Hi, it seems you copied the content of your edit to Transport in Oman from skyscrapercity.com. If the copied post was not yours, this would appear to be a copyright violation. I noted this on Talk:Transport in Oman -- please reply there. Cheers, Rvollmert (talk) 13:38, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a violation of copyright, because author marki is not different from User:Advanstra, but thanks for your concern and keen observation. Effort saved by writing the details once and placing on both sites: Skyscapercity a good forum but Wikipedia more definitive --Advanstra (talk) 05:34, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A drafted new version of the Manual of Style for Thailand-related articles has been started here. Still at issue are specific naming conventions for Thai royals and nobles and settlements. As a member of WikiProject Thailand, you are welcome to contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Thailand#Updating the Manual of Style (part 2). Paul_012 ^(talk) 18:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Come on, add a license before it gets deleted. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 10:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Silly me, the upload page got refreshed somewhere during upload and the license (and category) information disappeared. No need to be so terse. --Advanstra (talk) 11:58, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Qantas Flight 32, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qantas Flight 32 until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bidgee (talk) 05:37, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Airbus A380#Incident - 4 Nov 2010 where your views are invited. Mjroots (talk) 05:40, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Advanstra, I'm not going to escalate the warning level for now. Please concentrate on the issue at stake, not who holds the view. I opened the discussion on the talk page of the A380 article because the aircraft is "high-profile" and it is probably better not to be WP:BOLD here. The discussion is aimed at garnering consensus. By all means argue for a stand-alone article there, but be prepared to accept that general consensus is that a stand-alone article is not justified. If consensus at the AfD is that the incident justifies an article, then I'll help bash it into shape. This is something that you could do yourself, though that would not guarantee the survival of the article. Mjroots (talk) 06:15, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want a bit of space to work on an article, place {{inuse}} at the top of the article and save. Then edit the article, but don't forget to remove the template when you've finished. Mjroots (talk) 06:47, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE the warning you issued to me. I suggest you get your facts straight before you start accusing editors of acting in bad faith. The AfD nomination was placed by Bidgee at 05:37, a full twelve minutes after you created the article at 05:25. It was not placed by me a minute after you created the article. Bidgee created the AfD discussion at 05:37, but forgot to add the category template, which I added at 05:41]. I then discovered that the AfD notice had a redlink, which I fixed at 05:57.

Furthermore, I have not edited the Qantas article since 9 April 2010], so your accusation of edit warring on the article is also groundless, and could be seen as a PA by you on myself. Mjroots (talk) 11:11, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that, i've double checked and agree those accusations i made relate to another user. I was confused as they just occured at the same time.--Advanstra (talk) 16:02, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed personal attacks and offensive comments from other users. Those users are warned that their comments have been archived for future reference and they may themselves be blocked from editing in the future.

The nomination of an article at AfD in good faith is not a personal attack on the creator of the article, and should not be seen as such. It's early days yet, and it may well be that the article is kept at the end of the discussion. I'm open to changing my !vote, but at the moment I consider that the incident doesn't quite reach the threshold for inclusion. If, for example, the grounding extended to all RB-900 engined A380s, then I would say that the threshold had been met. Your best bet is to leave the discussion to run its course, and work on improving the article. It would do no harm to add the incident to {{Aviation accidents and incidents in 2010}}, and add that template to the article. Further sources that you might consider using are Flight International and Aviation Herald. Finally, thank you for striking the warnings you issued to me. Mjroots (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advise on the AfD, I'll leave the discussion to take its course. Others have already added the template and made notable contributions, but i'm tired of editing for now, particularly if some others are that keen to have it deleted and the edit warring on the Qantas article. --Advanstra (talk) 15:34, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:49, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		Shortcuts WP:HWY WP:HWY/E WP:HWY/AS WP:HWY/AF WP:HWY/O WP:HWY/LA
- - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Highways - - - - - - - - - - - -
Hi, Advanstra, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the International Highways WikiProject and its new regional taskforces! The Highways WikiProject is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, or anything related to International Roads. This includes supporting existing regional road WikiProjects and fostering the development of new international highway WikiProjects. We have recently created five regional task forces focused on Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania and Latin America. To improve road and highway articles, here are guidelines for B class criteria. Please add any higher GA, FA quality articles to the international roads portal. Also, please help out by inviting new or unfamiliar editors with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/New articles/Invite template.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

JCbot (talk) 01:51, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you have contributed a lot of info on the bridge. Can you confirm that the article is correct, that there is a pedestrian walkway on the bridge? that it is possible to walk across the bay? Thanks. polihale 217.195.147.49 (talk) 08:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is indeed a pedestrian walkway and cycleway on the eastern side of the bridge and a fishing platform. It is possible to walk across the bay, this walkway was built to replace the walkway on the old Hornibrook Hwy bridge.--Advanstra (talk) 15:46, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know I have used one of your photos here:
http://www.lgam.info/motorway
and I will probably use one or two more on the site.

