Please add new comments at the bottom. I will reply on this page. If I wrote something on your talk page, please reply there. The idea is to make quoting easy and keep conversations in their logical order.

Older talk can be found in

• User_talk:AxelBoldt/Archive July 2001 - December 2004
• User_talk:AxelBoldt/Archive December 2004 - December 2006
• User_talk:AxelBoldt/Archive December 2006 - April 2012

Artifice Girl

En Wikipedia has turned amazingly deletionidt. German wp has this article for months. En wp has production limbo -223.39.174.71 (talk) 13:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Homeodomain fold , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going [[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Homeobox#Merge_into_Homeodomain.3F%7Chere]], and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 11:20, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Thanks for setting up that page. I am not familiar with this work otherwise.

6. De eelo et signis celestibus

I suspect you have incorporated an inadvertent typo here?
De eelo makes little sense, but de caelo would be reasonable Latin in this context.
Cheers, Varlaam (talk) 19:41, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you are right of course. I fixed it. Cheers, AxelBoldt (talk) 20:18, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I'm curious what your actual source is.

Ancient manuscript stuck on your fridge with a magnet? Varlaam (talk) 20:48, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The titles of the books are in the article by Heinz Meyer that's in the references. I can send it to you if you are interested. I just checked, he writes "De celo", but that's probably also a typo. AxelBoldt (talk) 22:35, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble.

I suggested caelo from caelum, which is Classical Latin (Cicero, Catullus).

At some time in the Dark or Middle Ages, there is a spelling transition.

Although I took 5 years of Latin, this matter was never covered at school. So I am hazy on the details.

Quite possibly, celo is correct at the time of the Fons.

(In Modern French and Spanish, we have ciel and cielo.)

But if we actually have De celo et signis celestibus on the page, anyone else with 2 years of Latin would say, "Shouldn't that be De caelo?"

Off hand, I don't know how WP handles this orthographic clash between older and newer Latin.

There is doubtless a WikiProject with an expert on this time period.

Maybe ask the guys over at lawiki?

Varlaam (talk) 14:23, 25 May 2012 (UTC) (Toronto)[reply]

I'll go with celo then, for now, since I have a peer-reviewed reference for that. I guess we could also look at the spelling in the book itself, since it is online, but I'm too lazy. I noticed that you didn't like the translation of the title on the talk page; what would be a better translation? AxelBoldt (talk) 15:01, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work fleshing out Flame (malware); in case you haven't already spotted it, you might be pleased to know your work has made the main page. Cheers, Khazar2 (talk) 09:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it looks like you did a lot more work on that article! Cheers, AxelBoldt (talk) 16:44, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AxelBoldt. Could you please double check your edit here? With the removal of the entire page-foot (categories and whatnot), it looks like your edit may have been an accidental page-chop. I'd normally revert this, but your summary indicates some possibility that what you chopped may be content in dispute. Rather than get too involved with this, I figured it may be best to send you back for a second look... just to confirm that your edit is really the edit you intended to make. Thanks. :)  -- WikHead (talk) 21:09, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, it was not intended! Cheers, AxelBoldt (talk) 21:58, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're most certainly welcome. I assumed it was an accidental chop, but was thrown off by your edit summary and didn't want to stick my face into something that may have been the subject of hot discussion. Being unfamiliar with the article and topic, it appears that I've dealt with it correctly. ;) Have yourself a great day AxelBoldt, stay well, and happy editing! :)  -- WikHead (talk) 23:29, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AxelBoldt. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Quisquiliae (talk) 10:47, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the area? You're invited to the Great American Wiknic.

Place: near Minnehaha Falls at Minnehaha Park, Minneapolis
Date: Saturday, July 7, 2012 (rain date July 8)
Time: 12–3 pm

• Accessible from the Minnehaha Park light rail station, bus, walk, bike, or car
• If driving, free parking available at 46th Ave. S, and pay parking in the park
• Food and drink options nearby, or bring your own... maybe even to share!

See the meetup talk page for more. —innotata 00:01, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Agriculturalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Legalism

Cavity magnetron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Impedance

Gaafar Nimeiry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chevron

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Author/AxelBoldt My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address recently edited an article on Artificial insemination. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article and or other health-related articles. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please reply via my talk page or e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance. Hydra Rain (talk) 12:23, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kuramo Beach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bar Beach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 'False positives' scandal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Axel,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more. I'm currently inviting people whose names that I recognize from around the project, please feel free to invite anyone else you like.

Best regards, -- Hex [^t/_c] 11:26, 27 September 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Giovanni Filippo Ingrassia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plague (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:56, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the area? You are invited to Wikipedia Loves Libraries in Minneapolis.

Hennepin County Library's Special Collections is hosting a Minneapolis history editathon on November 3. Help increase the depth of information on Minneapolis history topics by using materials in the Minneapolis Collection. Find your own topics to edit or work from a list developed by Special Collections librarians.

There will also be an intro for people new to Wikipedia, and tours of Special Collections.

Where: Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
Special Collections (4th floor)
When: 10am-4:30pm, Saturday, November 3, 2012

For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page. —innotata 14:54, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neuropeptide Y, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fruit fly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:52, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ultraviolet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Photoreceptor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shanti Devi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shanti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mitchell's embedding theorem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Projective (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember how exactly I ended up on your User page, but I noticed that you write there that "every word I write is by default, and always, in the public domain", while at the bottom of your uni-paderborn.de pages (for example, Winning the Shell Game), it says "This material is available under your choice of the OPL or GFDL." This seems contradictory. --82.170.113.123 (talk) 01:04, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you mean to say "every word I write on Wikipedia [...]"? --82.170.113.123 (talk) 18:41, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Romer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TED (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited GF(2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ideal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:16, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you are the originator of the excellent article Olber's paradox. Having just read the current version of that article rather closely, I became curious to find out who started it. When I found and read your first version, I realized that it could serve as a good summary of the current version (both versions being, in my opinion, unusually good articles). But it also strikes me that your first version might be considered in some sense better, because of covering the ground while still being so compact.

