Welcome! Hello, Ayasi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Must^TC 18:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can stay at WikiProject Turkey if you would like :) There are no obligations or anything. Cheers! Baristarim 20:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can I delete my own comments on talk pages which are not directly related to the article, or my stupid comments? Or is it forbidden?Ayasi 19:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi, generally removing comments from talk pages is considered bad practice but there are some exceptions, can you give an example? --KFP (talk | contribs) 19:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While there is no policy against it, it is often frowned upon. If the comments were clearly made in error then go ahead. If you change your mind, you can use <s> and </s> to strike through your old comments. --Selket ^Talk 19:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, those comments seemed quite harmless to me. If you change your mind about something, you can always strike out text or leave a new comment, or if the comment is clearly in the wrong place or inappropriate, you can delete it. Old comments can be archived "out of sight". For more, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Cheers, --KFP (talk | contribs) 20:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can a user make a personal attack against a vandal? For example, if a vandal makes a personal attack, and another normal user makes a personal attack against that user refering to his nation, is it bad or not? Is there any punishment for it?Ayasi 18:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPA applies to IP users as well, even if they are a WP:VANDAL. If someone is vandalising, you should place the appropriate warning tag on their user talk page. It is bad to issue personal attacks, regardless of the reason. If someone is issuing personal attacks, you could post the appropriate warning tag to their user talk page. If they keep issuing personal attacks, or if the insult reaches the level of a physical or legal threat, you might want to report that user to the appropriate administrator notice board. Hope that helps. Cheers!! Vassyana 18:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A vandal, probably from Turkey made a comment on an article. Another user changed the name of the comment as "Childish Turkish brain". Is it not a personal attack refering to Turkish nation? Is it allowable to make personal attacks agains vandals? Discussion is on Hamidian massacres article. Can I change the name, or delete all discussion since the vandal?Ayasi 18:15, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not alter other user entries on article talk pages. You may politely ask that the offending user strikes out any offensive comments. Vassyana 18:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I now realized what I have done, I restored the original title and removed my comments. Now its only a hate speech. I don't see any reasons not to remove it. It will only provoke other Armenian users to respond. Vartanm 18:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The SOURCE THAT YOU USE IS CUSTIONABLE, I I HAVE 3 SOURCES OF GREATER QUALITY THAN THEY SAY THAT MOST OF the CHILEAN PEOPLE IS SPANIARD (BLANCOS IS WHITE PEOPLE IN SPANISH)

My sources:

1,. THE WORLD VALUES WORLD CHILE 2006 [[1]]

2.- SPAIN GOV. [[2]]

3.- CIA [[3]]

Antarcticwik 16:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turks are Altai people. Hungarians are Urals with Altai mixture(Huns), they speak Ural language now, they do not use Altai, grammatically. Huns are also Altai people, so they use Attila name. Attila lived in 300-400's. In 1400's and 1500's, Turks and Hungarians made wars, some share of history started.

Hello. Well, certainly Hungarian and Turkish languages don't have many common older words because they weren't neighbors before the Ottoman empire. When Hungarians were subject to Ottomans, the situation was very different. I don't know how much there has been loaning of words between Turkish and Hungarian languages, but when Finland was under Swedish rule we got many loan words (and still afterwards). Linguistically, Finnish and Hungarian are related, but only very distantly. A bit like English and Hindi. Turkish and Uralic languages are not related, although they do resemble each other superficially (it would be great if the Ural-Altaic hypothesis was proved, but it doesn't seem likely).

It is also important to understand that linguistical relationship doesn't mean the peoples share common ancestors. Biologically Finnish people are much closely related to their neighbors than Hungarians, for example. This means also that "Uralic peoples" have no common ancestry, nor does the "Altaic peoples". Those terms mean ethnic relationship, which is a different thing. When Hungarians came to Hungary, they mixed with the local population, which in turn adopted the language from the original Hungarians. Similarly, the Huns were assimilated centuries earlier, so Hungarians have some "Hun blood" in their veins, if you like. The region which is today's Turkey has seen large number of different peoples coming and going, so current Turks are actually a mixture of several peoples. Same is true for Greeks and Middle-Eastern peoples and to lesser extent to all European peoples.

I think Finnish as a Ural language is somewhat similar to Turkish, because you write and read the same way, in both languages, for example.

So is the case with Latin, which is an Indo-European language and therefore related to English. In fact, Finnish pronuncation resembles more that of Latin than that of Turkish. The way how the languages are written doesn't mean they're related in any way.

Why is not Finnish and Turkish related, whereas Indian, Persian, English are proven to be related?

By "Indian" you probably meant Hindi? There are literally hundreds of languages in India, many which are not related to each other. English, Persian, and Hindi are shown to be relatives, because they have several similarities like common "core words" (numbers, pronouns, words for relatives etc.). There are also other ways to measure a linguistic relationship, but I'm not a linguist so I don't know all the ways how it is done. In the case of those common words it is important to check that they are not loans. As an example, here's some common words between English and Persian: brother/barādar, daughter/doxtar and father/pedar.

I hope I understood what you meant correctly.--JyriL ^talk 01:46, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to contribute to the nomination process or peer review the article? SEE: Robert College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) --Maestro 10:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ayasi! Your username, as well as the usernames of other members of Wikipedia: WikiProject Stargate, has been moved to the inactive members list, as part of a process for update the activity of the wikiproject. If you would like to continue to be an active member, please follow the instructions on the top of the participants page to add your name to the active participants list. Thanks! – sgeureka t•c 16:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers Ayasi (talk) 11:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will you support my arguement for the deletion of the Category:Anti-Armenianism that I put forward on May 1, 2009?

It is very subjective and even racist as it puts every person who questions the Armenian genocide, such as prominent academicians, who are not racist or personally against Armenian people or Armenia as an entity, along with assasins and militants.

Thank you

81.214.147.154 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.214.147.154 (talk) 18:56, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did not reply to your comment. Ayasi (talk) 23:00, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ayasi. You have new messages at Talk:Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Survivor Turkey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doğuş. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ayasi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Alinur Velidedeoğlu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Serhatserhatserhat (talk) 16:59, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alinur Velidedeoğlu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alinur Velidedeoğlu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Serhatserhatserhat (talk) 21:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alinur Velidedeoğlu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alinur Velidedeoğlu (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kadı Message 19:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]