1. /Archive 1:Earliest discussion up to 14/5/06
2. /Archive 2:Discussion from 14/5/06 - 26/9/06
3. /Archive 3:Discussion from 26/9/06 - 16/3/07
4. /Archive 4:Discussion from 16/3/07 - 30/10/07
5. /Archive 5:Discussion from 30/10/07 - 13/01/09

Please leave any messages below :

Your removal of directly referenced evidence from the page on Scotch professors is not consistent with Wikipedia's philosophy. The references are all easily accessible: I got them with 5 clicks from the British Library website. Anybody can access them there (although, if you are not part of a UK academic institution, I think they may charge).

What do you mean by the message below?

(rv. given the choice between reliable contemporary, expert sources which state unequivocally that it originated with Queens and an uncheckable reference which sounds very much like OR il take former)

I suspect that you do not like the fact that your football club were not the first to develop passing. The "unequivocal" sources you mention have not considered the evidence that you have deleted, presumably for the same reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kinigi (talk • contribs) 13:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've commented on this on the talk page. Could it be resolved there, rather than both of you just reverting each other? Oldelpaso (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Loch mor bharabhais.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:57, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First and foremost, the map isn't completely accurate yet. I noticed three obvious problems with it immediately after uploading it (the Gaelic speaking colonies on northern Cornish coastline are missing, the northern green area on Skye is too small for the limit I set (40%+), and the extent of Ogham stones in Wales truely covers much more of the south of the country than that map currently indicates), but havent been able to find the time to correct it since. In Scotland in the green areas, 40%+ had a knowledge of Gaelic in Scotland according to the 2001 UK census. In the Republic of Ireland in the green areas, 40%+ classified themselves as daily speakers in thr Republic of Ireland according to the 2006 census. I did this because if you were to raise the cut off point to 50%, it would look as thought there was no Irish spoken in Meath, Waterford, Tiree or southern Skye. The most Gaelic speaking areas of Northern Ireland lie between 30-40%. I could change the limit if you wish. I wouldn't mind in the slightest. I am aware that in the Linguistic Study on the use of Irish in the Gaeltacht (Staidéar Teangeolaíoch ar úsáid na Gaeilge sa Ghaeltacht, 2008) that three zones of Gaeltacht were recommended; A (67%+), B (44-66%), agus C (30-43%). Donncha Ó hÉallaithe has done fabulous work on this issue over the past decade, and there's a heck of alot of info at www.anghaeltacht.net. (Although none/very little of it is in English.) But, this sytem would be too complex for this map. I have been planning in doing provincial maps of Ireland based on the afore mentioned reports findings (for use on the dialects' pages). I've already made a map of areas within Northern Ireland which are 30%+. There is however less data for Scotland. I remember up until about 2 years ago both the Scottish and Northern Irish census agencies desplayed superb data in excellent detail on their websites, but that is no longer available for Scotland, and the Northern Irish version came offline early last year due to an internet hacker scare. Many thanks for your interest. User:D.de.loinsigh (talk) 16 January 2009 05:45 —Preceding undated comment was added at 05:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