There is different paradox (not Olber's), or at least a puzzle lurking here: articles are usually improved over time, but also lose brevity, an important virtue. This leads me to wonder where the Wikipedia process might be headed in the long term. Will many articles eventually become too complete, and therefore too long, for most readers to absorb? Dratman (talk) 02:59, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's a danger. Ideally, every article would consist of a compact summary before the table of contents, followed by an exhaustive elaboration with several sections. Alternatively, an initial Overview section could summarize the rest of a long article. In this fashion, Wikipedia should contain a concise and essentially self-contained encyclopedia-within-the-encyclopedia. AxelBoldt (talk) 17:55, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree with your point about a summary or Overview being the best possible solution to complexity-creep.
• However, I do not think the existing style of summary is likely to blossom unless writing and improving summaries becomes a project.
• Would you consider transforming your original version of the Olber's Paradox article into a summary of the current version? I really like that article. Dratman (talk) 01:33, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'll look into it. AxelBoldt (talk) 17:21, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask a favor please. When you are doing an edit please make sure you write an edit summary just so we know what you did. Thanks. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 02:57, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, sorry about that. AxelBoldt (talk) 03:47, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There has been a reopened discussion ongoing at Talk:First Opium War#Merge discussion to merge the contents of Opium Wars into First Opium War and Second Opium War. A consensus seems to have been reached among all the users who contributed to the lede/Opium Wars#Overview section, and merging may be imminent. You have been identified as a major contributor of the article about to be abolished (see: User:Kiyoweap/Opium Wars) and thus are welcomed to participate in the merge, especially in the sections which you have contributed. Or, any other input under the Merge discussion thread given above would be appreciated. Thanks. --Kiyoweap (talk) 04:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know; I'm sure you'll do the right thing. AxelBoldt (talk) 05:44, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for clearing that up :) Rschwieb (talk) 13:31, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Boldt, as you are a highly respected long-time editor, I was hoping you might be willing to lend some support for the inclusion of the later history of one of #1 Japanese junior idol group's entry into the adult actress / pornography video industry. The problem is that the fan base (including on WP) is emotionally invested in the idea of squeaky-clean innocent girl idols, and dont' want to face the reality that these girls are on extremely controlling, extremely poorly-paying contracts. Britney Spears, by being the #1 pop idol in America, is a millionaire several times over. But the AKB48 girls, after being "graduated" (or removed from the pop scene in a formal ceremony), often times have little or no savings whatsoever, and so one has turned into 2010's #1 porn star of the year. If you can weigh in, even though this isn't techncially your area of expertise, I'm sure your prestige will carry some strong weight. -WikiSkeptic (talk) 02:39, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paysafecard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ransomware (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacobian matrix and determinant, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Scalar and Vector (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota meetups.

To kick-off monthly meetups in the Twin Cities, two events will be held in Special Collections at Minneapolis Central Library this summer. These are mostly planned as opportunities for Wikipedians to discuss editing, but all are welcome!

Special Collections contains many valuable historical resources, including the Minneapolis Collection, consisting of files on hundreds of topics related to Minneapolis from neighborhoods to politicians (it's best to call or email in advance to request materials). Free wifi and several public computers are available.

Place: Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
Special Collections (4th floor)
Dates: Saturday, June 1
Saturday, July 6
Time: 12:30pm–2:30pm+

For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.

This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. —innotata 14:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Accord on Factory and Building Safety in Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the area? You're invited to the Great American Wiknic.

Place: north of Minnehaha Falls in Minnehaha Park, Minneapolis
Date: Saturday, June 22, 2012
Time: 12–4 pm

• Accessible from the Minnehaha Park METRO station, bus, walk, bike, or car
• If driving, free parking available on 46th Ave. S, and pay parking in the park
• Food and drink options nearby, or bring your own... maybe even to share!

For more, and to sign up (encouraged, not required) go to the meetup talk page.

This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. —innotata 03:10, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I found your user page while doing some wikiarcheology. I have restored all of its earliest surviving revisions from old copies of the Wikipedia database, so they are available to everyone now. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 12:48, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind. Have you just added them to this page's history, or are they stored somewhere else? AxelBoldt (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the extremely belated reply, but I *just* got this message. I just added the revisions to your user page history, as you may have figured out in the meantime. I've just imported an old edit you made to the 8th century]] page, which reminded me of your username. Graham87 11:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Calcium channel blocker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vene (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jharia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota monthly meetup on August 3.

Place: Lavvu Coffee House
813 4th St SE, Minneapolis 55414
Date: Saturday, August 3
Time: 1:00pm-3:00pm+

For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.

This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list.

—innotata 23:37, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baibars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crusader (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:12, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kaaba may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Mecca is considered by Muslims to stretch back thousands of years to the time of Sayyidna Ibrahim ([[Abraham in Islam|Abraham]).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited F-Droid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:02, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't wish to be as radical as what is stated Naked_assertion but I have not found practical world application of Floor and Ceiling Functions. The function is often found in Postal Rate slab, Income tax slab, Goods and Service Tax slab, Examination Grade, etc. I have even found this function in jumping of electrons from one orbital to another in a bound state. What I am asking is not these real-world scenarios where the functions are witnessed, but cases where properties of these functions are utilised to perform predictable forcasts or results. Bkpsusmitaa (talk) 06:23, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages JCB and LPP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Earthflight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devil ray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to My Friend Walter may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Bess sees [[Sir Walter Raleigh]] in London and Walter asked [[[[Bess Throckmorton|Bess]] if he could come and live on her estate. (But remember he is a ghost and

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Herr Boldt! And happy new year! I am editor Colton Cosmic. Excuse me for block evading via raw IP on your talkpage. I claim to been non-policy and abusively blocked. I am looking for an administrator willing to do a fresh review, and one that favors evidence over accusations. Why you? It is January 1, and thus the year's begin, so I looked for an administrator whose username began with the alphabet's begin, and came across you. The background is I tried the standard appeal processes but I found them staffed by the same people hyperactively blocking editors, as if were all some online game where they increased their scores. I was blocked for socking, but never has evidence been provided of this. Much has been made of suspicion.

