Hello, I'm Andrew nyr. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Baloch people because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 03:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm HistoryofIran. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --HistoryofIran (talk) 11:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it is very good that you are discussing with me as an adult, I did not insult you, but I did not understand the word "wha?" (what?). You are rolling back my legal edits and spreading false information yourself

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1004261330

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Baloch_people#Please_protect_the_Baloch_people_page

I know the principle of Wikipedia very well, and I also know that Wikipedia was not created by supporters of the Iranian regime, you demanded a source from me (proof of the same fact).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1001209416

I added the source but you rolled back anyway Why?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1001220888

There are alternative explanations for this: you get paid and you just do your job, guarding articles day and night that are in the interests of Persian nationalists. Do what you want, but do not break the rules of Wikipedia, do not spread such false information

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/989576032

your actions suggest that you just want to destroy Baloch history! don't do it please... Ali banu sistani (talk) 14:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ali banu sistani, you must immediately cease from speculating about other editors' motivations —especially about them being paid for editing!— including their national origins or political allegiances. That is completely unacceptable. Any further violations of that nature are likely to be met by sanctions. Thank you. El_C 14:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's good that you paid attention, but you attacked the wrong one, pay attention to my answer Historyofiran I just ask them not to spread false information, please do not pass by. Regarding my answer that they are paid for this, I myself admitted that these are alternatives, you understand that. All contributors have the right to file a complaint against large contributors if it is correct! This is the Wikipedia principle! Ali banu sistani (talk) 15:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Negative, Ali banu sistani. As I made clear to you above, even making that as a speculation, an "alternative," or otherwise hinting about it in any way whatsoever is strictly prohibited. On Wikipedia we consider that harassment. You need a detailed, comprehensive and coherent report, one which includes diff-evidence, to even ask for an investigation about that (which I highly doubt you'd be able to provide). I strongly advise you not to pursue that line of inquiry further. It's unlikely to go anywhere and probably just gonna cause you serious problems here. El_C 16:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kami2018. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Khanate of Kalat have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please do not remove referenced information. Kami2018 (talk) 04:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi this is your edit

The Khanate of Kalat and the Genesis of [Baluch-] Brahvi Nationalism... 

And what did I see when opening the fifth link?

" The study portrays the decline and disintegration of the Baluch khanate of Kalat during the last decades of British rule, analyses Kalat's lack of integration but increasing attachment to British Indian affairs, and summarises the colonial legacy of Baluchistan in respect of political, administrative and constitutional development. "

You are not linites, open the link and see for yourself, and write my answer, I'm waiting! Ali banu sistani (talk) 05:10, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samandar Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mastung. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thanks i fixed! Ali banu sistani (talk) 14:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mehrab II of Kalat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ahmad Shah.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Khanate of Kalat; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the Wikipedia rule very well, but I did not understand your inconsistency, and in the rodebo my edits, as usual, do not violate the rights, but I will have to file a complaint against you !!! Ali banu sistani (talk) 20:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've already been told to behave appropriately in the past. Next time you do stuff like this [1] you will be reported. Consider this a warning. --HistoryofIran (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Wali Mohammad Khan Leghari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://sanipanhwar.com/A%20Narrative%20of%20a%20Visit%20to%20The%20Courts%20of%20Sinde,%20by%20James%20Burnes%20-%201831.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Nausherwani (family), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Principality of Kalmat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hormuz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Take your concerns in talk page , as others have told you in your talk page, you shouldn't involve in edit wars, specially when you are dead wrong.

You need to find a source for self-confirmation of your edits, and no one will bother you!☺ Ali banu sistani (talk) 20:39, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Khans of Sahiwal. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:19, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Khans of Sahiwal. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:43, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have already been warned by multiple users of misbehaving. This is a last warning, otherwise you would be reported and possibly be indefinitely banned from Wikipedia. HaughtonBrit (talk) 16:39, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ali banu sistani. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Muslim battle of Jihad, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:04, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ali banu sistani. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nausherwani (family), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DIVINE. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Principality of Kalmat—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. DIVINE 📪 21:40, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ghurid dynasty, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:28, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ali banu sistani: You keep reverting this article from the redirect which was put there after the page was reviwed at WP:NPP. The article is fundamentally decent except its badly referenced. It is contingent on yourself that if you remove a redirect, you must provide the sources required to bring it up to standard. Edit warring on it, isn't going to fix the problem of lack of sources and will get you eventually blocked. I will leave it there for today. If can't put the reference by tonight then i'll need to put back to a redirect. scope_creep^Talk 10:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I created this article in accordance with all the rules, I did not copy it, this is an original and competent article, but basically it is the history of the Baloch people, who are not very respectful of the right on Wikipedia from Iran, sort of like a member of Historyofiran. Nobody tells me to pay for my edits, everything is original and competent. have a good day! Ali banu sistani (talk) 10:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me why I shouldn't report you to WP:ANI for constantly bad mouthing me. I haven't even you been in contact with you for months. Do I live that rent free in that head of yours? I couldn't care less about the Baloch or any other people for that matter. I do however care when disruptive users like you attempt to constantly disrupt Wikipedia with pov edits. You'll see what I mean in the upcoming ANI thread in a few hours. --HistoryofIran (talk) 06:29, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

this is when I scolded you, you prove it from the first, then I don’t destroy Wikipedia, all my edits were approved by other administrators, except for you, of course, your rude speech “I don’t give a damn about Baloch” is confirmed by your actions, I know this for a long time, but I’ll be back with new power... Ali banu sistani (talk) 09:46, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:35, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dayaram Gidumal writes that a Balochi legend is backed up by the medieval Qarmatians.^[1] The fact that the Karmatians were ethnic Baluchis is also confirmed by the Persian historian in the 16th century Muhammad Qasim Ferishta.^[2] Ali banu sistani (talk) 15:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baloch diaspora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brahui.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:38, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia as a battleground for incivility and personal attacks.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 18:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why did you block me? by this edit? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Qarmatians&oldid=1131325104 Ali banu sistani (talk) 09:38, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The battleground mentality displayed in the summary of that edit is indeed one of the main reasons for your block. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:46, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ali banu sistani (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here Ali banu sistani (talk) 09:31, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Insert your reason to be unblocked here" is not a reason to unblock you. 331dot (talk) 09:46, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

hello, can they explain to me or proved for what reason they blocked me so that I can explain (my mistake or something) Ali banu sistani (talk) 09:53, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ali banu sistani (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here Ali banu sistani (talk) 10:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:55, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, can they explain to me or proved for what reason they blocked me so that I can explain (my mistake or something) Ali banu sistani (talk) 10:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ali banu sistani, you might not be able to see all the relevant messages on a mobile device. Please open this page on a desktop computer and you might see what has happened.

I had blocked your account because you seem to have used Wikipedia as a battleground for incivility and personal attacks, such as in the edit summary of Special:Diff/1131325104.

Additionally, you seem to have evaded your block, by editing using a different account, or by editing without being logged into your account. Both is prohibited in your situation, as the block applies to you as a person.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

such a reason to unlock is not enough! I immediately admit that Persianists will not like my edits, for example, they immediately deleted my page about Kalmat Principality and although it was approved by other administrators, I demand an unlock, and my last warning! Thank you. Ali banu sistani (talk) 13:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Principality of Kalmat Ali banu sistani (talk) 13:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ali banu sistani (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here Ali banu sistani (talk) 13:32, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The redirect Principality of Farrukhnagar has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 7 § Principality of Farrukhnagar until a consensus is reached. SurajThakur001 (talk) 10:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]