I notice you have placed an image at Ford Capri which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. It is poorly indicated on the Wikipedia help pages, but noncommercial-only images are deprecated here and will probably be removed in future. Would you consider changing to a license that does not have the noncommercial clause? —Morven 12:36, Sep 7, 2004 (UTC)

Good stuff! Nice to see another image contributor. There are huge numbers of articles begging for an image ... —Morven 13:03, Sep 7, 2004 (UTC)

There is a Mk3 [1] and a Mk4 [2] DVT, your amendment to the article suggests otherwise BesigedB 20:28, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Whereat in the Discworld canon occur the Lamp Wick Jokes? ♥ «Charles A. L.» 05:32, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)

You voted for Northamptonshire, this week's UK Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. -- Francs2000 | [[]] 22:21, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hiya, I've made a few modifications to the UK Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Week, and I thought you'd be interested in the new page and helping out again with it, as you have contributed in the past! :) Talrias | talk 21:09, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)

Yes I have several photos of Class 90s. Take your pick from EWS, Parcels, Virgin or Railfreight liveries. Our Phellap 23:37, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hey, just to let you know, an article you supported, Transport in the United Kingdom, is this week's collaboration. Cheers! -- Joolz 19:17, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Interesting indeed! Would you please cite your source with a link to the content you recently added to the Avoid the Noid article? —RaD Man (talk) 01:24, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rail-norwichstation-amoswolfe.jpg has been listed for deletion, as it has been replaced by a better one. thanks Bluemoose 14:22, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I hope you don't mind that I replaced the photo you uploaded to the "Methods of power" section. If you can find (or shoot) a photo showing the boiler of the locomotive, it would be more appropriate in that section. It's still an excellent image on the "Live steam" page, showing the contrast to the large 2-10-0. Could you put the scale of the Mamod engine into your photo caption, to point out the size difference - one might not realize it from the photos alone.

I also replaced the image on the Scale model page with something that is more appropriate - I think you must agree the Mamod is more a toy than a real scale model. --Janke | Talk 17:14, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

But sir! You should be proud that I do my business in the sandbox, not the article pages!

I've heard the story, quite long ago, and haven't heard it since then. ;) Neutrality^talk 03:19, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

From Zaini Suherly who was wrote Hejaz Railway in Wikipedia Indonesia (Jalur Kereta Api Hijaz):

The Photograph or Picture in that article was adopted from http://nabataea.net/hejaz.html

sincerely yours

Zaini Suherly 14:05, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My point Amos was that it is a rumour contrary to any evidence. If we include material like that in wiki we might as well add the moon being made of cheese.

Hello. I finally rediscovered my feature request after losing it for 2 months (very careless of me). Does your Flickr template exist? Nobody else contributed to that discussion. I suppose I'm nervous about what it might unleash. Ie, increasing the likelihood of Flickr tag spamming, perhaps. I'd be grateful if you'd let me know about the template on my talk page (as my Watchlist is so long I shall lose you if you reply here). Regards, --bodnotbod 02:47, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Excellent work, sir: that's marvellous. --bodnotbod 13:55, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• • Hmmm, doesn't seem to work very well on Ice cream, give it a try. Assuming the problem is that the pagename is more than one word, I think ideally I'd like to see it so that each word had a + sign instead of a space between words when it's transformed into the URL. I suspect something like that is going to be a lot harder to achieve. Let me know if the advice is to limit the template to one-word topics. Best wishes, --bodnotbod 20:01, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you gave User:203.26.2.2 as final warning for vandalism (on that user's talk page. I have reverted two items of vandalism, Kevin Johnson and Inca Empire.

-=# Amos E Wolfe ^talk #=- 13:39, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I've gone ahead and blocked the user for the persistent vandalism. -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 17:58, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

From here

When I try, it says 'the page cannot be displayed'. To be honest, I was going to make a List of fictional moles. I can only think of three, and one I'm not really sure it counts. Maybe it better be List of fictional moles and other borrowing mammals. AAAAAADDDR 11:22, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

If you read your comments above, you will notice both titles are red (or have a red question mark). Click the title of the page you want to create, and you will see a message that "Wikipedia does not yet have a page called List of fictional moles". Any text you enter in the box below will form the new page when you click the Save button. You could take a look at List of fictional rabbits to give you some ideas for page layouts, section headings, etc. Don't worry if you can only think of three fictional moles - others will soon add more if there are any. -=# Amos E Wolfe talk #=- 15:53, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