I had a single prior account that I abandoned for privacy reasons, never going back. In that account I was the original author of probably four or five articles. I contributed greatly to many more. After a negative online experience, I recognized I wanted a degree of online anonymity. So I switched to a new account. I believe this to be authorized under Wikipedia policy WP:CLEANSTART. I was 100 percent straightforward about it in my first edit[1]. My straightforwardness ironically led to my being blocked as a sockpuppet. This was the charge leveled by Timotheus Canens in May 2012. He permanently blocked me via button click without warning or explanation. I had edited Wikipedia making contributions, I say solid ones, for about six years. After that a great number of the WP:AN/ANI regulars descended on my talkpage, making all manner of accusations.

I appealed then to Arbcom. Silktork denied the appeal without explanation. Much, much later he said that he suspected me to be some notorious sanctioned user. I am not that user. He would not provide evidence or any reasoning, though he said that his suspicion was "reasonable," repeating the word "reasonable" three or four times. My position is that Arbcom's *declining to unblock* is not itself a *block* and thus I am free to appeal to any administrator in accordance with WP:UNBLOCK. An arbitrator himself told me this, though I remember not which one. He said "Arbcom has no monopoly on appeals." Okay, I have perhaps typed too much here already. I do not want to trap you in some super-long text. If you unblock me merely at my talkpage, I will answer any questions you have (and certainly cease block evasion via raw IP). Colton Cosmic.

PS: To be clear, I have made similar requests of many administrators, who decline for various reasons, most often for hierarchy but others for "too much trouble" and "I don't want to get involved." It is I think a less controversial thing to unblock me at my talkpage for further evaluation, but if you end up believing in my innocence and unblock generally, that will be a very unpopular action among several admins and arbs. Consider this fair warning then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.69.69.41 (talk) 18:50, 1 January 2014, (UTC+0)

Thanks but I'm not interested to get involved. AxelBoldt (talk) 05:43, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I need help, but there are others and I am not upset about your decision. I looked at your "real names proposal" essay yesterday. It was good to read. People should try to improve the system. I would be in favor of a policy of Wikipedia administrators personally identifying, because they exercise control over others. I do not know if I'd support real naming of common editors, but if it were done administrators first, we'd gain experience on the effects of such a policy, and be better able to judge where to go from there. If you want to look at a policy proposal I favor, it's the "universal optout" for biographical articles:[2]. Silktork stomped out that initiative because I touched it. Colton Cosmic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.69.69.41 (talk) 09:16, 2 January 2014 (UTC+0)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henryk Tauber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota meetup in commemoration of Wikipedia Day.

• Place: Seward Cafe
  

2129 E Franklin Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55404

• Date: Saturday, January 18, 2014
  
• Time: noon

For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.

This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. —innotata 04:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi sir I am nehal Dave from India. I want to help from you regarding wikipedia. I want to make a weather table in sanskrit wikipedia (https://sa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%96%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%83%E0%A4%B7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A0%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D).

I have read many tutorials regarding weather table but I couldn't made that. If you will help me then my big problem will be solved. Thank you..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by NehalDaveND (talk • contribs) 04:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for using VisualEditor! Having editors use it is the best way for the Wikimedia Foundation to develop it into the best tool it can be.

While we always welcome general feedback (please report any issues in Bugzilla in the "VisualEditor" product or drop your feedback on the central feedback page on MediaWiki.org), the developers are especially interested right now in feedback on the special character inserter. This new tool is used for inserting special characters (including symbols like ₥, IPA pronunciation symbols, mathematics symbols, and characters with diacritics). It is intended to help people whose computers do not have good character inserters. For example, many Mac users prefer to use the extensive "Special Characters..." tool present at the bottom of the Edit menu in all applications or to learn the keyboard shortcuts for characters like ñ and ü.

The current version of the special characters tool in VisualEditor is very simple and very basic. It will be getting a lot of work in the coming weeks and months. It does not contain very many character sets at this time. (The specific character sets can be customized at each Wikipedia, so that each project could have a local version with the characters it wants.) But the developers want your ideas at this early stage about ways that the overall concept could be improved. I would appreciate your input on this question, so please try out the character inserter and tell me what changes to the design would (or would not!) best work for you.

Issues you might consider:

• How often do you normally use Wikipedia's character inserters?
• Which character sets are useful to you? Should it include all 18 of the character sets provided in the wikitext editor's newer toolbar at the English Wikipedia, the 10 present in the older editor toolbar, or some other combination of character sets?
• How many special characters would you like to see at one time?
  • Should there be a "priority" or "favorites" section for the 10 or 12 characters that most editors need most often? Is it okay if you need an extra click to go beyond the limited priority set?
  • How should the sections be split up? Should they be nested? Ordered?
  • How should the sections be navigated? Should there be a drop-down? A nested menu?
• The wikitext editor has never included many symbols and characters, like ℗ and ♀. Do you find that you need these missing characters? If the character inserter in VisualEditor includes hundreds or thousands of special characters, will it be overwhelming? How will you find the character you want? What should be done for users without enough space to display more than a few dozen characters?
• Should the character inserter be statically available until dismissed? Should it hover near the mouse? Should it go away on every selection or 10 seconds after a selection with no subsequent ones?
• Some people believe that the toolbar already has too many options—how would you simplify it?

