Hello, Australianblackbelt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 16:20, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Australianblackbelt! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anthony Arnett and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carmen Ibis Novoa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RadioFan (talk) 04:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carmen Ibis Novoa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Robert Downey Jr., did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 11:31, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Downey Jr.. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Regardless of relevance or whether it's been sourced properly or not, this doesn't look like information that belongs on an encyclopaedia. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 13:03, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

I'm not sure what you mean by using "Journalist" and "Editor' as titles of references. The title is supposed to be the title of the article. I should also mention that local news sources are not considered strong for determining notability, so you might limit your use of those. That her books are held in the national library is of not consequence (national libraries keep all books published in the country), so remove that. You must have cites for any literary awards. Do not list all of her works, only select ones, usually those that have been reviewed, with the reviews as references. Unreviewed works do not confer notability, and cannot be confirmed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carmen Ibis Novoa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 20:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Carmen Novoa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

333-blue 04:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mrs Globe Classic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donna Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mrs Globe Classic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mrs Globe Classic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 11:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Terry lim has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 12:04, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Terry lim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kolbasz (talk) 13:17, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Terry Lim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 16:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Terry Lim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Lim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 13:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A documentary has been made about Terry Lim and show in the melbourne international film festival http://miff.com.au/festival-archive/film/24574/its-him-terry-lim All that is written in this article is sourced for an Australin National newspaper http://sifu.maurice.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Jpeg-LAT.jpg + http://sifu.maurice.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/LAT-p2-561x1024.jpg

Please explain the reason behind this deletion request (Australianblackbelt (talk) 06:49, 20 June 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Robert Downey Jr., did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 08:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Downey Jr.. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 14:14, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to List of beauty pageants appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 11:50, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, cheers (Australianblackbelt (talk) 03:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Mrs Globe Australia 2016. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Talk to me I apreciate that advise I will do as you suggested Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing) (Australianblackbelt (talk}) 17:21, 17 November 2016 (UTC))[reply]

The article Mrs Globe Australia 2016 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Failed to meet WP:GNG. The article has not received SIGNIFICANT coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 03:27, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Richie Campbell I see your the person who has been deleting the Mrs Globe and the Mrs Australia from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_beauty_pageants and also deleted the dite form Australia to Australiasia which now remains becuase it is correct. This article is based on the story in The Latin Australian Times (National print edition 29 page 14). © 2015-2016 Latin Australian Times. A feature story with three photos in full process color. Its parent article her https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mrs_globe_australia (Australianblackbelt (talk) 10:27, 19 November 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Articles that does not meet WP:GNG will be deleted.--Richie Campbell (talk) 21:10, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Australianblackbelt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mrs Globe Australia 2016 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mrs Globe Australia 2016 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richie Campbell (talk) 14:35, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest to use User:Gryllida/sandbox/1 to practice sources finding. Just my personal recommendation - not a part of the article creation process. Then give your sources list to a friend and ask to write down summary and author info for each source. Compare what you've got. You can use User:Gryllida/sandbox/2, User:Gryllida/sandbox/3, etc if you're doing this together with friends.

You can edit visually on these pages so even technically uninvolved editors may help you with an independent sources summarization process and then you start comparing the results together. --Gryllida 03:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I helped you with the sources on Miss América Latina in IRC. Just wanted to catch up on one comment you made. In regards to the statement "I dont think its a good idea letting this sit for a whole year with one minor source", you've sort of missed my point. I was finding you sources that were perfect for the article. Attempting to delete the article instead of editing it because it would "take ages" is a ridiculous thing to say. I will add those sources to the page and contest the deletion. Thanks! Acalycine (talk) 06:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So you take one sentence from a looong conversation on IRC and make it out to be ridiculous... You are taking that out of context, how do these beauty pageant articles which I created from scratch look to you? Miss Latina Australia Miss Latina Australia 2016 Mrs Globe Australia Mrs Globe These Beauty pageant pages have every work backed up by sources. This article with no sources is to use your word Ridiculous Miss América Latina but if you want to go find sources to back up everything written on it be my guest... I would have waited for the various Hispanic Australian news sources to become available online so I can write it in the standard that should be wikipedia. (Australianblackbelt (talk) 14:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC))[reply]