I know all that, but it really does say 'this page cannot be displayed', as in, the page is broken., there's a 404 etc. And now my row of links at the top, with my name and stuff, runs away and hides under the Wikipedia logo when I try and click it. Kid Apathy 18:56, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your recent edit to Sorcery (disambiguation). Disambiguation pages are not articles and as such have special style characteristics, which inlcude not providing excess wikilinks (which distract readers) and not using piping (which confuses readers). Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) has more information, and I'm happy to answer any questions. --Commander Keane 16:06, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for tidying up the page. I have quite a bit to learn:-) Collieman

Wikipedia now supports SVG images, would you be able to upload the image in that format? boffy_b 14:19, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed it would be nice to have a vector version, for example i just removed a traced shadow that looked really weired as it was the only one traced. But i'm sure i could have done a better job of doing so if i'd had the original vector source to work with. Plugwash 23:37, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed that you removed the comment about 'Marthwaite' from the maps on Sodor (fictional island).

Good stuff!

Had you considered doing this elsewhere too? The same comments exist on North Western Railway (fictional), and maybe other pages too (sorry, haven't checked). I thought about copying your edit, but then thought it would be more appropriate for you to do yourself.

EdJogg 12:20, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an SVG version of it? // Liftarn

You can use "pstoedit". --80.63.213.182 13:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion about whether we should set criteria for inlcusion of accients on the List of rail accidents page, and if so what the criteria should be.

The discussion is located at Talk:List of rail accidents/Criteria for inclusion, where your input would be most welcome. Thryduulf 00:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you might want to know about this, it has the same goals as Wikipedia:WikiProject Photography, but is better organized. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. --Gphoto^talk 19:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I see you've signed up to the Photo matching service for Northampton - I'm there as well - good to meet you! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 13:45, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can I invite you to a discussion on the future of this template, and the possibility of creating two template from this one at Template talk:Midland Main Line. L.J.Skinner^{wot|I did} 18:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi, do you know how to type this: '|', without copying and pasting, in other words, what is teh key combination?

P.S finally got round to adding pics of trains on their pages, quite a few I still want to upload though!

could you please answer on my talk page?

Llamafish 20:10, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much, do you know a way to get the images visible of the peckett etc?

--Llamafish 20:49, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is the same with some of the images on my fotopic site, I can't see them either —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Llamafish (talk • contribs)

Funnily enough, once you have said that, I can see them fine now, without having to do anything! they came up straight away when I loaded the page!

Llamafish 07:10, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I have afew of the new extension, I will upload when I find them!

did you get the email about the Yahoo group?

Llamafish 17:56, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of songs with personal names: A, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs with personal names: A. Thank you. Corpx 01:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can convert a PDF to SVG. If you'd upload the PDF to Commons or email it to me at wiki at keeleysam.net, I'll convert it and upload it. Thanks! --Keeleysam 15:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rail-97651-amoswolfe.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:08, 8 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 00:08, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you moved this page? Where is the discussion/ consensus? Please revert yourself, Orton Mere is not just a railway station. 163.167.129.124 11:36, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you haven't quite read the first para: "Orton Mere is a station[...]and several moorings for boats navigating the River Nene" David Underdown 14:34, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The point is it is not just an NVR station, as anyone who has spent any time in the city would know. How many railway stations do you know that have "several moorings for boats navigating the River Nene" etc. The station is only one part of Orton Mere. Please revert the move as per my original request, as there has obviously been no discussion/ consensus reached for it. Also, I do not understand your comments here. 163.167.129.124 08:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, is there still a problem? Pacific Coast Highway ^{{talk • contribs}} 01:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TEST TEST TEST

I don't have any of it!!!

I may take one or two next time I go up

I haven't been able to get up there!

Llamafish 18:05, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AmosWolfe thank you for your recent contributions on articles related to theme parks in the United Kingdom. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject UK Theme Parks, a WikiProject which aims to improve the quality of all UK theme park related articles on Wikipedia. Feel free to leave a message on the talk page, hope to see you over there! Seaserpent85Talk 22:45, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the rational to the Joe Meek/Bobby Graham/Outlaws image. And you did it before I was even finished my tirade? Life is good. Carptrash 15:30, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note, incase your not watching, check out Talk:West Coastway Line#Map Template, about the use of the {{tl:BS template}}. While i'm chatting to you, thanks for all the work in moving routemaps to the template namespace ;). Pickle 20:46, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the Image:Wikipedia-lolcat.jpg that you had uploaded (User:Katr67 is where I saw it). I've seen the images before, but seeing it on Wikipedia made me, well, laugh out loud. While I don't have graphic resources to design an image, consider yourself a recipient of the I CAN HAS BARNSTAR?. Thank you for brightening this editor's day. —C.Fred (talk) 23:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for welcoming me. (User:Naglfar_or_Gleipnir?) I can actually edit even though my school's IP is blocked, constantly, due to the "funny" edits. Bye! —Preceding comment was added at 02:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