The developers are open to any thoughts on how the special character inserter can best be developed, even if this requires significant changes. Please leave your views on the central feedback page, or, if you'd prefer, you can contact me directly on my talk page. It would be really helpful if you can tell me how frequently you need to use special characters in your typical editing and what languages or other special characters are important to you.

Thank you again for your work with VisualEditor and for any feedback you can provide. I really do appreciate it.

P.S. You might be interested in the current ideas about improving citations, too. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:20, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bhagavad Gita, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gergonne point. Since you had some involvement with the Gergonne point redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. � (talk) 23:30, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Els von Eystett, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Laurel and Carot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Lantus, wir hatten uns am ersten Abend der Wikimania getroffen. Es geht also um die Accounts en:user:Lantus und en:user:Clausthal. Ich nehme an, die Edits zwischen 2009 und 2012 von Lantus sind von Dir, die aus dem Jahr 2006 aber nicht? Woher hattest Du denn zwischen 2009 und 2012 das en:user:Lantus Passwort, und hast Du es heute noch? (Bitte Antwort auf en:user talk:AxelBoldt, ich lese hier so selten...) Ciao, AxelBoldt (Diskussion) 19:55, 14. Aug. 2014 (CEST)

Guten Tag Axel, heute habe ich noch an unser Gespräch von voriger Woche gedacht und überlegt, ob Du weiterkommst. Ja, die Edits von 2009 bis 2012 sind definitiv von mir. Das Passwort habe ich offensichtlich damals durch Ausprobieren (eins von etwa einem Dutzend in meinem Repertoire) wieder herausgefunden). Sicherlich habe ich es heute noch unverändert, eine schnelle Probe war soeben nicht erfolgreich! An die Edits vor 8 Jahren kann ich mich nicht mehr erinnern, sie sind für meine Edits eher unwahrscheinlich. Danke für Deinen Support! Gruss Clausthal (talk) 18:15, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Noch eine Frage dazu: Kannst Du sehen, welche eMail-Adresse hinterlegt ist? Unter Umständen ist die nämlich nicht mehr aktiv. Clausthal (talk) 22:01, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tach Axel, Du hast gesehen, dass auf meiner Benutzerseite ein probater Erklärungsversuch hinzukam? Clausthal (talk) 09:38, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Simplicial set may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear AxelBoldt, I am a French student in an engineering school and I am currently working on CFD equations. I want to solve the following equation: (x^2-4*x+6)*exp(x)=y (1) It looks a bit like the following equation: x*exp(x)=y (2) The solution of equation (2) is: x=LambertW(y) I think the solution of equation (1) uses the function LambertW. Since you have more knowledge than me in particular about the function LambertW, I ask you this question: Can you solve the equation (1)? Kindest regards, Jacob Safra — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacobsafra (talk • contribs) 21:41, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you can solve that equation with the Lambert function. An equation of the form x^2*exp(x)=y can be solved (by taking square roots) to get x=2*LambertW(sqrt(y)/2), but the same trick does not seem to work for your equation. AxelBoldt (talk) 16:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia bugs. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia bugs redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 06:22, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution to this World Chess Championship 2014. I wanted to show you what tool we use in the Hebrew wikipedia to show the games. [3]. You can also annotate the games using this tool, and the best is that the reader can sit down and see the game playing by itself like in the chess sites. You are invited to install the tool in the English wikipedia! --Yoavd (talk) 06:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Klein surface

added links pointing to Fixed point, Scheme, Connected component, Annulus and Involution

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Algebraic function field, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ideal (mathematics) and Regular map. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Algebraic curve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regular map. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear AxelBoldt,

I see that you were the original author of the article Scheme (mathematics). Your first version of the article contains a number of interesting claims that are not referenced, in particular that Krull already studied the prime spectrum of arbitrary rings in the 1930s. Would you be able to point me to a reference for this? (I appreciate that the article was written >10 years ago, so please forgive this extremely late request!)

Thanks, and best wishes, 2001:630:301:3033:A1CD:E364:6591:C6AC (talk) 10:02, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't the original author, I just contributed to the article. The Krull claim isn't from me. The very early history of old articles is unfortunately often incorrect, because the software and database structure changed a couple of times, article histories had to be reimported from database dumps, and this wasn't always done correctly and completely. AxelBoldt (talk) 17:04, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see; thanks for the information. I am a little disturbed to learn that article histories are not always reliable! All the best, 2001:630:301:3033:C114:7BA5:DBD1:2CA6 (talk) 14:27, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gastropexy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diaphragm. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Axel! Thank you for your many contributions.

I spent some time reviewing your edit to Salton Sea which seems okay, except I am still wondering why you removed the phrase Like Death Valley, it is below sea level. The WP:EDITSUMMARY is an excellent place to provide such rationale. Alas, it looks like you rarely provide edit summaries. As a fellow mop holder, it wouldn't be a bad example to do a better job of filling in edit summaries. Thanks! —EncMstr (talk) 19:08, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right, I will try to do a better job filling in edit summaries. I removed the Death Valley sentence because it was repetitious; the next sentence also talked about Death Valley. Cheers, AxelBoldt (talk) 00:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexander Grothendieck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lasserre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Strong measure zero set, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interval. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Discrete valuation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Function field. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rotation group SO(3), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compact. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see an experienced knowledgeable editor being back in action. (I mostly recognize your signature from talk pages dating back to the stone ages) YohanN7 (talk) 17:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Although I wasn't really gone, I have just edited outside of math and haven't participated in any policy discussions. Cheers, AxelBoldt (talk) 17:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AxelBoldt,

The Editing team is asking for your help with VisualEditor. I am contacting you because you were one of the very first testers of VisualEditor, back in 2012 or early 2013. Please tell them what they need to change to make VisualEditor work better for you. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too. 

