It looks like they'll be running two Danganronpa 3 episodes every week, one from each story arc, on separate days, so two episode lists would work fine. [1] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:53, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

You mean two separate pages? If it gets too long, maybe, but if they're both 12 episodes long or something it shouldn't be a problem to have both on the same page. They're still part of the same show.--IDV^talk 21:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Two separate sections. I was concerned they would be broadcast at the same time but the announcement says they aren't going to mix so we won't need the interleaving of the episodes. They can stay on the same main article for now. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Sure. That makes perfect sense to me.--IDV^talk 21:53, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Hey, hopefully this is the right place to do this - I'm new here - but I just wanted to address some of the comments made during the editing of the Danganronpa 3 page. The show's mainly know as Danganronpa 3: The End of Hope's Peak Academy in the fandom, on its respective wiki, on Kotaku, with Loot Crate, etc. I've noticed a lot of individuals ignoring FUNimation's inconsistent translations in general and merely sought to create a sense of consistency insofar as relating to the games' English canon. In no way was it meant to suggest one title was better than the other, and if it came across that way then I apologize. As for the short key issue, I was intending to correct the articles in question as well, but obviously that will no longer be the case. I do see where you're coming from with your arguments, however, and I'll keep them in mind as I continue to improve. Seeking Ellery (talk) 10:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

@Seeking Ellery: No worries. I know where you're coming from - I personally find it annoying that Funimation doesn't use the same terminology as NISA - but when we write on Wikipedia, we go by what reliable secondary sources say about a subject, and try not to express our own personal opinions in the articles. If some sources do call the show The End of Hope's Peak Academy, then yeah, we can cite those sources (by adding a link to them within <ref></ref> tags) and write "also known as...". While we should generally use the official English title for a work as an article title, I could see there being an argument for using "Hope's Peak Academy" in the prose when referring the the school itself, but I am unsure. I would probably start a discussion thread on the article's talk page and ask people for their opinions.--IDV^talk 11:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for understanding about both my inexperience on the site and sharing in the misery, as it were. I have a couple of articles referring to the show as "The End of Hope's Peak Academy," so I'll do as you suggested and reference them for the addition (Kotaku turned out not to be one of them - whoops). If you - or anyone, for that matter - think they are insufficient, then by all means give 'em the ax. Kinda learning all this as I go. Appreciate the time and advice! Seeking Ellery (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Just wanted to thank you for cleaning up the references and compliment the nice compromise that was made on the Danganronpa 3 page concerning the whole "High School"/"Academy" issue - addresses it, gets the point across and looks nice and clean. Again, appreciate all the help! Seeking Ellery (talk) 08:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

The article The Cottage (video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Cottage (video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Judgesurreal777 -- Judgesurreal777 (talk) 13:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Hey, I just wanted to thank you for some of the article you've created that I've stumbled upon recently. I recently really got into Steins;Gate, and am interested in the Science Adventure series now, and liked your article on Chaos;Child. I also like your article you wrote for Fault Milestone One - the game just recently came on my radar due to the E3 announcement, and I was thinking I'd go make an article for it. Little did I know you already created a good start for it a few months ago.

Anyways, just expressing appreciation, since we both seem to dedicate a lot of time to the obscure japanese video game sector of Wikipedia. Sergecross73 msg me 14:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

I'm glad you like the things I've worked on! Aside from enjoying these games myself, it feels meaningful and rewarding to improve on an obscure game's article that would likely never be worked on (or not for a long time) if I hadn't done it myself - this is also what drew me to my recent GA, The Cottage, where almost all coverage is in Swedish only. Speaking of which, I was a bit surprised to see how underdeveloped most Ace Attorney articles were before I started working on them recently - they seemed popular enough for someone to have worked on them already.

But yeah, I really like the Science Adventure series - just wish more of the games were available in English. Been thinking about doing some clean-up on the Steins;Gate article ever since I played that game, but it feels like a lot of work - it's ranked as a GA, but focuses too much on plot/character details, and the anime stuff should probably be spun out into its own article. Maybe I'll get around to that after I'm done with the Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney - Dual Destinies article.--IDV^talk 15:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ace Attorney Investigations 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 00:25, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Ace Attorney Investigations 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ace Attorney Investigations 2 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 09:41, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Any of your articles for one of mine? Perhaps Characters of Chrono Cross? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

@Judgesurreal777: I wouldn't mind a review swap, but I haven't played the Chrono games yet, and want to play them without knowing about the story and characters beforehand. Would it be all right if I did Brave Fencer Musashi instead?--IDV^talk 20:25, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Sounds good! Any preference on yours? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:27, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

@Judgesurreal777: All right, cool. I don't mind which one you review - pick whichever seems the most interesting to you.--IDV^talk 20:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

