Archive Pages:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rock (confectionery), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Løkken. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I just viewed your map of the Netherlands (politically, including special municipalities), that is used on the English language article about The Netherlands.

I noticed that the borders of the provinces were not correct in some places. About 20 years ago (not sure of the exact year) the borders between Utrecht and Noord-Holland, respectively Utrecht and Zuid-Holland changed. Your map reflects the pre-90's situation for the province of Utrecht. Detailed maps can be found on the Wikipedia articles about for example the province of Utrecht (Dutch language).

Kind regards!

Youssef — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.170.56.30 (talk) 14:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alphathon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Great map! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are adding a lot of maps that have no labels on them. How is a reader supposed to know what he is looking at? Srnec (talk) 04:50, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's actually the standard format for maps of the type that I am adding (i.e. locator maps, which exist purely to show the territory's location and extent rather than to show, say, the location of specific battles etc; see Wikipedia:WikiProject Maps/Conventions § Locator maps (one area).) If you look at, for example, the Margraviate of Brandenburg or the County of Holland, you should see a map in the same format, but which was not created by me. This is true for many of the territories of the later Holy Roman Empire (HRE) (specifically those which existed in 1350, 1560, 1618, and 1648 as those are the periods for which sets of maps have been created).

In some cases it is certainly true that due to lack of context maps of this type can be quite opaque to the reader/viewer in some cases. I have specifically avoided creating such maps i.e. I have only uploaded maps which I believe give sufficient context to be understandable; for example, I couldn't think of a way to give adequate context to a map of the County Palatine of Tübingen so haven't (yet) uploaded one. I would note whoever that for maps of this type the idea is to elaborate on their content in the prose where necessary. The purpose of maps is not to be content in and of themselves but rather to clarify the prose. Part of the reason for this is that blind individuals cannot see a map and therefore rely on screen readers (which can only read text) to understand the content.

Of the ones I have uploaded recently all are territories of the HRE, and all include a small cut-away section showing the location within either the German Kingdom, the HRE as a whole, or, in the case of the early northern marches, Europe as a whole (as well as the HRE). If you have any issues with any of the maps in particular please feel free to let me know. Also, if there is a consensus to do so I have no issue with adding some minor labels (rivers, important cities etc) to some of the maps.

Alphathon /'æɫ.fə.θɒn/ ^(talk) 14:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Alphathon, I saw this image you made: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/Mitteleuropa_zur_Zeit_der_Staufer.svg/8291px-Mitteleuropa_zur_Zeit_der_Staufer.svg.png And I find your map really awesome and am trying to find a similar map for the year ~1100, but I'm struggling to find one of sufficient detail. Since you made the other one I was hoping you might have one roughly for the time period I'm looking for, or might point me to the right direction? Thanks and best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.66.144.100 (talk) 13:34, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have done one that shows the territories of the German Kingdom at the beginning of the 11th century* (Deutschland um das Jahr 1000.svg) based on a public domain scan (Droysens-22-23.jpg) from the same book as the 13th century one. Note that while the SVG version only includes labels for the stem duchies and similar territories the original includes names for pretty much every sub-territory/Gau, as well as settlement names. That's as close I can can get you, but hopefully they're close enough to suit your needs.

*although the source is labelled as "Deutschland um das Jahr 1000", i.e. "Germany around the year 1000", it is actually at least 1004 since it includes Bohemia.

Alphathon /'æɫ.fə.θɒn/ ^(talk) 04:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Alphaton, sorry, it's not exactly what I was looking for, since I was more interested in the smaller counties that made up those large duchies which are quite well known. It's still an awesome map. Thanks for your effort! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.65.179.119 (talk) 11:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MorbidEntree. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Belarus have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using {{ping}}) 02:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MorbidEntree:. I was wondering what exactly about my edit was unconstructive. As it stands at the moment there is a space between the apostrophe (soft sign?) in Rus' and following comma, which as far as I can tell is undesirable (it is considered incorrect in English to pre-space commas etc) and exists because Belaya Rus' is italicised using wikicode (''), which is obviously incompatible with a normal apostrophe. This is why the {{'}} template exists: to allow single-quotes/apostrophes and italic/bold wikicode to live happily side-by-side. If the issue is the small preceding space it generates perhaps nowiki tags (i.e. <nowiki>'</nowiki>) would be preferable, or perhaps html italics tags could be used instead of the wikicode (i.e. <i>Belaya Rus'</i>). Alphathon /'æɫ.fə.θɒn/ ^(talk) 03:07, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for that. For some reason it didn't click that you were doing that. I had thought that it was an edit made in error. I have now undone my reversion. --MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using {{ping}}) 03:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Alphathon /'æɫ.fə.θɒn/ ^(talk) 03:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alphathon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.links]].