I saw your name at Wikipedia:Photo_Matching_Service. I revised the pages at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in England. Please consider adding your name to the top of the page at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Northamptonshire and to any of the other subpages for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in England. Thanks. GregManninLB (talk) 01:32, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please create one for me please? I would appreciate it very much! --hello, i'm a member | talk to me! 02:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!--hello, i'm a member | talk to me! 04:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the assist. I checked the settings, but no joy. I was starting to have other problems with my system, so re-installed it. Everything else is fine, but still can't edit:-(( BugZilla informed. Cheers, --dick (talk) 14:51, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pete-Atkin-Album-Lakeside-Sessions.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 20:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You responded to me on the Village Pump, but it didn't really answer my question, which I made clearer.

And I'm having the problem right now. I can't copy and paste my signature because I have something else copied but not pasted.

Okay, apparently it always clears up after the first edit. Still, the piped link or whatever can show up in the wrong place without my knowing why.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 14:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dean-friedman-albumcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the GWR logo picture to the Ambigram article. You might not have noticed there's a lot of contentious editing happening their right now (recently, two editors combined to remove about 1/3 of the content). I've moved the GWR logo to the talk page for discussion. Please comment there and feel free to jump into any other discussion on the page. RoyLeban (talk) 17:50, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AmosWolfe! A Wikipedia:WikiProject Northamptonshire has now been created. If you wish to help out improving articles relating to anything in the county, please don't hesitate to go to the page and sign up! --Kudpung (talk) 13:18, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AmosWolfe! A Top Priority article you have been involved with has many issues and urgently needs improving. If you can help with these issues please see Talk:Northamptonshire, address the different points if you can, and leave any comments there. (This is a generic message. if it has been placed on your talk page inadvertantly, please ignore it.) --Kudpung --Kudpung (talk) 23:08, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contribution to the page List of Great Central Railway locomotives earlier on today, it looks better than my own 48305 picture by far. I publish this because I will of course, as the possibly page's biggest contributer continue adding more information on the relevant subject in question, but it would be nice to replace any of my stock photos if the quality is superior to them. The images of D4067, 4141, 63601, 30777, 78019 and several of the LNER Teaks are worth replacing because when I took them they were either rushed from a carriage window or else taken with huge amount of sunlight clearly shown within them, plus the picture of 70013 doesn't always seem to "work" due to the wherabouts of the photo's taking being away from the railway itself, so see what you can find if possible. Yours sincerly. —   DuchessofSutherland (t/c) 20:34, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw from here that it's been exactly five years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 05:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BR Mk1 GUV.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:BR Mk1 GUV.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:BR Mk1 GUV.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:22, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:7536 Aylestone 6-72.jpg is now available as Commons:File:7536 Aylestone 6-72.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:41001 in loop 1972.jpg is now available as Commons:File:41001 in loop 1972.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:26, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:151001 Matlock.jpg is now available as Commons:File:151001 Matlock.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:27, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:44004 Cardiff.jpg is now available as Commons:File:44004 Cardiff.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:28, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Class 45 No46 at Derby-5-73.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Class 45 No46 at Derby-5-73.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:29, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hastings set 1004.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Hastings set 1004.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:30, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:British Rail class 140.jpg is now available as Commons:File:British Rail class 140.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:30, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ATP-E IN YARD.jpg is now available as Commons:File:ATP-E IN YARD.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 03:32, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why the renaming? I've had a quick click around of relevant links, and the only place I can see 'Delapré' rather than 'Delapre' is in the image banner on http://www.delapreabbey.org/. Northampton Borough Council uses 'Delapre', Ordnance Survey uses 'Delapre', and even Friends of Delapre Abbey uses 'Delapre' on the rest of its site. Why should Wikipedia use what looks to be an obsolete historic form of 'Delapre'? Matthew (talk) 21:30, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dr-busker-amoswolfe.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nlr-tjloco-amoswolfe.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nlr-tjloco-amoswolfe.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rail-reedhamswingbridge-amoswolfe.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 14:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rail-reedhamswingbridge-amoswolfe.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 14:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:45, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing AmosWolfe a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 00:48, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[3] What's going on? Is this an official move, or some sort of joke? I obviously missed the discussion. I imagine hundreds of broken templates now.. eg Template:York Junction, Leeds and Selby Railway, 1840 Template:Hull & Barnsley Railway Template:Cawood, Wistow and Selby Light Railway are all bust, I had these on watchlist - no mention.