Darkenfair (talk) 04:01, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Brisbane Meetup Next: 11 February 2013 5-8PM - Drinks and light dinner at SLQ with Sue Gardner Last: 3 August 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup on 11 February 2013 with Sue Gardner, Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation.

More details can be found at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/7. I hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 06:52, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Wikipedians in Gold Coast)

Hi Advanstra,

I have noticed that you have edited a number of Australian road articles, and are listed as a member of WikiProject Highway's Oceania Task Force. I have recently started up a new project for Australian roads, with the goal of improving Wikipedia's coverage of Australian roads – currently the vast majority of articles are stub or start class. The project pages are located at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads, if you want to take a moment to look around, and join up if you're interested. Thanks, Evad37 (talk) 01:48, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:HWY/O

Nbound (talk) 05:27, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 06:17, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:HWY

Nbound (talk) 22:59, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am interested in hydronymy as it looks the language of prehistoric Europe is reflected therein. I left a message on the wikiproject rivers talkpage, just looking for editors with similar interests to exchange information. I have discovered the so called old european hydronymy is not limited to Europe but has many correspondences in Iran, India and furhter away so I think this disproves the current scholarly etymological interpretations. Presently I am trying to research Bengal and Burma.Aldrasto11 (talk) 10:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will be presenting a Wikipedia edit training session on the Gold Coast on Tuesday 25 June, as part of the partnership between Wikimedia Australia and the State Library of Queensland. 10+ new editors will be editing their first article at the session and past experience has shown it’s helpful if there can be at least 2 people present to assist with answering questions. No public speaking is required, just one-on-one assistance with new editors. Your name was mentioned as a possibility as it is believed you live in that region. If you are able to assist, please get in touch with me, preferably by email kerry.raymond@wikimedia.org.au Kerry (talk) 06:06, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Advanstra, I noticed you were an Australian member on WP:HWY. As you may or may not be aware, there is now a wikiproject focusing on Australian roads. We are always looking for new members, feel free to join us if you are interested :) -- Nbound (talk) 05:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gold Coast Highway may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• is on the [[Gold Coast railway line]], part of the [[Citytrain]] network in South East Queensland). Inter-urban services operate frequntly along the electrified line between Brisbane and Varsity

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please have a look at the map ofpower stations in Queensland? I can't get the icons to show up! Thanks--Graham Proud (talk) 03:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Thanks for your help, only now I have a whole lot more work to do, putting up maps for the rest of the plants in Australia! Cheers!--Graham Proud (talk) 14:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Any suggestions on how to improve the article?Guru-45 (talk) 18:50, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look at the article. The article focuses on the spiritual significance of the river. It is a bit hard to understand the geography of the river. Here is a list of some improvements --Advanstra (talk) 14:16, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• 1. Separate the geographical information with the spiritual by using headings.
  
• 2. A shorter introduction
  
• 3. Add an Infobox River template
  
• 4. Add a map of the river
  
• 5. Some images of the river
  
• 6. Seems the river has changed its course, so perhaps a map with the old courses and one with the new courses, and making the paragraphs shorter
• 7 Categorize the river in a geographical sence

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Gold Coast Airport page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of ring roads, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:46, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of ring roads, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chonburi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Southern Moreton Bay Islands, Queensland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russell Island, Queensland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Advanstra, I'd like to use your photo of Eyjafjallajökull in a television show. Can you please email me? JEN (at) COMMITTEEFILMS.COM. Thank you so much!

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iceland_Eyjafjallaj%C3%B6kull_from_S%C3%B3lheimaj%C3%B6kull.JPG

50.194.196.193 (talk) 20:23, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is least one polar route which is not on the list -- New York to Seoul.

See Talk:Polar route

I'll let you know of any others I discover. 86.143.67.134 (talk) 00:21, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From FlightRadar24.com between 2015-04-23 20.00Z and 04:00Z Planes at/near the most northerly point of their journey, with Track= ~270 degrees Some of these positions may be estimated; But based on a filed flight plan or the standard route; So the positions should be quite accurate.

