Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (96.36.68.29) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 01:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding this section to my talk page. I consider it spam, since it has nothing to do with editing Wikipedia. Thank you. — Gorthian (talk) 05:06, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Political appointments of Donald Trump, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Political appointments of Donald Trump shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Arjayay (talk) 18:24, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I guy is takeing away my edits tell him the same thing please and thank you.

Hi,

I appreciate that you took the time to leave a message on my talk page and I'm sorry that I hadn't done that beforehand in order to avoid some unneccesary conflict. Yes, I am one of the people who has been removing your edits on this page. Regardless of whether this is intentional or not, you have repeatedly removed constructive edits from the article, including the additions of sourced candidates for positions like Secretary of the Army. I've deleted Allen West from the list of candidates because I am unable to find any news articles or sources that mention him as a possible pick for the position. If you can find one, feel free to put it on my talk page and I'll be happy to add him to the list.

In the meantime, please remember that anyone you add to the article needs to have a source listed next to their name, and be careful not to accidentally remove other edits from the page.

Thanks,

Awesome335 (talk) 18:55, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you so much. Friend.

You posted a very weird message. I could not read it, so if you want people to read your messages you should make them phonetically correct.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:33, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:11, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:52, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Michigan gubernatorial election, 2018. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, 96.36.68.29. You have new messages at Uptoniga's talk page.
Message added 02:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Uptoniga (talk) 02:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:36, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop attempting to add junior staffers to the list of senior staff on the White House Office page. (1) The list is for senior leadership and department heads. (2) You have cited no resources to prove that these people are even White House employees. (3) I'm reporting this behavior for edit warring. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.132.212.103 (talk) 18:51, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please stop edit warring and start participating in the discussion at Talk:White House Office. Thanks. El_C 19:26, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 96.36.68.29. You were reported for edit warring at White House Office. After the report was closed by an administrator (User:El_C), you have continued to revert. You've never used the talk page to discuss your changes. If this continues, you are risking a block. The most serious problem is that you haven't given any sources to show that these people work for the White House. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:19, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I put my resource on the user who is trying to block me talk page.

It's better if you place it on the article talk page, so others can participate. Also, please sign your name when you comment. El_C 02:59, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:07, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 2601:188:1:AEA0:499A:CAE2:CE97:E464. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:499A:CAE2:CE97:E464 (talk) 21:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Warren Consolidated Schools has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. 2601:188:1:AEA0:499A:CAE2:CE97:E464 (talk) 21:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Gary Cohn (investment banker), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:51, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 96.36.68.29. You have new messages at Joseph A. Spadaro's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, 96.36.68.29. You have new messages at Joseph A. Spadaro's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of law schools attended by United States Supreme Court Justices. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Columbia University is not Columbia School of Law (and is not a law school). General Ization ^Talk 21:00, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of law schools attended by United States Supreme Court Justices, you may be blocked from editing. Columbia University is not Columbia School of Law (and is not a law school). General Ization ^Talk 21:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The BA degree that Gorsuch received was not a degree from the Columbia Law School. Gorsuch graduated cum laude from Columbia College, an undergraduate school, in three years with a bachelor of arts in political science.[1], and a degree in political science is not a law degree. Columbia College is not a law school. Columbia College is also not Columbia Law School, which is a graduate school. They are different schools within the Columbia University system. Gorsuch did not attend Columbia Law School. Please stop editing the article to say that he did. General Ization ^Talk 21:22, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at List of law schools attended by United States Supreme Court Justices. General Ization ^Talk 21:24, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You can't blank out Columbia Law School from the List of law schools attended by the U.S. Supreme Court justices.Bjhillis (talk) 21:36, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 96.36.68.29. You have new messages at LacrimosaDiesIlla's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, 96.36.68.29. You have new messages at LacrimosaDiesIlla's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, 96.36.68.29. You have new messages at LacrimosaDiesIlla's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

• Sorry ignore my roll back that was an accident D: --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 20:45, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please help me get unblock please KrakatoaKatie undid the work I helped did with you,

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for continued removal of material. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Katie^talk 22:17, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Why did you block me KrakatoaKatie?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

96.36.68.29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Another user and I are trying to improve the page and KrakatoaKatie undid the work I did for my part so KrakatoaKatie should be block. 96.36.68.29 (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

This seems to have been a mistake. It would have helped see what you did, though, if you had used edit summaries; with edits such as this one in between it wasn't quite clear that you were merely moving the Obama holdouts into the relevant section. Huon (talk) 23:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:57, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 96.36.68.29. You have new messages at LacrimosaDiesIlla's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

LacrimosaDiesIlla (talk) 15:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Political appointments by Donald Trump shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 02:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