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Unsubscribe from this list • Sign up for VisualEditor's multilingual newsletter • Translate the user guide

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:12, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ron Barrier has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Taste my Falanghina (talk) 23:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I've been doing some research into encyclopedism and encyclopedists and came across your name when I got to Interpedia (via the usenet proposal/RfD). The discussions are, of course, fairly well documented but I'm curious to get your take on what motivations you perceived in those who worked on the project. There's a lot of evident early-Internet enthusiasm, explicit support for openness and access, and other such sentiments that carried over to Wikipedia, but were there other motivations or influences in play? Was this a political project for anyone? Did some people expect to make money through it? Any information you could provide would be appreciated. Thanks for your time. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! If you have just read through the old Interpedia archives you will definitely know a lot more about the project than I can remember now. I don't think it was a political project for anyone, except to the extent that providing free access to knowledge is a political project. Financial motives never came up as far as I recall. In fact, the early wikipedia.com had much more of a commercial flavor to it: it was run on servers owned by a private company, and the possibility of running ads on the site was implicitly there from the start (until Jimbo explicitly decided against it). I don't think we envisaged a central role for collaborative editing in Interpedia - the planned project was more alike Everything2 or Google's (now defunct) Knol project. Cheers, AxelBoldt (talk) 01:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I invite you to edit Calicut Review — Preceding unsigned comment added by EditorFromAsia (talk • contribs) 14:05, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Minneapolis Institute of Art edit-a-thon

Date: Saturday, October 24, 2015, 12pm–4pm Location: Minneapolis Institute of Art Friends Community Room, 2400 Third Avenue South, Minneapolis Sponsor: Minneapolis Institute of Art You are invited to attend an Art+Feminism edit-a-thon at Minneapolis Institute of Art which will be held on Saturday, October 24, 2015. This editing event is dedicated to improving and increasing the presence of cultural, historic, and artistic information on Wikipedia pertaining to women artists. For more information and to RSVP: → click here ←, you may register online for the event or call (612) 870-6323 --gobonobo + c 20:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get me wrong, but I discovered your website and you are not a near-native English speaker in my eyes. --64.145.94.65 (talk) 16:03, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently rewrote the halteres page, however this is my very first wiki edit. I noticed that you had addressed some issues with this page in the past, so I was hoping that you could check it out to make sure everything was alright. I just didn't want to take down the "This article has multiple issues" box if there was something obvious I was missing. Thank you!!

Alex Yarger (talk) 20:39, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, wonderful article, thanks a lot! Much much better than before. I have removed the issues box. Personally, I liked the previous image better because it clearly showed the shape and location of halteres, but I defer to your judgement. Cheers, AxelBoldt (talk) 22:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I noticed you created the original page on AIML and was wondering if you might weigh in on my (very first) Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Pandorabots

I've spent the better part of three years researching chatbots, chatbot platforms, and scripting languages, and wanted to try my hand at expanding Wikipedia since these topics seem under-represented, even though chatbots are generally making a come back (as far as the press is concerned). Following a livechat with the help desk (after which I've removed portions of my current draft and sketchier sources), I thought I'd ask any other bot or AIML enthusiasts if they want to help on the draft.

Thanks in advance for reading this and any contributions you feel up to making! Botxpert (talk) 00:40, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the area? You're invited to a
Minnesota Wikipedia Meetup
	Date: Saturday, 30 January 2016
	Time: noon until whenever
	Place: Nina's Café in Blair Flats   165 Western Avenue, St. Paul 44°56′47.25″N 93°6′58.5″W / 44.9464583°N 93.116250°W / 44.9464583; -93.116250 (Click here for details and to R.S.V.P.)

The Loft Literary Center edit-a-thon

Date: Thursday, February 11, 2016, 6–8pm Location: Loft Literary Center, 1011 S Washington Ave, Room 203, Minneapolis Sponsor: The Loft Literary Center Hello AxelBoldt! You are invited to attend an edit-a-thon at the Loft Literary Center which will be held on Thursday, February 11, 2016. This editing event is dedicated to improving and increasing the presence of cultural, historic, and artistic information on Wikipedia pertaining to artists from marginalized communities. Please bring a laptop. Refreshments will be provided. For more information and to RSVP: → click here ←

We have also recently formed a user group for Minnesota editors. If you would like to join, please add your name to our page on meta. Thank you, gobonobo ^{+ c} 21:25, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What are you motivations behind sharing vast information about the sciences to the world? ZeroDaVinci (talk) 13:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If you have a little bit of time, I would interested in your thoughts about why Wikimoney didn't catch on much, or how it got discontinued and the prospects for revival. I searched in the archives here and on the Wikimoney page and didn't really find an answer. You can also email me if you wish to do it that way. Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 16:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't really know why it didn't catch on. I still think it was a good idea. (Famous last words...) Maybe the name was suboptimal; "wiki credits" or "appreciation points" or something like that would have been better. It could also be that people edit mainly out of an intrinsic motivation and need; maybe they don't like to be told what to do, because then it turns into a chore. Lastly, the system wasn't very visible: if you had missed the initial announcement, you'd never even hear about it. Maybe a user space template displaying the user's points (and/or point earning history) might give some visibility. Cheers, AxelBoldt (talk) 13:44, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Ilich Ramirez Sanchez.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:50, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AxelBoldt. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grigori Perelman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mikhail Gromov. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Confer In E-Mail debate, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Confer In E-Mail debate and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Confer In E-Mail debate during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 01:30, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AxelBoldt.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AxelBoldt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

Hello, AxelBoldt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Here's an event happening soon. Might you be able to make it? Jonathunder (talk) 15:10, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the area? You're invited to a
Minnesota Wikipedia Meetup
	Saturday, December 17, 2016
	Meet in the MIA Main Lobby at 1 p.m.
	2400 Third Avenue South, Minneapolis

Hi, I’m just a little annoyer sending You an annoying message to annoy You with a pointless notification — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.28.155.211 (talk) 18:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Please come and join if you can!