An editor have removed the {{prod}} tag from Miss América Latina, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Acalycine (talk) 07:21, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So it took 4 editors to correct the page well for starters I would have NEVER have been able to fix it period until the sources became available... te felisito por lo que has echo ahoura la pagina me parece muy bien . (Australianblackbelt (talk) 15:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Hey Australianblackbelt. You may want to take a few minutes and read over Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images. In particular, in most circumstances, images should be left at their default size, and in nearly all circumstances, "px" should not be used to resize them, and an upright scaling factor should be used instead.

We have to keep in mind that Wikipedia is viewed using lots of different software, on lots of different devices, with lots of different setting, on lots of different resolutions. And so although a certain size may look just right on your personal monitor, it probably looks completely wonky on someone else's. And anyway, someone who's super interested in the image can always click through to see it in all its high resolution glory. TimothyJosephWood 16:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the tip I realise that after the last edit to Ms Australia Globe. (Australianblackbelt (talk) 16:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Hello, Australianblackbelt. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Anthony Arnett".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:16, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanking you sir/madamJMHamo (Australianblackbelt (talk) 07:05, 22 July 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Your article Uruguayan Social Club has been deleted because 10 mintues after creation it still contained no content other than a rephrasing of the title. It should be clear that you're having trouble making articles that stick around -- I strongly suggest that you work on articles in your sandbox, draft space, or AfC before moving them to the main article space.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:23, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am making it in Sandbox now, this seems strange(Australianblackbelt (talk) 23:35, 26 August 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for creating Tobago Jazz Festival, Australianblackbelt!

Wikipedia editor Aguyintobooks just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The Plymouth Jazz Festival which is in its fifth year was last year voted the "third Biggest Event on Planet Earth" by American magazine Forbes 500. I presume it is also called the Plymouth jazz festival? this fact could be added, along with where in Tobago it takes place (obviously in Plymouth).

To reply, leave a comment on Aguyintobooks's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) -  14:40, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Terry Lim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 05:05, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Australianblackbelt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Anthony Arnett, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Australianblackbelt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anthony Arnett".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Terry Lim, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Australianblackbelt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Australianblackbelt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Felix Leong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Advertiser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problem fixed thank you! Australianblackbelt (talk) 12:41, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 09:11, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since you seem to have stopped reverting everyone everywhere long enough for me to finish writing this out:

1. Deletion review (DRV) isn't the place for this. That's a venue for reviewing whether a deletion discussion was closed correctly, or a speedy deletion was done incorrectly. "Subject isn't notable" is an AFD argument, and would be ignored at DRV.
2. Even if you wanted the previous AFD reviewed, DRV wouldn't do it. AFDs don't expire, exactly, but DRV categorically refuses to review discussions as old as that one, instead asking for a new AFD (if the article currently exists) or new article (if it doesn't).
3. And even if DRV would entertain this request, you placed it on a closed log page, where it won't be seen by anyone except a few people like me who have every log page watchlisted. If you go to WP:DRV, you'll see that 2020 January 13 isn't even listed, because no drvs were initiated on that day.
4. And the article isn't eligible for WP:Proposed deletion either, since it was previously kept at AFD.