UA835 / UAL835 United Airlines ORD Chicago PVG Shanghai STD 10:40 AM CDT ATD 10:50 AM CDT STA 1:55 PM CST ETA 12:56 PM CST Aircraft(B744) Boeing 747-422 Registration(A04BAE) N118UA Altitude 34,000 ft Vertical Speed 0 fpm Speed 510 kt Track 258° Latitude 80.6091 Longitude -175.834 Radar T-FAA3 Squawk N/A

UA89 / UAL89 United Airlines EWR New York PEK Beijing STD 11:50 AM EDT ATD 12:00 PM EDT STA 1:45 PM CST ETA 12:39 PM CST Aircraft(B772) Boeing 777-224(ER) Registration(AABA9A) N79011 Altitude 34,000 ft Vertical Speed 0 fpm Speed 495 kt Track 261° Latitude 80.7514 Longitude -172.3605 Radar T-FAA3 Squawk N/A

DL583 / DAL583 Delta Air Lines DTW Detroit PVG Shanghai STD 12:10 PM EDT ATD 12:52 PM EDT STA 2:40 PM CST ETA 1:52 PM CST Aircraft(B744) Boeing 747-451 Registration(A8EF8C) N675NW Altitude 34,000 ft Vertical Speed 0 fpm Speed 499 kt Track 284° Latitude 79.7047 Longitude -152.2546 Radar T-FAA2 Squawk N/A

AC87 / ACA87 Air Canada YYZ Toronto PVG Shanghai STD 1:00 PM EDT ATD 1:06 PM EDT STA 3:15 PM CST ETA 1:58 PM CST Aircraft(B77W) Boeing 777-333(ER) Registration(C0173A) C-FIUR Altitude 32,000 ft Vertical Speed 0 fpm Speed 524 kt Track 272° Latitude 82.0332 Longitude -151.9318 Radar T-FAA1 Squawk N/A

CA990 / CCA990 Air China JFK New York PEK Beijing STD 12:50 PM EDT ATD 12:54 PM EDT STA 2:20 PM CST ETA 1:30 PM CST Aircraft(B77W) Boeing 777-39L(ER) Registration(780022) B-2089 Altitude 32,000 ft Vertical Speed 0 fpm Speed 539 kt Track 270° Latitude 79.0469 Longitude -164.0901 Radar T-FAA3 Squawk N/A

DL189 / DAL189 Delta Air Lines DTW Detroit PEK Beijing STD 12:27 PM EDT ATD 1:21 PM EDT STA 2:45 PM CST ETA 2:47 PM CST Aircraft(A332) Airbus A330-223 Registration(ABB775) N854NW Altitude 36,000 ft Vertical Speed 0 fpm Speed 474 kt Track 270° Latitude 79.0975 Longitude -161.9485 Radar T-FAA3 Squawk N/A

UA807 / UAL807 United Airlines IAD Washington PEK Beijing STD 12:35 PM EDT ATD 12:50 PM EDT STA 2:40 PM CST ETA 1:39 PM CST Aircraft(B772) Boeing 777-222(ER) Registration(A1E2C4) N220UA Altitude 36,000 ft Vertical Speed 0 fpm Speed 493 kt Track 241° Latitude 82.7329 Longitude 173.799 Radar T-FAA3 Squawk N/A

UA851 / UAL851 United Airlines ORD Chicago PEK Beijing STD 1:00 PM CDT ATD 1:20 PM CDT STA 3:15 PM CST ETA 2:26 PM CST Aircraft(B744) Boeing 747-422 Registration(A01553) N104UA Altitude 34,000 ft Vertical Speed 0 fpm Speed 500 kt Track 270° Latitude 80.887 Longitude -162.5425 Radar T-FAA2 Squawk N/A

AC31 / ACA31 Air Canada YYZ Toronto PEK Beijing STD 2:50 PM EDT ATD 3:00 PM EDT STA 4:05 PM CST ETA 2:43 PM CST Aircraft(B77W) Boeing 777-333(ER) Registration(C02CF1) C-FRAM Altitude 32,000 ft Vertical Speed 0 fpm Speed 526 kt Track 263° Latitude 80.8041 Longitude -170.1407 Radar T-FAA3 Squawk N/A

KE94 / KAL94 Korean Air IAD Washington ICN Seoul STD 1:35 PM EDT ATD 2:06 PM EDT STA 5:10 PM KST ETA 4:00 PM KST Aircraft(B772) Boeing 777-2B5(ER) Registration(71BD26) HL7526 Altitude 34,000 ft Vertical Speed 0 fpm Speed 495 kt Track 267° Latitude 80.8424 Longitude -167.7178 Radar T-FAA3 Squawk N/A

