:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are now close to violating the 3 revert rule. If you violate this rule, you could be blocked. Gwen Gale 23:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't. Meanwhile I find your participation on the talk pages lacking (as in, you're reverting without discussion). Gwen Gale 06:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What would you like to discuss???? Reasons for all the edits are given in the edit summaries. --Baba gump 06:28, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Monicas Story.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]