User:Finngall was exactly right in his first revert - the place to discuss this is at a new Articles for Deletion discussion, and the way to properly list it there is at WP:AFDHOWTO. To be fair, that's become an unconscionably bloated mess since the last time I looked at it; the part you specifically want is the line If this article has been nominated before, use {{subst:afdx|2nd}} or {{subst:afdx|3rd}} etc. next to the gaudy yellow "I". —Cryptic 02:09, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you for taking the time to explain Cryptic I will try as you say Australianblackbelt (talk) 03:11, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Australianblackbelt, please see Wikipedia:Wikidata --Glorious Engine (talk) 23:52, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wing Chun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shaolin. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion was closed before I had a chance to respond to your question. No, I don't consider a website where anyone can post to be considered a reliable source. I thought my statement "A brief bio page on another website that anyone can post to also does meet the standard of an independent and reliable source" was quite clear, though apparently it wasn't. Papaursa (talk) 23:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Papaursa: Thank you, I think you meant to say; can post to does NOT meet the standard... Cheers, Australianblackbelt (talk) 23:47, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. I read that twice and still missed my error. I think I originally wrote the first two sentences of that post as one sentence with a "nor" in between, but then I decided to make it two sentences and got rid of the nor. A bit of careless editing that. At least it didn't impact the discussion's result. Papaursa (talk) 23:54, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Yuen Kay Shan into The Legend Is Born: Ip Man. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:02, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't really understand what you mean but I did write the content and reference in both the pages. Australianblackbelt (talk) 14:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Letter of praise from Jacksonville Jaguars to Anthony Arnett, July 2005.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 07:38, 1 January 2021 (UTC) Wikiacc (¶) 07:38, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AMAA Who’s who in martial arts award plaque, 2018.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 05:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC) Wikiacc (¶) 05:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to James DeMile has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 17:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: That is completely wrong I changed words and sentences it is not copied just compare them, I've written over a dozan articles I know how to use my own words. Australianblackbelt (talk) 18:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not identical but it's far too similar. We can't keep it, so sorry.— Diannaa (talk) 18:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: And you think I can re write it?? I re-wrote the whole James DeMile article, why don't you take a look at the over a dozen articles I've written. Australianblackbelt (talk) 18:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: and you removed the links to FBI, secrete service, those were accomplishments and with a credible source why would you do that? Australianblackbelt (talk) 18:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of times it's difficult to re-write content. If you can't figure out a way to re-word something, please don't add it. Alphabetical lists are ok; names of organizations do not need to be re-worded. But your addition was almost identical to the source, so I removed all the matching content. — Diannaa (talk) 18:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Press releases are not very good sources. — Diannaa (talk) 18:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: that's so patronizing I've written like 20 articles from scratch you recon I cant re write some content Australianblackbelt (talk) 18:42, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: You think Virgin Australia are going to lie about what what Demile's experience in training government law enforcement and contract him to develop their plan? They would face a law suite, so in this case the source is better than any news paper Australianblackbelt (talk)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising.   — Jeff G. ツ 06:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at Maurice Novoa. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 06:50, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry you are too late I have already created these articles which were based on national news sources the subject has generated Sum Nung, Pan Nam, Felix Leong, Terry Lim, Anthony Arnett, Yuen Chai Wan, Tran Thuc Tien, Eric Oram, Mrs Globe, Mrs Globe Australia, Miss Latina Australia, Miss Asia Pacific International 2017, Adau Mornyang, AMAA Who's Who in the Martial Arts Hall of Fame, Australasian Martial Arts Hall of Fame. There will be many more articles on the famouse Latin-Australian to come but but I dont mind if it is now your goal to have this paged deleted I used to be a student of Maurice Novoa he doesnt care about this page. Good luck in the future and keep up the great work Australianblackbelt (talk)