Can't some bot do this task, should I ask about this?Sf5xeplus (talk) 19:58, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Trains#Railway_icons Sf5xeplus (talk) 20:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. If a bot has been given the task should the icons not be changed manually at all? I wonder if the bot will come along and swap the ones you swapped...

I think the best thing to to would be ask the bot owner if it's still working.Sf5xeplus (talk) 11:32, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you have been fixing alphabetically - when a bot can be got working it can start from where you left off.Sf5xeplus (talk) 12:10, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Trains#List_of_articles_already_fixed I've assumed you've fixed all the articles up to "Bristol", starting at "aaa" - is this correct.?

If you go further can you update the list. Thanks.Sf5xeplus (talk) 19:00, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amos,

I'm no expert on the line diagram templates, but for some reason your edits today to Template:Romford to Upminster Line broke the presentation of the main article Romford to Upminster Line. The problem was raised at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#Someone with coding skills, and as a temporary solution I reverted your changes. Perhaps you can fathom out what went wrong?

David Biddulph (talk) 13:40, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, re this and similar edits: it's my belief that {{BS template}} should be outside the {{WikiProjectBannerShell}} (it's not a WikiProject banner), so I've started a thread at Template talk:BS template#Placement. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:11, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your work putting CONT icons on waterway maps. I have had to revert a couple, however, as they imply a continuation where there is not one. The two branches on Trinity Broads do not go anywhere, and the Southwold Harbour railway branch stops at the harbour, rather than continuing into the North Sea. Bob1960evens (talk) 18:35, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please check that waterways actually continue somewhere before just adding CONT symbols on to the end of everything. I have just had to delete quite a lot from the Cambridgeshire lodes. Bob1960evens (talk) 23:55, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have just found the Template:River Thurne map. What evidence and sources do you have for a continuation of Martham Staithe beyond what was originally shown, please? My OS maps show it as a short stub as it was originally drawn. In some cases it has taken considerable poring over maps and books to get the details right, and now I suspect I might need to check lots of maps for inaccuracies caused by the addition of CONT symbols where there is no evidence that the waterway continues. Bob1960evens (talk) 23:01, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have just removed a CONT icon from Template:Aberdare Canal map, since there is no evidence that it ever continued beyond its terminus. Bob1960evens (talk) 10:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rail-duck-western-engine.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 06:53, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Amos, a page I contributed has been listed for speedy deletion - but I am not sure how (where?) to put the hang on tag and a reason why it shouldn't be. Please help! (I am asking you as you originally sent me a welcome email when I joined!), thanks PaukiPKK (talk) 14:02, 11 November 2011 (UTC)PaukiPKK[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:South London Line requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bulwersator (talk) 15:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Film-labyrinth-anim-amoswolfe.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 00:43, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Maps-sodor-railways-amoswolfe.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:48, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dr. Busker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Busker (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:04, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly the best sentence anywhere on Wikipedia: "The original East Norfolk Railway crossed Bure Valley Lane at this point, by means of a level crossing, but the combination of heavy traffic and small steam trains is not encouraged in modern transport policies." Thank you for making me smile. Cheers DBaK (talk) 19:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want me to semi-protect your userpage? You seem to attract some particularly nasty trolling there.--Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 21:39, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please. I am assuming the recent spate of vandalism and trolling is as a result of my reverting of vandalism elsewhere on Wikipedia, and the messages left on talk pages of new and IP users. -=# Amos E Wolfe ^talk #=- 22:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I didn't set an end time so if you feel like testing the waters with unprotection in the future just drop me a note or make a request at WP:RFUP. I find that the majority of the time if your userspace is undergoing a spate of vandalism it means you're doing something right! --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 22:53, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia was a terribly selfish and unconstructive thing to do. I shall start contributing constructively at once and shall never countenance such irresponsible behaviour again.