And, done! Let me know if there is anything else you see. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:05, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney − Trials and Tribulations you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Judgesurreal777 -- Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ace Attorney you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 13:20, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

The article Ace Attorney you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ace Attorney for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 09:41, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2016, the project has:

208 Featured Articles 70 Featured Lists 10 Featured Topics 1 Featured Portals

27 Featured Pictures 1070 Good Articles 20 Good Topics

---

Content

Changes to Featured and Good content News items and announcements

WP:VG Talk Page Digest Follow-up: Gender Declaration in WikiProject Video Games

---

Project Navigation

• VG Project Main pages

  • Main project – talk
  • Project category – talk
  • Portal – talk

  VG Project Departments

  • Assessment – talk
  • Cleanup – talk
  • Peer review – talk

   

  • Reference library – talk
  • Newsletter – talk
  • Video game images – talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chaos;Head you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 15:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

The article Chaos;Head you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chaos;Head for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 21:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Danganronpa Unlimited Battle gameplay.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:07, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

@AntiCompositeNumber: I only uploaded it minutes ago, and had not yet written the image caption for the article it is now used in. Surely that short period of time before clicking "save" must be okay?--IDV^talk 22:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, you're good now. Thanks! AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Danganronpa: Unlimited Battle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Continue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

The article Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney − Trials and Tribulations you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney − Trials and Tribulations for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rachel Helps (BYU) -- Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

The article Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney − Trials and Tribulations you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney − Trials and Tribulations for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rachel Helps (BYU) -- Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:21, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

First off, thanks for asking for reviewers on the WPVG Talk page. Second, I have a question regarding Uchikoshi's statements on the ending to VLR. He says that he added the extra ending after the 2011 earthquake and tsunami. Obviously, this is already in the article, but one thing that strikes me odd is that it seems a bit contradictory to what's in the article, which currently states that he changed how the original ending played out, not that he added an additional ending to the game. Since I don't own The Untold History of Japanese Game Developers, could you say the Uchikoshi's exact quote regarding the ending. Famous Hobo (talk) 04:46, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

@Famous Hobo: All right:

KU: I really forget quickly about the things I write, and regarding 999 I think it was as it is. There was no other ending. However, for Virtue’s Last Reward, the game was completed when the earthquake struck, in March 2011. It was completed, but with that ending we felt that it’s a bit . . . Not cool to go with it. So we did change it a bit, and added something.

JS: I’ve not actually seen this ending. Could you describe the changes? SPOILER ALERT!

KU: The ending was really crisp. You might want to put a SPOILER ALERT. What happens is that human kind is all destroyed, nobody survives. At this point somebody goes back into the past, and the original ending was to go back to the past, change a little bit so that the future is saved, and then it finishes. However, this felt a bit crisp and sudden. So what we did is, we added a lot of content to say that you, by going back and working in the past to change the future, thanks to your efforts there is some hope. To give it a more positive nuance.

I don't think this contradicts the later statement (as seen in the Siliconera source), but I believe I at the time was under the impression that Uchikoshi only added things onto an already existing ending rather than adding another Novel section at the end, separate from the main narrative - both of these would be "changing how the game ends", but he wasn't changing the actual ending.--IDV^talk 07:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

• @Famous Hobo: I, too, think reception is one of the more difficult things to write, so I started working on the VLR reception in my sandbox - feel free to edit there, so we don't both do the same thing separately and do twice the work needed.--IDV^talk 09:03, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi there. I've just been doing some work on the article for Persona Q: Shadow of the Labyrinth. Basically, I've expanded the lead, created a proper development section, and added a gameplay image. I'm not that keen on taking it any further, but the rest of the article should be very easy to get together. If you wanted, you could easily polish it up, expand it a little further, then take it to GA. --ProtoDrake (talk) 12:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

@ProtoDrake: Looks good! I enjoyed that game way more than I thought I would, so yes, I'd like to do that. I'll add it to my to-do list.--IDV^talk 12:43, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Yo. You rated the Shenmue III article a C on the quality scale. Could you tell me why? I was actually pretty pleased with the article and might have nominated it for GA had it not been for a subject that is due to change dramatically (ie the video game has yet to be finished and released). If you have some suggestions for what we could improve, I'd love to know. Thanks! Popcornduff (talk) 03:22, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

@Popcornduff: Don't worry, it wasn't because of any quality concerns - the article looks good and on the right track, it's just that I would be very hesitant to rate a game article (for a game that isn't cancelled) above C if it doesn't have anything about the game's gameplay or reception. If you look at WP:VG/A, the criteria for B is "The article is mostly complete and without major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards", which I believe the Shenmue III article can't fulfill until more information is available.--IDV^talk 09:36, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Cool, thanks for the reply. Interesting - I never thought of that. I always thought of article quality in terms of what information can be reported, so right now the Shenmue 3 article is as good as I can an article about a subject for whom stuff like reception or gameplay is, by definition, unknown. I guess it makes sense that you could never end up with a great article about a subject that can't be well understood, though. Popcornduff (talk) 12:52, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chaos;Head (anime) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 01:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steins;Gate (anime), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Escapist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:New Danganronpa V3 main visual.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