I see you are removing "Irish" from the name of the 'British and Irish Lions'. What is your reason for doing so, as there seems little need to such changes? PurpleA (talk) 22:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was "British and Irish Lions" in the 1970s, though media in Britain nearly always referred to them as 'British Lions'. I remember the name way before 2001. PurpleA (talk) 19:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2009 issue of the WikiProject Greece newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.--Yannismarou (talk) 01:33, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, An Siarach! Sorry to disturb you, but I saw from this category that you are a member of WikiProject Turkey, and the List of sultans of the Ottoman Empire is currently a featured list candidate. If you could take some of your time and review it on its nomination page, I would be very grateful. Regards. --BomBom (talk) 02:56, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Given your previous involvement with the Battle of Harlaw article, I thought I'd get in touch directly in case you're not still watching it. My efforts to start nudging it towards WP:GAN turned into a complete rewrite <g> - it's probably not much better as an article, but it is now paranoidly referenced. :-) I'm aware that there's stuff out there that I don't have access to right now - notably the Marren book - so if there's anything you can contribute on that front, that would be great. More generally, it would be great if you could just look it over for general tone - I appreciate that some of this stuff can be controversial and I'd rather establish a consensus now rather than during the WP:GA process. TIA. Le Deluge (talk) 00:30, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a fluent native speaker, you might wanna if you have time comment on the points raised regarding Iona and Ì at Talk:Iona#Translation. Not sure if Ak and I are agreeing, disagreeing or talking over each other here, but your guidance on Ì status as a "common noun" would be useful. I.e. if it only means Iona, or if it can actually mean island. All the best, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 02:04, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! There's an issue with the DYK nomination for this article. Please comment at the nomination page. Thanks! Arakunem^Talk 19:11, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Bob Stewart at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Alarichus (talk) 16:13, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The present reference structure is incorrect, but I do not edit that because the article might be in the middle of expansion. You probably know all what I'm going to say, sorry about that:
(i) You can use only (in line) "references" or a couple "references" + "notes". The latter is reserved for long sources (books); if they occur more than once in the text, one places a book (J. Smith, ...) in "references" and in the "notes" simply writes "Smith, p.37". If that book occurs only once, it should just be cited as in-line ref.
(ii) The work by Badsey (conference) is placed in "references" but is not linked anywhere. Meanwhile, there is another work by Badsey (book) in the "Notes".
None of this will affect DYK, just my usual grumpiness .. Materialscientist (talk) 04:26, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On August 16, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bob Stewart, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

WP:DYK 02:14, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

                   Possible Typo in the Gaelic William Wallace article?

Hi Siarach, could you please take a look at the first paragraph on the Gaelic article on William Wallace, as it seems to be saying that he was around in the twelfth century ("darna linn deug"?).cheers 92.235.178.44 (talk) 12:58, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is the reason for the speedy delete? --Abc518 (talk) 00:53, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello An Siarach! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Billy Kay - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:12, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, a user have requested rename on Meta-Wiki, if is possible, please handle this request. Regards --@lestaty ^discuţie 19:59, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I just took a look at the George Orwell page in the Scottish Gaelic wikipedia. It is absolutely pitiful. I know Orwell was English but surely as a Gaelic speaker you can give such a seminal writer more substance, a la Sorley MacLean, perhaps. Thanks for listening. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 23:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I hope you're doing fine and I sincerely apologize for this intrusion. I've just read your profile and saw that you're an enthusiastic Scotsman (I went to Edinburgh not that long ago and I really appreciated the people and the wonderful place! Beautiful and really nice!), so I guess that this helps you understand what are a minorized language and culture and maybe I am not bothering you and you will help us... I'm a member of a Catalan association "Amical de la Viquipèdia" which is trying to get some recognition as a Catalan Chapter but this hasn't been approved up to that moment. We would appreciate your support, visible if you stick this on your first page: Wikimedia CAT. Supporting us will be like giving equal opportunity to minorized languages and cultures in the future! Thanks again, wishing you a great summer, take care! Keep on preserving your great culture, country and language! Mar sin leibh!Capsot (talk) 07:00, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:24, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

JoshuaJohnLee ^{talk softly, please} 22:56, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arse fans.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 15:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arsenal spurs action goal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 15:05, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have recently started the article Opera in Scotland to try and rectify a huge oversight on Wikipedia. In this article, I deal with the surprisingly numerous operas by foreigners on Scottish themes, and also the pretty dismal Scottish output of opera.

I'm not a huge fan of the genre, but I appreciate that this is culturally important, and should be addressed on here. I think you're probably one of the more clued up Scottish editors, so I'm dropping you (and one or two others) a line to see if you could offer some advice, and improve the article. Anyway, I appreciate any help you might give.--MacRùsgail (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you have another look at Template:Gaelic demographics and check what I've done there. If I have understood the table correctly as it was, this seems to me a better way to present the information. On the other hand, if I have not understood it, then that is all the more reason why a revision along these lines is needed. I can fill in the rest of the fields with a calculator, but there is no point in doing that until you confirm that the distribution of data in my new version of the table really does reflect what was intended. --Doric Loon (talk) 10:19, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I created the account "Dalriada" on WP:fr on 10/02/2006. Since then, I have created 2.217 articles and made 85.134 contributions there. I have just started the "SUL process" in order to unify my accounts across the Wikimedia projects (see here). Unfortunately there is another account "Dalriada" on WP:gd (Dalriada, less than 150 contributions) which is the main obstacle preventing me to achieve the "SUL process". This account has not contributed since October 2012 and so I wonder if it is possible to "usurp" it. My account on WP:fr => Dalriada. If needed, I can of course post a message on my talkpage on WP:fr confirming this. Dalriada