With utmost sincerity,

Treasury Tag — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.131.131.63 (talk) 21:38, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You expressed an interest on the UK Rail page for moving the pages Reedham (Norfolk) and Reedham (Surrey). I've put them up to be moved here and here, together with Whitchurch (Hants) here. If you have the time to !vote, it could make a real difference to the outcome. Lamberhurst (talk) 11:50, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Amos, I am interested in the varying uses of the word "radial" in regard to steam valves. Many texts say Walchaerts is a radial valve gear. Are they wrong and why?

The Engineer from 1889 mentions the Herman Winters' Radial and rotary valve fitted to the Stevens long toe cutoff.

I am trying to organize the "valve gear" article section names.

I don't see how the Hackworth gear works. I see the connecting rod connected to the slide. Is the eccentric on the other side of the loco? Where is there a drawing of the gear?

Why was "Radial valvegear" article redirected to the "valve gear" article without a rigorous definition of the "radial" name as used in Wikipedia? Douglas Nelson Turner (talk) 02:45, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 20:34, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I got caught up in a editing war with OMPIRE because he keeps deleting the segment in Operating system advocacy that deals with open source zealotry because he's a open source software fanboy. I know he's very committed to the FOSS community, but it's gotten to the point of zealotry.

Hi, I'm Conde da Wiki153. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Phantom Pop, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Conde da Wiki153 (talk) 21:45, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I received a message a few seconds that said you are now patrolling The Reflection Tour page. Last time, someone did this too and deleted the page. I don't know why this page should be deleted since there are sources that certify that these numbers are correct and not unreliable. Please do not take down this page, as this tour is on-going and is receiving popularity. I am committed editor to this page. If you want to talk to me, this is my talk page. Raulruiz73 (talk)

AmosWolfe, Please note that text & pix (translated from German WP) have been added to Arnold Lyongrün, which was nominated for speedy deletion by you. Thanks! Sca (talk) 14:38, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AmosWolfe, why does this notice keep showing up? Sca (talk) 20:20, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shieldfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nexus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You recently nominated the article Red light running for merge. I'm in agreement with the basic idea. The article author has removed the merge template and continues to make good faith(?) edits that ultimately aren't making the article any better. He (presumably a "he" given the name) has been given a Twinkle welcome, but has not made any edits to name space or talk space -- his or any article's -- and it is unclear if he is even aware of the proper way to object to a proposed page merge. Also, I should mention that he did not remove the merge tag from Traffic light#Legal implications. At this point, I'm tempted to use the study itself, along with secondary sources to write a paragraph or so for the appropriate section of the Traffic light article, and then nominate Red light running for deletion. Is this too bitey? Is there a better way to handle this situation? (I'll watch here for a reply.)  Etamni | ✉  04:22, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AmosWolfe, Very belatedly in answer to your question on the George Street tram stop talk page... yes that is George St. but the livery is the old red / white and not the current green etc. one. Also (if you are at all interested) to my mind the stop s-box at the bottom of the page is the wrong way round. George St. is the stop after East Croydon on all routes and the one before Church Street. But I am not at all familiar with the way these boxes are conventionally written, & it can be read as correct in that it precedes Church St. (!) Thanks. Regards, Eagleash (talk) 16:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	This guy is awesome! ...Just Awesome! Amir R. Pourkashef 14:05, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello, AmosWolfe. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 16:43, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Module file —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. 83.138.245.164 (talk) 14:46, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment on my Wikipedia wall. I used to live near the railroad track that connects Canada to NYC. Allygggggg (talk) 18:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Northants 4x4, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Northants 4x4 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Northants 4x4 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AmosWolfe. Thank you for the recent review of The Garrick Inn. Earlier, another user revised the page and I think removed all of the references, describing them as 'bad sources', without saying why they were bad! I put the sources back in and you don't appear to have found a problem with them. Would you mind taking another look to confirm the sources are ok? Many thanks, --LegereScire (talk) 22:31, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unfamiliar with the template options for the Transit project. If there is such granularity in the options, its a Light Rail system, not Subway. There are few bits that are underground for a number of yards, but its primarily street level. Spotted on Talk:Mountain_View–Winchester_(VTA) --John (User:Jwy/talk) 21:46, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These used blue icons for two reasons:

1. The convention for Bus Rapid Transit seems to be to consider them in the same category as light rail, etc.;
2. They match the header colour (often applied to heavy rail rapid transit line diagrams).
   

