For repairing vandalism to my user page. --John (talk) 19:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. AngelOfSadness talk 15:18, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like Troy Rodriguez is back with Troy Rodriguez (actor). You'd suggested previously that I mention this to you if I came across any others. Thanks! Rnb (talk) 15:13, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did and so the article is now deleted and salted like the others. AngelOfSadness talk 15:26, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just received my 1,000th contribution. I'm so excited!!! HairyPerry 17:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well done!! I remember being really excited when I reached 1,000 edits too which was over a year ago. Although I still wonder how some users manage to have over a hundred thousand edits and I'm not talking about bots here :). Anyway Congrats!! AngelOfSadness talk 18:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Troy_Rodriguez_(Actor). I think he might have gotten around the previous salting by capping "actor"? I'm not sure. Thanks again. Rnb (talk) 14:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted and salted once again. This time the re-creation protection is six months as will be all future re-creations. Cheers again for alerting me about it. :) AngelOfSadness talk 19:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:Cardigans~MFG~MusicVideostill.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

he is 35 it was on his bio —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.190.71.210 (talk) 23:29, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are many sources available which say he's 30. But anyway, do you have a verfiable source for it as I'm not sure which biography you are referring to. AngelOfSadness talk 23:32, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources including askmen.com and US Search birth records(the 3rd one is his father, and I guess he's the second one as it says they are based in Florida, New York and LA which Perez would mostly likely be considering his occupation) saying he was born in 1978 making him 30. AngelOfSadness talk 23:44, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the input on my contributions. Will endeavotr to post the material again - but more on keeping with Wikipedia's guidelines. Mcwebeditor (talk) 15:52, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good to hear. If you have any questions about Wikipedia guidelines and whatnot, don't hesitate to ask me. Keep up the good work. AngelOfSadness talk 19:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "22:29, 5 December 2008 AngelOfSadness (Talk | contribs) m (17,374 bytes) (Added {{npov}} tag to article. using Friendly)" ... with the changes and the deletions that you and others have made to the page, is it now possible to remove the npov tag? Thanks, Mcwebeditor (talk) 21:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the remaining content that was clearly violating WP:NPOV like the "we allow you..." etc. stuff about the foundation as that seemed like blantant advertising. I also removed the phone numbers and addresses as Wikipedia is not a phone book. Only offical websites are allowed to be mentioned (in the external links section and the infobox of course) in articles and that's it for contact information. The tag has now been removed as all blantantly violating content has been removed along with it. AngelOfSadness talk 19:25, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, AngelOfSadness! Mcwebeditor (talk) 22:04, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo :) AngelOfSadness talk 22:05, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AngelOfSadness, did you know you've now been an administrator for six months? I think you've done well, and I hope you've had a good time. How have you been? Acalamari 21:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I can't believe it's been six months already and all I can say is so far so good. I've been good but haven't been able to be online that often because real life has been getting in the way and it's probably going to continue that way until July if I'm lucky :). Anyway how are you? AngelOfSadness talk 19:35, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it's been six months. :) I'm glad you've had a good time, but more importantly, I'm glad you've been having a good time in real life too. :) As for me, I am fine. :) Acalamari 21:19, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HEY ITS ME CAN YOU TALK TO ME SOMEMORE CAUSE IM BORED YEAH SO IF YOU COULD PLEASE THANKS --CPARKER (talk) 20:38, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I probably won't be able to talk to you very often for the next few months (real life is lessening the time I have on-line so...). If you're bored, you could try article writing (like find a stub, research the stub's topic and then add to the stub with your found research) or if you're not a writer you could beome a vandal patroller and revert vandal edits, warn the vandals and then report them to WP:AIV (after they received a last warning) but it'll mean reading through Wikipedia:Vandalism first to understand what would count as vandalism. AngelOfSadness talk 19:35, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your on my friends list on my user page could you go sign your name that would be a whole lot better, when you have a chance that is. HairyPerry 16:41, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Good to know I have another Wiki-friend :) AngelOfSadness talk 17:24, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. HairyPerry 17:40, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]