In the area? You're invited to
Wikipedia as Social Activism
	Saturday, April 15, 2017
	St. Cloud State University Library at noon
	720 4th Avenue South, St. Cloud

Shaded0 (talk) 23:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

For piping "real line" to Real-life experience (transgender) in a math article.[4] I saw the fix [5], checked the page history to look for more vandalism and was surprised to find you. I guess you copy-pasted from the wrong place. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:31, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I was using the Visual Editor to add the link (highlighting "real line" and hitting Ctrl-K), and I must have picked the wrong choice from the popup list. AxelBoldt (talk) 09:36, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=1R1zIzg92FHco4d_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_2tmVULAnNloTRfT&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 21:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disclaimer: I am new to Wikipedia and don't know how this place works. This request concerns a page on Hinduism. If you believe that this issue does not come under your domain, then please don't ignore this; rather suggest the name of another admin who CAN handle this issue.

I wish to inform you that there has been an "edit war" between me and the user Ms Sarah Welch (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ms_Sarah_Welch). I put "edit war in quotes because it got resolved pretty quickly, and was in no way an actual conflict(look here-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Isha_Upanishad ,if you don't believe me). I only started nine days ago and she has been an established user for a long time. The reason for the "war" was that I had quoted from a non-RS based source, which was the version of the Isopanisad published by the Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, which is also the publisher of THE MOST widely read edition of the Bhagavad Gita (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhaktivedanta_Book_Trust), in the whole world. Therefore, in no way do I consider this version to be a poorly known version. The other editors who have come before me have quoted the book, and the book is included in the list of references in the article itself! Still, I agree that mantras can be interpreted in many ways, but at the very least, I should be able to post the original mantras, IN SANSKRIT, without translation. The original mantras of course, cannot differ. Only the translation differs. Therefore, I request that you have a word with her about this issue. While I am in no way question the fact that she is an established editor, I will disagree with her over this issue. The "edit war" took place 9 days ago, and during this time, I have put much thought into this. I also believe that the opinion of other editors should also be taken, and that Ms Sarah Welch should not have a Monopoly over the page. I expect a courteous response, admin. Thanks, Lie Cleaner HK. PS: If you think that you are not the person I should be asking, then please suggest another admin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lie Cleaner HK (talk • contribs) 12:26, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Axel, there is a discussion at Talk:Group action#Baseline dot notation concerning (in part) an edit that you made back in 2012. I was wondering if you would like to contribute. Thanks. --Bill Cherowitzo (talk) 18:00, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AxelBoldt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you had a comment on the Talk page of Set_theory_(music) asking if it was OR. I had the same question as I looked at it. Your comment seemed pretty dated though and there are several references and I do think there are some interesting things one can say about set theory and music. Although I checked one of the sources, a book by Howard Hanson and I did a search for "set " and only found one reference and it had nothing to do with set theory. So that makes me wonder about the other ones which I don't think are online. If you think the issue was resolved and there are good references I'll just drop it but if you still think it may be an issue I will follow up and get some of the references from the library to see if they really support the claims in the article. Just FYI, my background is I'm very strong in set theory, I'm taking a class right now on Modal Logic and I also know how to read music and know some very basic music theory. Cheers. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 23:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Hi[reply]

Hi @MadScientistX11: I just looked through the article again and also found the Rahn reference here; I'm now satisfied that some music theorists do indeed talk about "sets" and even "set theory" and I don't have any problems with the article or title anymore. Cheers, AxelBoldt (talk) 14:29, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yhanks. I haven't edited in a while, I forgot if technically we aren't supposed to communicate with individual editors but have all the discussion on the talk page. If I violated any policies contacting you directly sorry about that. I did find one thing in the article that I thought wasn't supported so I posted that on the article talk page after leaving you this message. You can see it here: Is Opening Statement OR? I think it's a minor issue the more I think about it and there has been some good discussion so far, but I do think that statement could be cleaned up a bit, but in general sounds like the article is sound. Thanks for the prompt reply. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 18:42, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there are any rules about discussing article content at editors' talk pages. Cheers, AxelBoldt (talk) 14:52, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		The E=mc² Barnstar
		for your many mathematical contributionsReaperLF (talk) 21:06, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

16:06, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! AxelBoldt (talk) 23:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hroðulf/Sophie (software), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hroðulf/Sophie (software) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Hroðulf/Sophie (software) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 20:16, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•

Ueb aschebs and way ok

• — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.54.70.133 (talk) 01:26, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	To the amazing author who started the Hubble Space Telescope wiki page. I commend you. Rexlikescheese (talk) 21:02, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! So long ago! AxelBoldt (talk) 22:00, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How did you gain sysop status? I'm asking because I'm unable to find a RFA of you. VibeScepter (talk) (contributions) 20:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In the early days there weren't any RFAs; everybody who was active and trusted by Jimbo became an admin, it was considered "no big deal". See Wikipedia:Administrators#History. AxelBoldt (talk) 22:27, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Descriptive knowledge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article looks like an essay with zero citations despite open requests for over a year. It is not a distinct field of knowledge

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ---Snowded ^TALK 06:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Descriptive knowledge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Descriptive knowledge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ---Snowded ^TALK 05:40, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AxelBoldt. Please excuse me if I am doing something improper, as I am new to Wikipedia. I am contacting you because you are a speaker of both English and French. I have created the page Draft:Pierre_Jovanovic nearly 2 months ago, and I am waiting for a review. Could you please consider having a look at it ? And again, please excuse me if my request is improper. I am learning the ropes. Best regards. Micha Jo (talk) 17:09, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Micha, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have been working on other things lately, so I'm afraid I won't be able to help with your draft. All the best, AxelBoldt (talk) 12:04, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AxelBoldt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AxelBoldt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Exploration of the Unknown
		I hereby award you the Exploration of the Unknown award! You are being recognized for your courage and willingness to test a feature, gadget, or tool in development and for the constructive feedback you provided. Hey AxelBoldt, thank you for your constructive feedback on the latest design prototype from the Advanced Mobile Contributions project. Your collaboration is appreciated. We'll have more project updates soon so stay tuned : ) AHollender (WMF) (talk) 21:56, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, You might like to know that there is some discussion about the intended meaning of one of your edits, at https://mathoverflow.net/questions/316649/upgrade-adjunction-to-equivalence