The file File:AMAAI Foundation Logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free logo whose use in AMAA Who's Who in the Martial Arts Hall of Fame fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#3a. While non-free logos of an organization are typically allowed when they are used for primary identification purposes at the top of or in the main infobox of stand-alone article about the organization they represent, those logo (despite what the rationale claims) isn't being used in such a manner. The article is about an award given out by the American Martial Arts Alliance Foundation, not the foundation itself, and there is already an image being used for that award (File:AMAA Who’s who in martial arts award plaque, 2018.jpg) being used in the main infobox of the article for identification purposes. If the AMMA meets WP:NORG and a stand-alone article is created about it, then it would be fine to use its in that article; however, trying to WP:COATRACK and article about the organization into the article about the award not only has problems for encyclopedic reasons, but it also basically fails to meet the WP:NFCCP with respect to the this file's non-free use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: This article contains a logo Bruce Lee and the logo in question has Contextual significance. Australianblackbelt (talk) 10:41, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's no discussion of this "Bruce Lee logo" anywhere in the article, and there is already a "logo" of the award being used for primary identification purposes in the main infobox. If the organization's logo is something that has received critically commentary in reliable secondary sources, you add content specific to the logo to the article and clarify this in its non-free use rationale, then that might better establish its contextual significance. Otherwise, it seems pretty much a WP:DECORATIVE type of non-free use that's generally not allowed. Anyway, if you disagree, you can always WP:DEPROD the file; given its current non-free use, however, I don't think it would be pretty hard to establish a consensus at WP:FFD that the file's non-free use is WP:NFCC compliant. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:55, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've WP:DEPRODed myself since the file is now being used for primary identification purposes in a stand-alone article about the foundation. This, however, is unrelated to whether the foundation meets WP:NORG, but that has nothing to do with WP:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:47, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Australianblackbelt. Is AMAA Who's Who in the Martial Arts Hall of Fame about an award or an organization? It's not clear whether either of the two is Wikipedia notable enough to justify a stand-alone article, but it seems as if you're trying to make one article cover both subjects. Generally, such a thing can be seen as kind of WP:COATRACKING and such a thing is not really a good idea. It would seem that if only one of the two is notable, then it would be the AMAA itself with content about its HOF contained within it: however, it's not clear whether that it would meet WP:NORG. Anyway, if you feel both are notable, it would be better to create an article about each and focus on content specific to each; in other words, content related specifically to the award in the award's article and other more general content (e.g. its publications, board and activities) related to the organization in the organization's article. I'm also curious about the content you added for the |focus= parameter in the infobox you added here. You originally used the word "our" as in "for our 2021 Martial Arts Build Back Project programs". Do you have any connection to the AMAA or was there some other reason why you used "our" in that way? -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:44, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have no connection I am in Australia and have nothing to do with them, I have written dozens of articles for martial artists all over the world. If they were two articles somebody would nominate to merge them together Australianblackbelt (talk) 10:50, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly:The reason they are together is because there are other organizations names American martial arts alliance and the name of the award is not the same as the foundation that created it. hence it is less confusing to people when they see the article as it is presented.Australianblackbelt (talk) 10:53, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: See now this article which I created is straight forward because the award is the same name as the organization Australasian Martial Arts Hall of Fame. Australianblackbelt (talk) 10:56, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the case, then it would seem to better to create an article about the organization and then add content about the award to it instead of doing it the other way around. If there are other organizations with the same name that have Wikipedia articles written about them, you can always disambiguate the title; however, there doesn't seem to be any article titled American Martial Arts Alliance Foundation so there might not be any need for disambiguation at all. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:00, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: It's done American Martial Arts Alliance now they are two separate articles. Australianblackbelt (talk) 11:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to add some relevant WikiProject banners to the article talk page. Template:WikiProject Martial arts and Template:WikiProject Organizations are two that come to mind. This will help let others know about the articles and add it to category pages of articles needing assessment. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:54, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This file fails WP:NFCC#8 pretty much for the same reasons as given above in #Proposed deletion of File:AMAAI Foundation Logo.png. If you're the copyright holder of the logo and want to give your WP:CONSENT and release under a free license that Wikipedia accepts, than you can do that (though the provenance of the photo in the center of the logo isn't clear]]). At the same time, if you think the "Melbourne Sport & Street Wing Chun Kung Fu" is notable enough per WP:NORG for a stand-alone article to be written about it that would survive a WP:AFD discussion, then a non-free file would be OK there. I don't think there's any way, however, to justify this per Wikipedia's non-free content use policy in the Novoa article as it's currently being used. I give you some time to try and sort this out or seek other feedback at either WP:MCQ or WT:NFCC, but this will nominated for discussion at WP:FFD if it's not resolved sometime soon. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: No it's fine I'll remove it so far I've done everything you have suggested from the start and look what the result is a Global ban for me, funny how you said OTRS volunteers like Jeff sing confidentiality agreements so I can as you say Keep my secrete identity safe the OTRS guys have jumped to the conclusion that I am Novoa but I'm just a pensioner with no vested interest. Seem like I played right in to your hand, well done. Australianblackbelt (talk) 14:58, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: This is a clever way to prove I am Novoa if I had the copyright to his logo and tried to release it however I am not so I can't. I could be wrong about your entrapment attempt, feel free to select an image of the subject for the info box there are many in commons. I sure as hell am never going to touch the Maurice Novoa article ever again! Australianblackbelt (talk)

