Archives

1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323 Online events: New: Asian women | Geofocus: Islands Q-Z | Women in engineering Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Annual Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) is an online campaign designed to boost Asian content on Wikipedia each November. Unreferenced articles backlog drive. These Wikiproject clean-up lists offer a start to November's backlog drive, e.g. Women's History and Women writers Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed images at search.creativecommons.org/ Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Willow Dawson, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:25, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325 Online events: New: Women who died in 2024 | Religion Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Women in Religion have a monthly virtual edit-a-thon and the next session is December 2nd 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. CST. For Zoom meeting details, contact Dzingle1 or RosPost. Women in Red members are welcome to join the Zoom Meeting here Tip of the month: Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:20, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--Bridget (talk) 22:42, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I noticed you recently requested a revision deletion (revdel) for copyright violation on the Trudy Coxe article. Typically, when you request a revdel, you should include the numbers for the revisions to be deleted. For copyright violations, you should remove the copyrighted material as soon as possible. However, you did not include any revision numbers, and you have not removed any content from the article. Additionally, the only information I'm seeing in the copyvios report is quotations, which do not count as copyright violations. Can you review the article and update your revdel request as needed? Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:57, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Significa liberdade. I see your edits so I've just gone ahead and removed the revdel tag on it. Best, Bridget (talk) 02:59, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good! Thanks. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bridget, I had included a secondary source for the above article. The primary source I added as the name (or variations of) came up in searches, although it wasn't really necessary. The second was an interview with an online publication about women in business. Knitsey (talk) 23:48, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Knitsey, thanks for reaching out. I wouldn't dispute if you restored the mention of the position. There's a bit of a concern that the secondary source, InformationWeek, is a trade publication, so I would be a bit suspect of whether it's independent or not and if the content it's used to support is worth a mention, per WP:DUE. Bridget (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair enough Bridget, leave it out for now. I think that unless there are more sources found for the books, it will get deleted. I try to pay attention to womens biographies but some are just not notable enough. Thanks for checking though. Knitsey (talk) 00:52, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]