Leave me a message here. New messages go underneath old ones. Please sign your posts with ~~~~ Also, any angry, uncivil, or trolling comments/personal attacks left here will only add to the talkpage vandalism counter.

This user's page has been vandalized 213 times.

Archives

July 2007 - August 2007 September 2007 - October 2007 November 2007 - December 2007 January 2008 - February 2008 March 2008 - April 2008 May 2008 - June 2008 July 2008 - August 2008 September 2008 - October 2008 November 2008 - December 2008 January 2009 - May 2009 June 2009 - September 2013

Well, that didn't take long, did it? :D Heh, heh; always good to see you around here. :) Acalamari 20:21, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, guess I've to get used to that sort of thing again. :p AngelOfSadness talk 20:24, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping me clean up after myself after moving pages from my userspace! Derekbridges (talk) 20:40, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. :) AngelOfSadness talk 20:41, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The page I was working on, has deleted so fast. didnt got time to do well. disappears in minutes and I'm trying to say none. Thank you so much, Angel Of Sandness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oneboz (talk • contribs) 11:41, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User:Oneboz. The article had been tagged for a sufficent amount of time before deletion. I would suggest you re-create the article in User:Oneboz/sandbox so you can edit it without it being tagged for deletion while you're working on it. I'd suggest you look at the notability guidelines for musician articles when writing the article in your sandbox, make sure it fulfills the critera so that it won't be tagged for deletion again once re-created in the mainspace. Hope this helps. AngelOfSadness talk 11:47, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please be a responsible encyclopedia. Your citations and references with respect to Mr "Tay Za" are not working (broken link). Besides the sources that you used are not reliable e.g. Irrawaddy. It is not a professional source. Please embrace fairness, if you want to post negative information about a person on the www, the least you could do is verify the contents of your sources are reliable and accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.248.112.166 (talk) 15:59, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you're right that particular source is broken, The others however are working fine and you removed them and their associated content with unsourced content that violates wikipedia's WP:NPOV so of course I reverted your edits as the majority of them simply removed content without a valid reason. I'll remove that broken source, but please don't remove more content that's perfectly sourced (links working). If you have better sources (indepentant, 3rd party sources), please add them to the article. AngelOfSadness talk 16:07, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Back at it with a new ipv6 address. See 2a00:c440:20:27e:1875:fb75:6f28:726b (talk ·  · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)). Cheers - DVdm (talk) 18:07, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked 24 hrs by Edgar181. - DVdm (talk) 18:37, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Dvdm. Sorry I only saw this now. I'm currently watching that article to catch/block any new IP address making the same nuisance edits. If you see any other obvious IP socks disrupting other articles that need to be blocked, please let me know and hopefully I'm around to block them in a timely manner. AngelOfSadness talk 20:35, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, will do. Thanks and cheers. - DVdm (talk) 08:13, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was reading over the edits by User:50.200.216.42 and a lot of the information about prohibition era in Atlantic City IMHO seems accurate and properly referenced. Ed Bader was the Mayor of Atlantic City for many years and Enoch Johnson which is the basis for the character Enoch "Nucky" Thompson on the HBO series Boardwalk Empire is a real person and was the treasurer of Atlantic County as well as a undersheriff and sheriff of Atlantic County. Can I ask why you reverted this? TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 18:33, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, TheGoofyGolfer. That IP address blanked/deleted the section (which is properly referenced and fairly accurate) completely without reason so I reverted it as it did not appear constructive whatsoever. AngelOfSadness talk 20:17, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User,

I just wonder what kind of information is used as promotional stuff on wikipedia. I just wrote information about our educational units and etc. We just want to update and improve our page on Wikipedia. Could you please give some guidance on this?

Best Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oyauslu (talk • contribs) 08:45, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oyauslu. Well, promotional text (such as "With its qualified and experienced staff, the faculty continues its studies to provide the students with the best educational opportunities.") is not allowed in Wikipedia articles per WP:NOTADVERTISING unless it was said by an independent third party source (no one connected to the university) which should be added to the article as a quote and a citation added to back up the statement. Any statements containing "our", anything that reads as a mission statement ("this course aims to"...) make the article read as an advertisment for the college not an encyclopedia entry for which is the standard Wikipedia aims. And unless you add independent third party sources to back-up the positive things about the university (e.g. the quality of education/courses), the text will be removed as it'll prevent the article from having a neutral point of view. Please take a look at the featured articles of Ohio Wesleyan University and Michigan State University so you can get a better idea on what is suitable for the Hitit University article. Also note how neither article contains lists upon lists of courses available in their universities: lists again read more like a promotional webpage rather than encyclopedia entry.

Also because you just admitted to being connected to the subject, you are highly discouraged from editing the article due to a conflict of interest as it may prevent the article from maintaining a neutral point of view. And so I would suggest that you write your suggestions to be made to the article on the article's talk page so an editor who is unconnected with the university can determine if it's suitable to be added to the article. I hope this helps. AngelOfSadness talk 12:23, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User,

Thank you for the feedback you provided me about the page of Hitit University on Wikipedia

Have a nice day — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oyauslu (talk • contribs) 14:19, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BustaRhymes - DangerousSingleCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:05, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AngelOfSadness! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:50, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 03:47, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For us have a special someone, a love is another secret affair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A03:2880:2130:CFF6:FACE:B00C:0:1 (talk) 08:59, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AngelOfSadness.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:16, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux ^Talk 17:47, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dearie, did you change your name for a reason? Sadness cannot be allowed to prevail, can it…? Ever so friendly, a user called Prüm (talk) 07:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC) (p.s. if you regard this as vandalism, please don't push the counter up, at least for somebody's sake…)[reply]

Thank you for your lovely and polite message. I feel very honoured and hope things will turn out well for you too. Regards and greetings from Germany, --Prüm (talk) 15:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:34, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TokioHotel - UbersEndeDerWelt - MaxiCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:My Favourite Game CD 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]