Hi Aswins29! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Hello, I'm Jay8g. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kwang Sheng have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. :Jay8g [V•T•E] 04:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks for the information Aswins29 (talk) 06:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added was copied from another website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. Diannaa (talk) 15:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Center for Climate Research Society and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:24, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aswins29! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:24, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page Draft:Center for Climate Research Society has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

• It seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:25, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aswins29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I respectfully request a review of the block placed on my account, as I believe it is a misunderstanding.

I have been informed that my account has been blocked for being a sockpuppet. However, I can assure you that I have always adhered to Wikipedia's policies and have never used multiple accounts to deceive, evade blocks, or disrupt the community.

If this block is based on technical evidence such as shared IP addresses, I would like to clarify that I often contribute from a oublic network, which may have inadvertently linked my account to others.

I am committed to maintaining Wikipedia's integrity and contributing constructively. If any of my actions have caused concern, I would appreciate guidance to avoid such issues in the future.

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. Only one open request is needed at a time. 331dot (talk) 09:15, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Your unblock request appears to have been generated by a chatbot.--Diannaa (talk) 05:19, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aswins29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I was recently informed that my account was blocked due to suspicions of being a sockpuppet. I want to clarify that I have not created multiple accounts with the intention to deceive or violate Wikipedia’s policies.

If the block is due to shared IP addresses or similar editing patterns, I’d like to explain that I sometimes edit from the public library near to my house, which could have caused confusion or mistakenly linked my account with others.

I value the community and have always aimed to contribute positively. If any of my edits or actions raised concerns, I would appreciate guidance on how I can improve and ensure that I comply with Wikipedia's guidelines.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I would be happy to provide any further information you might need. Aswins29 (talk) 06:03, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 09:15, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sukeshms was registered a week or so ago, and tried at least ten times to create an article, under every imaginable title, on the Centre for Climate Research and Rural Development (CCRRD). They got blocked a few days ago for spamming.

That same day, Sukeshms12 was registered, and created a draft on the same subject. They were blocked.

Then Ajithmathews was registered, created another draft on the same, and got also blocked.

And then your account was registered, and as one of your first edits you created yet another draft on this same subject, under yet another title. We never heard of the CCRRD until a few days ago. Then the same user tries to create an article, using three different accounts... but you're saying the fourth account involved (ie. yours) is not at all connected to the previous three; it's purely coincidental? Really? --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aswins29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear DoubleGrazing

I appreciate your concerns. I am aware of the significant work done by the Centre for Climate Resources and Rural Development (CCRRD) in mitigating climate change and supporting rural communities. Publishing an article about CCRRD on Wikipedia could disseminate information about them to public. Moreover it is a registered society involved in several meaningful projects.

I am committed to following Wikipedia’s guidelines and providing reliable sources to establish the organization’s notability. I would be grateful for any guidance on how to proceed appropriately.

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool confirms that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 17:12, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You only need one open request at a time, additional comments should be made as standard, unformatted comments like this. 331dot (talk) 09:15, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You did not answer the question. Are you asking us to believe that you and others on the same public Internet access point coincidentally decided to repeatedly attempt to edit about the CCRRD? If you are connected to the CCRRD, now is the time to say so. 331dot (talk) 09:17, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aswins29 (talk) 17:42, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]