Will you revert? Useddenim (talk) 01:14, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your addition to the Tramlink article as Wikipedia is not a news source, the derailment is currently in discussion on the talk page. Please do not re-add this until the conclusion of that discussion. Thanks! Jeni ^(talk) 23:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to click on users that are Shay Mitchell, Taiwanese / Filipino, Janelle Susan Sheetz, and his! Did you find someone older than me? Qua from How Helen is not an old. That's why I'm sick of Polynesia, 1978, January 3rd/Kimberley Locke, & also the Stephens family! Did you make it (user page) with them? User page comes first. Why don't we go on/be active/are alive anymore? --violetnese 16:29, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

. When am I going to follow contribs? --violetnese 16:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am a single birth. I like it when you were a 1978! Not the Sabara twins. Yours. --violetnese 20:04, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want a boyfriend. Taylor Hicks is going to love Katharine McPhee the most. Can you find me one, Harry? I think he does NOT care about the oldest child but he DOES care about the youth. Lindsay Lohan and I are NOT younger than/allowed to go out with YOUNG SILVERFOXES, I'm going to be killed! Spread the word! That was not does! --violetnese 20:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Discworld-Susan-Sto-Helit-Janet-Chui.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chester and Holyhead Railway RDT has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Useddenim (talk) 00:48, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AmosWolfe, thanks for reviewing The Cat Who Thought He Was A Tiger.

Coolabahapple (talk) 13:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

and 4 adding a picture. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:59, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have just listed several of the articles you reviewed for deletion, including Lore m. dickey that you accepted from AfC. DGG ( talk ) 01:07, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have deleted the page REDPRO however this is not advertising this is an actual company that is engaged in real estate activities in Lebanon, similarly to RE/MAX and many other companies that have pages on wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Real_estate_companies. The point of having a wikipedia page is not to advertise for the company, the company is already investing in online advertising. The page on wikipedia was created to contribute to the knowledge that is being shared on wikipedia and no advertising material was included on the page. I was not able to contest the deletion of the page as that option does not exist. What to do to get the page back up? Thank you for your help. MYF2014 07:07, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Anarchyte. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Philippovskaya school, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:03, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome! I'm not affiliated with the website drivetribe.com, I just named my account this because creating the wiki page was the first thing I planned to do. I attempted to make the page with a neutral point of view following Wikipedia policy. DriveTriber (talk) 04:09, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input! I was reading trough disambiguation pages and more, meanwhyle I tried to make an article, my mistake. I confess I'm a little lost but I'll take my time and come back with an article about vircator as it should be. The page should be deleted as it is now it won't comply. Mrantunes (talk) 20:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cannabis#Can_we_file_states_only_by_.2Ahighest.2A_category_in_Template:Cannabis_in_the_United_States.3F. 06:44, 30 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk • contribs)

Hello, AmosWolfe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

Hello, AmosWolfe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So without any sort of discussion you moved the page 'for consistency'.... You should appreciate that this was not an arbitrary title: this is not a UK only page. I deliberately chose the expression RAIL because railway is European terminology and railroad is American (amongst others). Every railway/railroad in the world has route knowldege, and my intention is to have an international page where people from other countries are encouraged to contribute their information. And that's not going to happen if it has a UK only title. Dr Sludge (talk) 11:58, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AmosWolfe. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Heritage Railway connections to the National Rail network".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 20:13, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AmosWolfe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Maps-sodor-railways-amoswolfe.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:59, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is in English as was my stub. Why have you gone to my talk page making ridiculous false allegations? Stop wasting my time. ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 06:16, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I use an automated tool to help fight vandalism and fix other issues on Wikipedia. At the time I added the notice, an IP user had made an edit to the article which had changed it into Spanish (this has now been reverted). As part of the tool's options, it can add a message on the talk page of the user who created the article in the first place. It looks like the IP user reverted their own edit shortly afterwards. -=# Amos E Wolfe ^talk #=- 07:44, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Watercess Line. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Watercess Line redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:22, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AmosWolfe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AmosWolfe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Spendlove is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Spendlove until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tacyarg (talk) 19:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mitcheldean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coleford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Skarloey Railway RDT has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hog Farm _Bacon 21:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spandau Suburban Line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:51, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:G-link Bundall extension has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mackensen (talk) 17:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Railways of San Serriffe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mackensen (talk) 17:47, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rail transport in fiction has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:50, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TransLink Major Route Diagram (pre-Evergreen with 97 B-Line) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:54, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wadebridge to Wenfordbridge has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 08:58, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sodor Railways has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 13:16, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bodmin RailTrail has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]