Could you please return to 'talk:Multinomial theorem', particularly to talk:Multinomial_theorem#Duh...?_Just_like_that?_Created_by_one_stroke_of_His_magic?
I noticed that Multinomial Theorem has no section on its history of development. A reference/treatise where it was first mentioned and developed. I don't have resources available to develop it myself. So was looking to draw the attention of the original authors to improve the article further.
Bkpsusmitaa (talk) 03:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't been to one of these in years but think I'll go this time. Would enjoy seeing you there. UninvitedCompany 13:59, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Axel, bei Arbeiten am de.wp Artikel (die ungeplant etwas ausgeufert sind;) bin ich über zwei sehr ausführliche Berichte auf Englisch gestolpert und dachte dann, vielleicht könntest Du das für den Artikel hier gebrauchen.^^

• Thirty years in search of justice
• The Kalinka Affair

Liebe Grüße --Rabbid (talk) 23:35, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danke schön, den ersten kenne ich schon, den zweiten werde ich gleich durchlesen! AxelBoldt (talk) 01:57, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you have time, could you check my edits of the explanation undeneath the graph for correctness and clarity? Thanks!Rich (talk) 01:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do you know if the possible method of doubling the median serial number is an okay way to estimate the number of tanks? If so, should it be mentioned?Rich (talk) 01:40, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Richard L. Peterson: Your edit has clarified the caption considerably, thanks! It took me a while to understand the Bayesian vs. frequentist graphs, but it all makes sense, especially with the given example. Unfortunately, I don't know how the estimate of doubling the median compares to the given estimates, but I'd assume it's worse. If you can find a reference that mentions it, we could certainly include it. Cheers, AxelBoldt (talk) 20:31, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for kind words!..i’ve been dry running the two estimates with N=511 and k=4 by flipping coins, and as you said doubling the median is indeed worse than the frequentist formula x=max + max/4 -1. I haven’t plugged in any of the more complicated formulas on the page. cheers,Rich (talk) 01:48, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info of over a year ago. Someone was overly picky again, too bad since info certainly was not invented. I will keep it in mind and go at it when I have time.Sundar1 (talk) 18:36, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the picture shows Methyl-glucoside. You are listed as an author — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18F:902:E840:B076:2C07:818:78C (talk) 05:26, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, the image File:Ethyl-glucoside.png shows ethyl-glucoside (there's a chain of two carbons attached two the sugar group). AxelBoldt (talk) 06:48, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, my mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18F:902:E840:3C27:1C98:26CB:B36E (talk) 21:33, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Goertzel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Goertzel (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:56, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Back in 2003, you added to Chaitin's constant the following revision: "Furthermore, Ω is a normal number." At the time, it was not unusual for facts like this to be added without a source. However, the page has since kept that fact unsourced for the last 16 years. When I came across it today, I was surprised, as I was not previously aware that it was normal. So I tried to do a quick search for a source on this. I found a paper by Brendan Saxburg that just mentions it as a known property of Ω, but he also gave no source. I see some papers by Cristian Calude that also mention it as normal, but again, I found no actual paper establishing it as normal. What I actually found when doing this search were several posts on both math and cs stackexchange where people are citing the wikipedia article's claim that it is normal and asking why this is so. ex 1,ex 2, ex 3

Now I don't doubt that Ω is normal. I certainly trust your and others expertise on a topic I know almost nothing about. But I was hoping that you could add a source to this on the wikipedia page for Chaitin's constant, given that you're the person who added this claim originally. I think having a source would help with the constant stream of questions on stackexchange and the misunderstandings that arise like in this numberphile video. Of course, you should not feel an obligation to honor this request; after all, I'm complaining about something that has sat there for 16 years without a source. If it's inconvenient for you to provide a source, I'm sure it won't actually matter all that much if it waits until some grad student or other finally adds it in one day. It's gone this long; I'm sure it can go a little longer. (c: — Eric Herboso 16:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Eric Herboso: thanks for alerting me to this. I don't remember where I read that Ω is normal, and indeed it is not normal in all cases. As your math.stackexchange ex 1 convincingly shows: it's normal only if you pick the right encoding for Turing machines. I'll see if I can find a source for this claim that's not math.stackexchange. Cheers, AxelBoldt (talk) 18:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that the definition used in the stackexchange post is slightly different from the one used in our article. The statements in our article were correct and I have now added some references. AxelBoldt (talk) 21:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:40, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear AxelBoldt,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 16:37, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you please help me to move an userspace draft about an award-winning composer into article space? The draft is about Wojciech Waleczek—a succesful pianist from Poland whose numerous achievements deserve to be celebrated with his own Wikipedia page. He took 3rd prize at the Premio Mario Zanfi competition and was the absolute winner of the 4th Franz Liszt National Piano Competition—to name just a few of his accomplishments. Mr Waleczek already has his articles on German and Polish Wikipedia. Hope to hear back from you. Regards, AngelOfDestiny (talk) 14:41, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Guzman Iparraguirre 2004.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:16, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, AxelBoldt. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Mjs1991 (talk) 10:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bianchi classification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page General line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Oldest admin in Wikipedia 𝒞𝒽ℯℯ𝓈ℯ𝒹ℴℊ (talk) 13:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! AxelBoldt (talk) 15:26, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I award you this Man City barnstar for being the first non-IP user to edit the Man City page. Man City are my favorite team, so being the first non-IP user to edit its page deserves a barnstar in my book! 2601:643:8101:64E1:9977:C854:FCD9:7523 (talk) 03:48, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, AxelBoldt, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 00:44, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited San Juan Massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oruro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Afternoon!!! I need to you to review the article Kaššaya. Please. MazaresX9 (talk) 18:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AxelBoldt. First I just wanted to say, as literally the longest serving admin here, you are basically a Wikipedia God and your tireless work speaks for itself. Thank you for all you have done. I also come here with a question that I am hoping your vast knowledge and experienced can help with.

