Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

User talk:AB1606

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugo Ortega (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 17:59, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, AB1606! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 17:59, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugo Ortega (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This articles reads like a Linkedin CV.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 08:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugo Ortega (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See WP:COI. All statements need to be sourced, starting with the date of birth.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 21:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugo Ortega (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Modussiccandi was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Feedback from previous reviewers has not been fully taken on board. The section on early life doesn't have a single source. Unsourced statements sprinkled in throughout.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Modussiccandi (talk) 21:00, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugo Ortega (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GraziePrego was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Add some citations to the Awards and Accolades (and remove unsourced ones) and this article is good to go in my opinion. Great to see how much it's improved.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
GraziePrego (talk) 11:53, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugo Ortega (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The entire award section is promotional. The first award is for his restaurant, not him. The rest seem to be local awards or no award at all. I am also on the fence for notability purposes as the references all seem to be local.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 19:48, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugo Ortega (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Current Restaurants and Bibliography sections have cleanup tags requiring sources not yet addressed. Further: in my opinion, still promotional and not NPOV and fails notability, but I will reserve judgement on those as they are address by previous reviewers.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MicrobiologyMarcus (petri dish•cultures) 16:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugo Ortega (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GraziePrego was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Some errors for referencing restaurants, eg Mi Almita, James Beard House in New York City etc etc Convert these from bluelinks-to-websites to proper citations.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
GraziePrego (talk) 02:55, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest?

Please disclose your connection to Hugo Ortega/his restaurants per WP:COI. Valereee (talk) 20:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am a contracted writer of Hugo's publicist AB1606 (talk) 16:21, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugo Ortega has been accepted

Hugo Ortega, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 01:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:AB1606