I had no idea the Novoa article existed until this post was added to your user talk page. My post about the logo was simply to try and help you avoid it from being deleted from Wikipedia. The same thing goes for my posts on your Commons use talk page; they were only intended to try and help you resolve the issues you seem to be having with OTRS and your Commons uploads. I don't know who emailed OTRS or what information those emails contained; so, I don't know how that information affects you here on Wikipedia. I did ask you early on if you had a connection to the AMAA, but you stated you didn't and I haven't asked you about it since then. Just for reference, Wikipedia doesn't expressly prohibit conflict of interest editing, but it does highly discourage it because COI editors often have a hard time editing in accordance with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Having a COI doesn't automatically make an editor a bad editor and those that follow Wikipedia's policies and guidelines on COI editing often avoid problems. Only you truly know who you are and whether you have a connection with any of the Wikipedia articles you've been editing or creating. If you do have such a connection, the more transparent you are about it the better because it will make it easier for others to help you and it will also make others less suspicious of your reasons for editing. There was no attempt on my part to try and entrap you into revealing who you are; how much you want others on Wikipedia to know about you is up to you. At the same time, if other editors feel that you might not be totally forthcoming about the relationship that you might with some of the subjects that you're editing about, then they can try and seek clarification. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Maurice Novoa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Autobiography that has insufficient verifiable references from reliable sources to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.   — Jeff G. ツ 13:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Australianblackbelt. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Maurice Novoa, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 14:26, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: Kindly answer this question OTRS Super sluth; If this article is just a self promotion why then was it not created half a decade ago in 2016? Nominating an article for deletion with national and two international print edition news sources, that's one heck of a personal grudge. My work is pure voluntary and I am a pentioner. Australianblackbelt (talk) 14:46, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been WP:DEPRODed by another editor which means that if it will need to be discussed at WP:AFD if someone still feels it still needs to be deleted. For reference, articles being prodded for deletion is not all that unusual. There are over six million articles and its not possible for them to all be reviewed or assessed in a timely matter; so, how long an article has existed is not really too relevant when it comes to deletion discussions. All Wikipedia editors are WP:VOLUNTEERs and most of those who've been editing for a long time are doing so because they want to be WP:HERE. Most of the time when an editor nominates or tags an article deletion it's not because of some personal grudge, but rather because they feel the content simply isn't suited for Wikipedia as explained in Wikipedia:So your article has been nominated for deletion. The way to try and resolve such things is to figure out what the concerns are and if or how they can be resolved. All editors get frustrated at times, but when that happens it's best to try and remain WP:COOL and try to resolve things through civil discussion; sometimes that can be hard to do, but it's often the only way of keeping things from getting worse. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well I've created a heap of articles over the years so I know all about weasel words and peacock issues, when they get reviewed they don't go easy on me so I know there is no problem with this article and if I wasn't just a volunteer I would go to the national library archives and dig up a bunch more articles from older spainsh news papers like noticias y deportes about Novoa, trust me there are plenty. English media dont bother covering people's achievements in Australia they didnt even cover the Mrs Globe Australia 25th anniversary pageant at federation square, not a sigle article except in LAT. Australianblackbelt (talk) 06:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Melbourne Sport and Street Wing Chun Kung Fu Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Arnett sport kung fu logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Australian Grand Prix § Photo question. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See also Talk:Security guard/Archives/2021#Maurice Novoa photos. Perhaps you can clarify your reasons for adding this photo to the "Australian Grand Prix" article as well as adding it and one other to the "Security Guard" article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That was published in LAT the grand prix photo Australianblackbelt (talk)

