Good afternoon. As a new user registering an account in the past hour it's great to see you already up to speed and versed in things like edit summaries etc, so I'll spare you the usual Welcome advice I'd otherwise hand to newbies here. I have a question however... This edit, which wrapped up with the edit summary of Relevancy, election result, also removed a reliable third party reference to events that occurred during that very election you edited about. A negative, reliable third party reference I might add. What's up there? You first... in the interests of assuming good faith from fellow editors... -- Longhair\^talk 04:38, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

The source in question does not relate to Mr Wilson's actions, candidature, his staff or his personal campaign, but rather the campaign of his running mate. Such information is better placed on a non-partisan page dedicated to that specific election. In search of factual information about Mr Wilson I found this confusing at best, a dishonest conflation at worst. Auspolly (talk) 04:56, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]