Hello, I am having a dicussion on facebook and a student of Celtic linguistics is insisting on referring to Galloway Gaelic as "Irish" I was wondering if you had anything as a native speaker to say that I could use in hte discussion?

Mìle teing!

82.13.241.93 (talk) 14:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Eilean. Since you had some involvement with the Eilean redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 05:18, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mark Grossman. Since you had some involvement with the Mark Grossman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:07, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was wondering if you'd be interested in setting up Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey), based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). Now it's not a contest in itself, it's designed to motivate people to inspire others to improve content and build something which demonstrates the hard work going into the country which is visible. The focus is more on quality improvements but new articles are welcome too. Eventually a Turkish National Contest could be created to fuel it, like Wikipedia:Awaken the Dragon, in which contestants can choose to keep the Amazon vouchers themselves to buy their own books for more articles or put them into book fund to help editors further improve Turkish-related topics by giving them the books they want. It will begin though as purely an improvement drive. If interested, or you think anybody else might be interested, alert them and sign up on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Turkey talk page at the bottom. Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, An Siarach. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

Hello, An Siarach. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jamesjpk. I wanted to let you know that the Wikiproject Spoken Wikipedia, has been tagged with a semi-active tag. I am messaging you about this because you are listed under the wiki-project's list of active participants. Please contribute to the WikiProject if you want to keep it alive! I hope that it becomes active again! Jamesjpk (talk) 22:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.

Hello, An Siarach. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, An Siarach. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Decline of Gaelic in Scotland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:33, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- MrX 🖋 23:09, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lmao. Thig an latha, newbie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by An Siarach (talk • contribs) 16:10, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MrX has something like 16 times as many edits as you do, if he's a newbie then you're not even a twinkle in your daddy's eye. 74.175.117.2 (talk) 12:47, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Goodness gracious anonymous/IP user; what might have brought you to this specific talk page? What might have forced you to count up (I'll take your word for it, I'm not autistic) edit counts?

Pathetic, 'X'.

Hello, An Siarach. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, An Siarach. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi An Siarach! I am Galendalia (talk · contribs) and I am reviving the WikiProject for Spoken Wikipedia. I noticed that you signed up at some point to be a participant and as I am reviving this project, one of my tasks is to get the participant list in order. Would you please go to the Participants List and add your name and language(s) you speak? If you are already there and do not want to be, please remove yourself. If you want to remain, please put remain next to your name. If I do not see anything, I will move you to the inactive participant list. I am putting a timeline of 7 days on this action to help keep things moving along. It would also be great if you would be willing to join the task force for Pronunciation that would be awesome, as there are troublesome words we run into. Thank you for considering joining us. If you decide to leave, I will be sad to see you leave as so many people have done a great job on the recordings and any work you have done makes a significant difference. Galendalia CVU Member \ Chat Me Up 05:07, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello An Siarach! I hope this message finds you well and healthy! I am working this weekend on the Spoken Wikipedia project pages to get them in line with other projects. I just wanted to inform you in advance that some pages may be created. deleted, moved, or otherwise. If you have any questions, please feel free to post them on my talk page.
Thanks, Galendalia (talk) 16:17, 23 May 2020 (UTC) WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia Coordinator[reply]

Hello colleague, I am interested in the Middle Ages too. I created Category:Medieval civilizations which is part of Category:Civilizations by time. The former is nominated for deletion and at the moment the vote is 2:0 in favor of deletion. I am used to deletions, but this time I am stunned. I do not believe there is no place for such a category. I believe that most people with interest in history would agree that civilizations existed in the Middle Ages. I ask people to contribute their opinion to the discussion. Regards,--Maxaxa (talk) 02:43, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]