It is is easier for news papers to publish photos when they are in wikicommons, that's the whole point of uploading the photos to commons and having the photographer sent an OTRS. most of the photos uploaded have ended up in news papers and will continue to do so. Australianblackbelt (talk) 07:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that's a entirely correct understanding of either Commons or OTRS. The primary point of Commons is given in c:COM:SCOPE and files uploaded to it are expected to have some realistic educational value. Newspapers, etc. may freely use files uploaded to Commons if they want as long as they comply with the licensing terms of the files they use; however, Commons isn't really for uploading personal photos, etc. just so that they can perhaps be used by some newspaper or website some day. Most countries have fair use or fair dealing provisions in their respective copyright laws which would allow such content to be used without it being uploaded to Commons and the copyirght holder can simply give the newspaper, etc. permission to use their photos if they want without even involving Commons. There are also image hosting websites like Flickr, etc. where such files can be uploaded, and released under whatever license the copyright wants. Finally, even though Commons and Wikipedia are sister projects, they are still separate projects with their own policies and guidelines. Wikipedia's policy regarding image use is Wikipedia:Image use policy, and while most images found used in Wikipedia articles do come from Commons, not every image uploaded to Commmons should be used in Wikipedia articles. Per WP:IUP#Adding images to articles, there typically needs to be a strong contextual connection between image and article content so that the reader's understanding of said content is actually improved in some way by seeing the image. In other words, adding an image should make an article better in some way for the general reader of the article; it shouldn't just be to make things better for the subject of the article or for the subject of the image. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok fair enough I was wrong, nobody tuaght me how to write over a dozen wikipedia pages It was a huge struggle and your the first to explain things in depth, thank you for that. Australianblackbelt (talk) 11:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: I understand now so this image is obviously educational https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8b/Ondino_Vieira_1967.jpg Australianblackbelt (talk) 12:26, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are getting this copyright warning as you appear to have just lifted the description for Cewekku Jutek directly from IMDb. This is a copyright violation and is not allowed on Wikipedia. Additionally you are linking to copyright violations hosted on people's websites of news stories that are being hosted there without permission from the copyright holders, which again is against Wikipedia's copyright rules.

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Canterbury Tail talk 13:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maurice Novoa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maurice Novoa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Canterbury Tail talk 13:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC) Please delete before the article comes out this week or it might get used aS AT SOURCE THE uRUGUAYAN COMMUNTY DOES NOT WANT mAURICE nOVOA ON WIKIPEDIA WIKI PEDASIA BRINGS SHAME OM THE uRUGUAYN COUNTRIES NAME Australianblackbelt (talk) 05:28, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's an article coming out next week? And how would you know such a thing? Canterbury Tail talk 13:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely I saw on Maurice Novoa Facebook page his club is no longer accepting students which means he’s done for good, awesome job bros Australianblackbelt (talk) 06:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC) Australianblackbelt (talk) 06:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Uruguayan Social Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely non-notable organization. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Canterbury Tail talk 12:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I made it it in only FAMOUSE to one country URUGUAY. delete srteaight away as ait should lead to deletion of Maurcie Novoa's page alothough there is a major article comeing out on EL Espaniol this week. DO me a fouver brother Get MAURICE NOVOA deleted streigha away he does not like the attention. Australianblackbelt (talk) 05:26, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This comment is simply unacceptable. Suggesting that other editors should kill people just because they believe your article is not notable is not an acceptable or collaborative comment. I suggest that you remove it. Canterbury Tail talk 12:59, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Loeng's Wing Chun.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Loong Fu Pai logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 14:10, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may as well just give up with the Felix Leong thing, man. Those articles you keep conflict-of-interest editing are being watched constantly now because of your silly campaign, and you ought to just think yourself lucky Felix Leong's own article isn't being deleted, since there's literally NOTHING indicating him to be notable aside from those local community newsletter things you keep on citing despite being told they're not good enough. Now just count your blessings and stop the shoehorning game, it's just going to be reverted every single time you try it, never giving citations from decent sources. Seriously, to include Felix Leong alongside Ip Man, Bruce Lee and Donnie Yen on the Wing Chun article as a notable practitioner is simply hilarious! You... do KNOW your editing history is publicly visible, right? And that your nonsense has drawn people's attention? Good luck! :)

