I reverted your edit to Good Girl Gone Bad. If you want to test edit, you can use the sandbox. --The Legendary Sky Attacker 05:21, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure why you removed a valid rating of Life Starts Now by TuneLab Music, but your edit has been reverted. If you have a reason for this, I invite you to re-edit the page as well as state the reason on the article's Talk page. Daniel Musto (talk) 23:28, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is a very good idea about putting the reviews in a template as you did. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 19:10, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Better Off Ted. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 09:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw that you changed the "Cast" section at Black Swan (film). While most cast members are displayed in a bullet list, this is a different approach where names can line up better. Bullet lists in general are encouraged for their simplicity, but the main list of names is complete and will not need to be changed. Any additional content can go in prose below the list. Erik (talk | contribs) 23:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Some of the recent edits you made, such as to Loud (Rihanna album), have been reverted, as they appear to be unconstructive. If you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. --Dan56 (talk) 03:41, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

You requested a reassessment of this album's article, the article is rated C, and can't be rated any higher without at least another prose section such as: recording, history, background and such. Zidane tribal (talk) 05:44, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Mad Gear and Missile Kid has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough sources dedicated specifically to this EP to warrant a stand alone article; fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. A section dedicated to this release already exists at Danger Days: The True Lives of the Fabulous Killjoys.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fezmar9 (talk) 02:58, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed your work on the article Restless and want to make sure you realize we are in the middle of a Good Article review. When that's going on, it's customary to check in on the Talk page and introduce yourself before making substantive edits, as well as to check on assignments, and what people have said they'll be doing. I am going to be writing a more comprehensive Background section tomorrow, as I've noted on the Talk page, which will cover all (and more) of what you've written. There's no problem with what you did, I'm just making sure you take the time to check out what's going on before doing anything more. Thanks.--TEHodson 19:40, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I rate it a B, good work, but here`s a couple of thing you could do to get it up to GA:

The lead section needs references, even if the information is repeated elsewhere, a more complete personnel section and remember to separate performing personnel from technical and producing personnel, and finally a sample goes a long way in making an article looks more fancy. Zidane tribal (talk) 19:05, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Bjork, and thanks for joining! Project activity has been low lately, but be sure to add the project page to your watchlist to stay in the loop about discussions, possible collaborations, etc. --Another Believer _(Talk) 18:58, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Rihanna (book), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rated R (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Regarding this edit, I realize that the diff of my changes was a bit confusing. What did you mean by relative information (and why do you think it needs to be in this article)? --MZMcBride (talk) 05:53, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You don't seem to use talk pages much, so I've gone ahead and reinstated my changes, but in multiple edits to make it clearer what I was doing and why. Please let me know if you have any questions, comments, concerns, &c. --MZMcBride (talk) 14:59, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks so much for the help with an article I made Jemima Kirke looks so good! Greatpumkin (talk) 23:10, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why thank you! :) AndrewAllen15

No problem! If you get a chance sometime, can you check out Alex Karpovsky also from the show Girls, but it's in sort of rough shape... if you could neaten it up, that would be great! Greatpumkin (talk) 23:30, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When I find some time, I'll see what I can do. :) AndrewAllen15

thanks! it will be quite the project as whoever started it up put up so much info that its sort of overwhelming! by the way I peeped in on the Jemima Kirke article, really awesome! great work!`Greatpumkin (talk) 17:25, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	AWARD OF EXCELLENCE
	I saw what you did with Reb'l Fleur. and may I say, you did a fantastic job. However, I would like you to help me write an article on Rihanna's second fragrance Rebelle. Keep up the good work. Hope to hear from you. Deem97k (talk) 06:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aw, thank you! I would really like to help out with making Rebelle if you're still up for it. AndrewAllen15

Hello, I'm writing here to let you know that I've recently begun a discussion to review the deleted and redirected Category:Gay Wikipedians (which now points to Category:LGBT Wikipedians. instead of being it's own category) If you have the time, please add your thoughts on the deletion review to the current Discussion. Thanks! Ncboy2010 (talk) 12:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have started reviewing this article. You can find some comments at Talk:Reb'l Fleur/GA1. AIRcorn (talk) 11:38, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I have failed this article. I decided there were just too many problems to fix in time. Don't be to discouraged, GAs can be quite challenging. The article is not bad, it's main problem is the quality of the sources used. I have left some advice on the review page (also transcluded on the articles talk page). Hopefully it will be useful if you wish to renominate. AIRcorn (talk) 22:23, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stars Go Dim (EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stars Go Dim (EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:25, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Love Gone Mad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Gone Mad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:05, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm a researcher from the University of Minnesota conducting a study on LGBT user contributions to Wikipedia. Would you be willing to answer a short five minute survey? If so, I would appreciate if you could drop me an email at leung085@umn.edu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weiwensg (talk • contribs) 22:51, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AndrewAllen15. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keiran Lee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kirsten Price. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AndrewAllen15. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alec Knight (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alec Knight (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:41, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnny Sins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Sins (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to keep your article, I recommend voting and argue in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Sins (2nd nomination). Subtropical-man (talk / en-2) 13:34, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder that per WP:USERNOCAT, user sandbox pages such as User:AndrewAllen15/sandbox are not permitted to get filed in article categories as if they were completed articles. This is not subject to your own personal discretion or choice — it is a hard rule that must be followed and has no special exceptions for any reason. I see that the same categories have had to be repeatedly removed from your sandbox page at least five times this year, including three times just in the past 11 days alone — so do not readd the page to article categories again, because it is not allowed to be there. Please also be aware that you can be temporarily or permanently editblocked for being disruptive if you choose to ignore this notice and readd it to categories again anyway. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 01:12, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steve Holmes (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evil Angel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AndrewAllen15. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AndrewAllen15. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tim Von Swine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AVN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dale DaBone, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Complex and AVN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mr. Pete, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forced Entry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aaron Brink, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:13, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sean Michaels (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Leslie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I Hate Suzie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jack Napier (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AVN.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your efforts. :)

MisterN1C022 (talk) 22:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I saw that you're the one that created The Mad Gear and Missile Kid. I wanted to let you know that I merged it into the Danger Days article. All of the info is still there, so thanks for contributing! The Sharpest Lives (contribs) 18:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Pornography Barnstar
		Given for your continued hard work improving and expanding articles related to everyone's favorit subject. Demt1298 (talk) 01:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, seriously thank you so much! Happy to be a part of the team :) AidenTheMaiden (talk) 17:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]