When it comes to conflicts and conflict resolution about editing/adding new content, I was wondering what the procedure is for what has happened in this instance. What has happened is, I made an edit that I thought would improve an article (with the plan of editing a bunch of articles in the same category to standardise them). Someone else, almost immediately, reverted it. I started a dialog with that person (I am a reformed character and I believe I should not be treated based on my past blunders and transgressions) and had a few back and forths with them. After my last post raising good and valid points they went completely silent. Does this count as consensus? Do I have permission to edit again?

I would really appreciate if you could help me in this, I know you are a very busy individual, as I just want to make Wikipedia and the wider World a more informed place (even if it is just within my extremely specific sphere of interest). Thank you for your time. Justgravy (talk) 13:07, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kwari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dominicmgm (talk) 11:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I am LuckyGuy17. I would like to start editing pages on Wikipedia. I have edited in my own Sandbox. Most pages are protected so that only "template editors" and "administrators" can edit. How can I edit these pages? Every page (with an exception of my sandbox and talk pages) I try to edit is locked.

Hello! Most boring pages are open to editing by anybody. If a page is locked, there's typically a reason for it, for instance some political controversy leading to aggressive back-and-forth editing, or the danger that an ill-conceived edit could lead to widespread disruption, as in the case of widely used templates. In these cases, you can propose your edit on the associated Talk page. If someone with the appropriate rights agrees with the edit, they will carry it out. AxelBoldt (talk) 23:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Axel, I like this cryptomoney logo, doesn't you ?

	The Writer's Barnstar
	To the amazing author who started the wikimoney. Copyleft (talk) 12:00, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyleft (talk) 10:56, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not a fan of cryptocurrencies, in general. AxelBoldt (talk) 14:57, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Real Life Barnstar
	Thanks a lot for your time and contributions! Aravindvenma (talk) 17:17, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI, I nominated some old redirects - like Year in Review 5th Century BC - for discussion here. Notifying you since you're the one who converted the pages to redirects. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:58, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Axel,

ich hoffe, ich gerate hier an jemanden, der die Richtlinien des WP:COMMONNAME durchsetzen kann, ich weiß nicht mehr weiter, der Kern der Diskussion, wann und wo denn bewiesen wurde, dass Nur-Sultan im Englischen benutzt wird (der neue Name der Stadt seit 2 Jahren, benannt nach dem undemokratischen Diktator Nursultan Nazarbajev) wurde schlichtweg nicht beantwortet /die Diskussion abgebrochen.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Move_review/Log/2021_November

Das ist der Link zu der Diskussion beim „Move review“ und natürlich der auf der Diskussionsseite von Nur-Sultan.

Es wurde nie bewiesen und war auch nachweislich nie richtig, dass die Stadt Astana im Englischen Nur-Sultan genannt wurde.

Dass es auch immer noch nicht der Fall ist, haben User:Toddy1 und ich bewiesen, wie sichtbar hier:

As it is written, the numbers stem from searching Nur Sultan with and without the hyphen, but still, if taken together,the numbers for Nur-Sultan and Nur Sultan (hopefully not including the namegiving Kazakhian politician, this has to be checked as well) the results in 2021 for Nur-Sultan alone remain more than 10 percent or more than 700 entries lower than for Astana only, in 2020 it was over 2000 more entries / 20 % higher.

Aus irgendeinem mir nicht ersichtlichen Grund, richten sich aber einige Aktivisten hier auf Wikipedia wohlwissentlich nicht an die eigenen Richtlinien, vermutlich aus politischen Gründen.

Bitte hilf mit, Wikipedias Richtlinien beizubehalten und nicht die Entscheidungen politischen Aktivisten (pro eines Diktators) zu überlassen.

--Tecumseh*1301 (talk) 10:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, da möchte ich mich nicht einmischen. AxelBoldt (talk) 16:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Dear AxelBoldt,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more. ​

Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weaveravel (talk • contribs) 11:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tarski's undefinability theorem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diagonal argument.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A token of thanks Hi AxelBoldt! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Syria chemical weapons program, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joint Intelligence Committee.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Purely transcendental and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 10#Purely transcendental until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 10:46, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Astronomy has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, AxelBoldt, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Notrealname1234 (talk) 22:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Levi-Civita field, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dictionary order.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:10, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello @AxelBoldt: could you help to check my draft articles. Draft:Said Ahmad Draft:Edvard Rtveladze Xabibulla Muxamedov (talk) 10:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no. AxelBoldt (talk) 18:12, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maximilian Kolbe has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 21:02, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thumbnail gallery post is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thumbnail gallery post (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

बिनोद थारू (talk) 00:52, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:36, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pink TV (American TV channel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unref article on non-notable topic, in CAT:NN for 14 years. No good WP:ATD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 16:42, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and Hello @Boleyn

Redirected (good ATD). Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 18:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vector space has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 03:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alan Lorber has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This articles is a stub and orphan and has been the subject of copyright violations and tons of promotional content over the years It's been cut down many times to a single sentence and don't see what it's adding to the project.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jason Itzler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Majority of page sourced from one article. Alleged recent "attention online" is sourced from now deleted YouTube video.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Xv (software) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSOFT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

The article Statcoulomb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources so evidently not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Johnjbarton (talk) 15:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]