KE82 / KAL82 Korean Air JFK New York ICN Seoul STD 2:00 PM EDT ATD 2:28 PM EDT STA 5:20 PM KST ETA 4:23 PM KST Aircraft(A388) Airbus A380-861 Registration(71BE13) HL7613 Altitude 36,000 ft Vertical Speed 0 fpm Speed 474 kt Track 250° Latitude 83.13 Longitude -178.5488 Radar T-FAA3 Squawk N/A

DL159 / DAL159 Delta Air Lines DTW Detroit ICN Seoul STD 3:38 PM EDT ATD 3:54 PM EDT STA 6:10 PM KST ETA 4:55 PM KST Aircraft(B744) Boeing 747-451 Registration(A8DD8B) N670US Altitude 32,000 ft Vertical Speed 0 fpm Speed 501 kt Track 270° Latitude 79.0877 Longitude -162.0817 Radar T-FAA3 Squawk N/A

CX831 / CPA831 Cathay Pacific JFK New York HKG Hong Kong STD 2:50 PM EDT ATD 3:36 PM EDT STA 6:50 PM HKT ETA 6:03 PM HKT Aircraft(B77W) Boeing 777-367(ER) Registration(780A39) B-KQG Altitude 32,000 ft Vertical Speed 0 fpm Speed 526 kt Track 270° Latitude 80.8604 Longitude -164.2487 Radar T-FAA2 Squawk N/A

UA117 / UAL117 United Airlines EWR New York HKG Hong Kong STD 3:10 PM EDT ATD 3:25 PM EDT STA 7:10 PM HKT ETA 6:18 PM HKT Aircraft(B772) Boeing 777-224(ER) Registration(A2A915) N27015 Altitude 34,000 ft Vertical Speed 0 fpm Speed 510 kt Track 270° Latitude 80.9038 Longitude -162.0279 Radar T-FAA2 Squawk N/A

CA818 / CCA818 Air China IAD Washington PEK Beijing STD 4:35 PM EDT ATD 4:38 PM EDT STA 6:15 PM CST ETA 5:16 PM CST Aircraft(B77W) Boeing 777-39L(ER) Registration(780BF6) B-2045 Altitude 32,000 ft Vertical Speed 0 fpm Speed 497 kt Track 270° Latitude 78.0321 Longitude -165.1193 Radar T-FAA3 Squawk N/A

Also AAL289, KAL36, KAL82, AAL137, DAL275, EAL895, UAL835, CES588, CCA982, CSN432 may have been polar, but I lost track of them. 86.157.57.26 (talk) 03:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I'm dropping you this notice as you've indicated at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane that you are interested in attending a Wiki meetup in Brisbane. Assuming significant interest, I'm organising an event for August 22 at the SLQ Café in South Brisbane, and we'd love for you to come along. A list of people interested in coming, and a discussion space has been created at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/8. Hope to see you there! Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:00, 4 August 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Chris, a community liaison in the Discovery department at the Wikimedia Foundation. One of the projects we’re working on is to bring interactive maps to Wikipedia. If you are interested, I’d like to have an informal conversation with you about your work with WikiProject Maps, and the conventions you all have created. I'd like to learn more about your work and how that might influence the design of interactive maps.

Please let me know of some good times to chat via email and I can setup a meeting for us. I can be reached at ckoernerwikimedia.org.

If you’re not interested, that’s fine. I would appreciate any direction to other editors that have been involved and might be interested.

Have a good day, CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 20:45, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Come along! Kerry (talk) 04:03, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	Brisbane Meetup Next: To be decided (watch) Last: Saturday 13 January 2018
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hello, Advanstra. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

If you are in or near Brisbane, please join us on Sunday 10 December 2017 any time from noon to 4pm at The Edge at the State Library of Queensland. For more details and to sign up, please go to the meetup page. See you there! Kerry (talk) 21:56, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Advanstra. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	Brisbane Meetup Next: To be decided (watch) Last: Saturday 13 January 2018
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

If you are in or near Brisbane, please join us on Saturday 13 January 2018 any time from noon to 4pm at The Edge at the State Library of Queensland. For more details and to sign up, please go to the meetup page. See you there! Kerry (talk) 00:51, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Advanstra. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Advanstra. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Northbound 195.202.44.90 (talk) 14:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]