The article Chaos;Head (anime) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chaos;Head (anime) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 21:03, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

I understood that you deleted all the rival units within Project X Zone and Project X Zone 2's page, however, they in the game, Rival Units and enemies are categorised differently. Rival Units are listed as key characters within the game. Because it is a crossover series, it is recommended to highlight key video game characters from franchises if they appear in a cross-over. Just look at Namco x Capcom's page for instance. All rival units are listed and that game is a Prequel to Project X Zone. In order to maintain consistency, I've added the rival units for Project X Zone and Project X Zone 2.

Namco x Capcom page

With my new edits, I decided not to add cameo characters as part of Wikipedia's policy. Please discuss with me your thoughts before reverting the edit. This is a community site at the end of the day so we both have to agree as to what's best :)

Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 11:20, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

I haven't played the games myself, but if that's the case, then yeah, I guess it makes sense to list those characters.--IDV^talk 11:33, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Really? well that's a surprise. I stress that you get Project X Zone 2. It's dirt cheap and is a love letter to all things Sega, Capcom and Bandai Namco.

Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 11:13, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Haha, I actually do own a copy of Project X Zone 2, I just haven't gotten around to playing it yet - there's just way too many interesting games coming out.--IDV^talk 11:15, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Hey, I noticed you recently changed the VLR article according to WP:VGSCOPE, removing the cast list to improve the article to FA standards. I'm not sure if you're an expert in this field, but I'm trying to bring Spec Ops: The Line to FAC quality, do you think I would need to remove the cast list there like you did? The section image adds the names of the voice actors, the setting has the VAs in parantheses, and the plot section has VAs in parantheses as well - but it's missing the VA for one character since the VA doesn't have an article. From what I understand of this, the plot section should have the VAs removed, but the setting can keep the VAs? Since there's only 3 listed, which are the main characters. Liar's Lair (talk) 21:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

@Liar's Lair: Well, I'm not an expert, but my understanding is that if you have information about the casting, then that can go in the development section, and that cast lists in themselves aren't relevant for video games the way they are for films. I would either just follow VGSCOPE (like I did with Virtue's Last Reward) or ask editors at the VG WikiProject. I was not part of the discussion(s) leading up to it, so you can probably get better answers from people who were.--IDV^talk 22:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

From what I've seen of the articles that VGSCOPE lists as examples, it seems like it would be a good idea to expand on why Nolan North was chosen as a voice actor in the first place (and find a reliable source demonstrating this), since that's actually significant in the context of what the wider game sets out to achieve - I think many of the other cast names can be removed though. I'll follow up on this at the WikiProject page - thanks for the reply. Liar's Lair (talk) 01:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

So I think this is the first time the Video Game project has a Featured Article that starts with "Z". Thanks for making that a thing. GamerPro64 02:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Ha, I suppose it is. Hoping that we'll be able to get another one eventually.--IDV^talk 08:34, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Great work on getting Virtue's Last Reward to FA! ThomasO1989 (talk) 04:32, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

		The Userpage Barnstar
		I enjoy your user page style and adapted it for my own, hope you don't mind. And noticed your got your first bronze star at English Wikipedia, congratulations! It's admirable that you promoted dozens of high-class articles within one year, that's hard to image in my home wiki :) --A Sword that in the Wind (talk) 19:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

• @風中的刀劍: No problem, and thank you!--IDV^talk 19:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article AM2R you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 19:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

The article AM2R you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:AM2R for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 21:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

The article AM2R you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:AM2R for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 23:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney − Dual Destinies you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 05:01, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

The article Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney − Dual Destinies you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney − Dual Destinies for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 21:40, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

The article Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney − Dual Destinies you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney − Dual Destinies for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 23:21, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shin Megami Tensei II you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 16:00, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

You seem enthusiastic about video games. I invite you to this discussion. --George Ho (talk) 17:57, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

The article Shin Megami Tensei II you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Shin Megami Tensei II for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 18:40, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

The article Shin Megami Tensei II you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shin Megami Tensei II for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 20:41, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mystery Dungeon: Shiren the Wanderer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 10:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

The article Mystery Dungeon: Shiren the Wanderer you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mystery Dungeon: Shiren the Wanderer for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 22:21, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Danganronpa: Unlimited Battle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 06:21, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

The article Danganronpa: Unlimited Battle you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Danganronpa: Unlimited Battle for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 15:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

The article Danganronpa: Unlimited Battle you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Danganronpa: Unlimited Battle for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cognissonance -- Cognissonance (talk) 16:01, 28 October 2016 (UTC)