What have you got against Felix you don’t remove the links in red Australianblackbelt (talk) 04:41, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RPSkokie were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alchemy (blockchain company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alchemy (blockchain company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 06:19, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.

You have been warned before about adding links to scans and photos of copyrighted material being hosting without the copyright holders permission, but you're are still re-adding them. Links to scans of newspapers stored on someone's private web server do not contain the copyright attributions and permissions to show they are being stored there with permission of the copyright holder. Per WP:COPYLINK you cannot link to these. You have been warned about this before, but you still persist in this. Stop!

Note, please read

Now, that being said, for a reference you don't need to provide a link to a scanned copy of it. If you truly believe that the LAT is a reliable source, you can just add the LAT as a reference. You do not need to add a URL link to a scan to back it up. The reference material does not actually have to be readily available to all readers immediately. So for a newspaper you can add a reference to the newspaper article, issue date, page etc, but you don't need to add a URL link. See WP:HOWCITE. From a copyright perspective it's the link to a non-permission copy of the articles that are tripping you up, not the reference itself. I hope you understand the difference. Canterbury Tail talk 11:42, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense, I don't want to rip your head off no more! But what about a scan on the Journalist's Facebook page? Australianblackbelt (talk) 19:57, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly, they'd at least have rights to it. Canterbury Tail talk 13:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of history and knowledge has made proposal of deletion not worthy of the facts 2601:647:C980:A220:9036:AB0E:370B:D44B (talk) 17:49, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mrs. Globe, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mrs. Globe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mrs Globe Australia, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mrs Globe Australia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Sera, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Sera until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Abishe that means a lot 😊 Australianblackbelt (talk) 21:04, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 20:57, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Downey Jr.. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 06:55, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The info box is constructive in one day viewers have opened it and clicked on Eric Oram's page his stats show a jump from 50 views in a day to 118 just cause of the box. The are over a dozen quality references stating Downey trains Wing Chun he even went on Oprah to discuss it and show where he trains and with who. The photo in the info box show three notable persons so it is relevant. I dont understand what your problem is cause the info box is small and collapsible doesn't take up space. Australianblackbelt (talk) 07:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Kung Fu (Ranking) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your fourth warning. — Diannaa (talk) 15:07, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I had changed the words of the original contract Australianblackbelt (talk) 15:15, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kung Fu (Ranking), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Belt.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Daniel (talk) 21:57, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why cant I see it? Thanks Australianblackbelt (talk) 22:06, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:ANI#Personal attack - Australianblackbelt.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:12, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have met Maurice Novoa whom I have written about at the Uruguyan social club of Melbourne Australianblackbelt (talk) 02:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cabayi (talk) 10:55, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Kung Fu (Ranking), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:00, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AMAA Who's Who in the Martial Arts Hall of Fame is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMAA Who's Who in the Martial Arts Hall of Fame until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mountaincirque^talk 11:25, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AMAA Who’s who in martial arts award plaque, 2018.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Australianblackbelt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kung Fu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 15:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mrs. Globe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mrs. Globe (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]