You are encouraged to change

<font face="sans-serif">'''[[user:Alphathon|<font color="#900">Alphathon</font>]]'''&nbsp;<small>/[[Help:IPA_for_English|'æɫ.fə.θɒn]]/&nbsp;<sup>([[user talk:Alphathon|<font color="#900">talk</font>]])</sup></small></font> : Alphathon /'æɫ.fə.θɒn/ ^(talk)

to

<span style="font-family: sans-serif;">'''[[user:Alphathon|<span style="color: #900">Alphathon</span>]]'''&nbsp;<small>/[[Help:IPA for English|'æɫ.fə.θɒn]]/&nbsp;<sup>([[user talk:Alphathon|<span style="color: #900;">talk</span>]])</sup></small></span> : Alphathon /'æɫ.fə.θɒn/ ^(talk)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 22:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 17:26, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 05:20, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Province of Saxony, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Herrschaft (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Circle (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kreis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Percnidae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Superfamily (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

i found your name on a map you created for the Wikipedi page :Comté de Toulouse.

I'm surprised to see that on your map the city of Toulouse is not included in the County ?????

Can you check it that ?

Thank you for you work

Michel

PS : please forgive my bad english, i'm French — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.228.86.82 (talk) 07:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't make that map per se, but I did make the one it's based on: Blank map of Europe 1000.svg. (It isn't your fault; the uploader Gundan did not attribute it properly.) If you are saying "Why is Toulouse not marked on the map?" then you'll have to ask Gundan, who made the map. If you are saying that Toulouse lies outside the boundaries on the map, I suggest you check Europe byzantine empires.jpg, which my map is based on and clearly shows Toulouse inside the borders. Alphathon /'æɫ.fə.θɒn/ ^(talk) 09:35, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alphathon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alphathon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for fixing the table alignment in the Faiyum Governorate table. That's exactly what I was hoping for but didn't quite know how to do it. Now that I see how it's done maybe I'll find the time to fix all the other ones. Kind regards, the eloquent peasant (talk) 02:13, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Camulus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:18, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'd need to look more closely but my first impression is that your expansion [1] is in effect mainly about the history of the province. This can lead to duplication because that topic has its own section. Those two sections should be edited together to avoid duplication. The name section should be fairly short I guess.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 15:03, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're not wrong, and there's possibly some stuff in there which is unnecessary (e.g. its probably not necessary to mention the treaty which partitioned it). Ultimately though, the name is a reflection of the province's origin and history, so some of it is unavoidable while still remaining useful. It is also worth noting that the previous version suffered from a similar problem (while not actually explaining why the province got its name).

How about this?:

The name Limburg was not applied to the territory of Belgian Limburg until the 19th century. The territory broadly coincides with that of the County of Loon, which after the late 14th century became one of the main parts of the Prince-bishopric of Liège. In the late-18th century following the French Revolution and the Campaign in the Low Countries, it [was conquered by Revolutionary France and] became part of the Lower Meuse Department of the French First Republic (later the First French Empire), along with a significant part of what would become Dutch Limburg.

After the Congress of Vienna in In 1815, this department was reconstituted into the Province of Limburg as part of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands. The province did not include Limburg itself, which was (and still is) part of the province of Liège; rather, it was named in honour of the pre-Revolution Duchy of Limburg, which had some territory within the new province (predominantly the Overmaas [nl; fr; de; lb]). This province was divided in 1839 by the Treaty of London; the western portion was recognised as a province of the newly-formed Kingdom of Belgium, while the eastern portion remained part of the Netherlands and became the Duchy of Limburg (not to be confused with the pre-Revolution state), which eventually became the modern Dutch Province of Limburg. [between the newly-formed Kingdom of Belgium and the Kingdom of the Netherlands, with both portions retaining the name Limburg.]

Alphathon /'æɫ.fə.θɒn/ ^(talk) 20:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Andrew Lancaster.

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How can I get the blank map of europe with disputed regions to match up in size to the historical versions? I want the borders to align but i have no idea how to crop or resize it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toadmario64 (talk • contribs) 00:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I'd like to use your map of Poland-Lithuania in 1714: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Poland-Lithuania_1714.svg#/media/File:Poland-Lithuania_1714.svg

I'm submitting my history dissertation for publication, and this would be very helpful. From what I can tell of Wikipedia/Wikimedia rules, re: copyright and copyleft, I can just take this map. Is this alright with you? Would you like me to attribute it to you in the caption? (Image courtesy of ______.)

Please let me know at k.odyniec@berkeley.edu

Thank you :)

Christoferens Apersilvestris (talk) 07:56, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Alphathon:

Okay, got it, I have copied the license link and I will add it; thanks also for the improved image. I appreciate your help navigating this wonderful world Wikimedia.

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hesse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Friedberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alphathon. Thank you for your work on Kreis (Habsburg monarchy). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Subdivisions of the Kingdom of Galicia and Lodomeria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lesnica.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a couple of discussion on Talk:List of best-selling video game franchises and wondering if you would like to get involved P+T Fan Of Lion King 🦁 (talk) 16:18, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PlayStation 3 sales has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:39, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alphathon,

I am writing to you to ask whether I would be able to use your HRE map that you made* to create a 3d printed puzzle for me to sell. Please try to contact me soon so I can figure out the logistics.

• linked here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mitteleuropa_zur_Zeit_der_Staufer.svg

Sincerely, Zerkanagar Zerkangar (talk) 16:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]