• I think you should be very careful with reverting in that article. Very careful. And it is no use pretending there is some sort of consensus on the talk page. Drmies (talk) 15:02, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:11, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have to upload the files to Wikipedia FIRST. You have to actually create the image files. THEN you can add links in the article to the files. You CANNOT directly add photos to the article by typing in file names unless those files exist on Wikipedia. LacrimosaDiesIlla (talk) 18:47, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you have images you would like to upload to Wikipedia, please visit WP:UPI and learn how to do that there. Then, once you have uploaded the images, you can use them in articles. LacrimosaDiesIlla (talk) 18:48, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:03, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kid Rock has teased us and backtracked on the media. So until he makes it official by filing as a candidate, Kid Rock is NOT a candidate for the U.S. Senate. [2] Steelbeard1 (talk) 20:10, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 96.36.68.29. You have new messages at LacrimosaDiesIlla's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, 96.36.68.29. You have new messages at LacrimosaDiesIlla's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Also, seriously learn how to sign your posts on talk pages. All you have to do is type four tildes (the thing that looks like this: ~). LacrimosaDiesIlla (talk) 18:58, 18 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, 96.36.68.29. You have new messages at LacrimosaDiesIlla's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You need to learn how to sign your posts on talk pages or I'm going to stop responding to you. There's even a button below the editing box between the section symbol (§) and the reference markup (<ref></ref>) to insert the four tildes (~~~~). You can just press that at the end of your comment and it'll insert them for you. Or you could find the tilde in the upper left hand corner of your keyboard: you have to hit shift on the ` key. Be a courteous member of the editing community: sign your posts. LacrimosaDiesIlla (talk) 19:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You just forgot to include {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" at the top of the table, and |} at the bottom. Also, colspan=8| needed to be removed from the bottom of the table! Thanks for your hard work! Corky ^{Buzz by the Hornet's Nest} 16:22, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw that at Talk:Political appointments by Donald Trump you opened up a thread named "RfC: Acting officials." FYI, to actually register an official RFC and to have the RFC bot summon commenters, etc., you need to follow the instructions listed here. I'd never opened an RFC before but I recently opened my first one, and it was pretty simple--you just need to add a template, and the instructions I mentioned will tell you how to do so. Let me know if you have any questions, thanks. Marquardtika (talk) 05:26, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scaramucci was NOT Director of the Office of Public Liaison, the appointment got delayed and he was ultimately never appointed. Look it up. Reuters reported he did not get the director role. Seems to me you have flimsy sources. Blakebs (talk) 8:23PM November 17, 2017 (CST)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sterling Heights, Michigan has been reverted.
Your edit here to Sterling Heights, Michigan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ur5BVf-b-0g) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

I put it back as a reference. It is not WP:Spam and is not a WP:Copyright violation. Bots are sometimes wrong. GIGO! Less like to draw fire if it is a properly cited and formatted reference, instead of a bare url as an EXTERNAL LINK. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So, you have pictures for me? - User:Blakebs (Blakebs)

Yes I do I just sent you the pictures.96.36.68.29 (talk) 02:03, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Holdovers from previous administrations in the Trump administration— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:01, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks.96.36.68.29 (talk) 17:05, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Mike Pompeo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You don't have consensus. Discuss on talk page. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi Chris it's not an edit war Bbb23 undid my work first why am i being worned and not Bbb23? And I found my mistake earlyer and plus you just undid my work. so you should be warned.96.36.68.29 (talk) 23:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please warn me on my talk page. It'll be funny. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chris it's not an edit war Bbb23 undid my work first why am i being worned and not Bbb23? And I found my mistake earlyer And I watched the vote on C-SPAN And here on what it say Senate Foreign Relations Committee Meeting on Mike Pompeo Nomination The Senate Foreign Relations Committee held a meeting to vote on the president’s secretary of State nominee, current CIA Director Mike Pompeo. The Committee initially voted 11-10 to support the nomination. However, Senator Isakson’s (R-GA) vote was by proxy and by Senate rules could not be used to move a nomination to the floor. After some discussion, Senator Coons (D-DE), who opposed the nomination was recorded as voting no, voted present to allow the nomination to go forward by a vote of 10-9. https://www.c-span.org/video/?444353-1/committee-votes-send-pompeo-nomination-senate-floor Thanks.96.36.68.29 (talk) 23:53, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't doubt what you're asserting is true. The point here is that I don't care. Per WP:NOTNEWS, Wikipedia is not a running tally of stuff the happened. You were bold and I reverted you. Per WP:BRD, it's time to discuss the matter on the talk page not edit war over it. I indicated in my initial warning that you did not have consensus to add that table. Please make your case on the article's talk page and we'll hear you out. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:05, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of people from Grand Rapids, Michigan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 03:42, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically Political appointments by Donald Trump, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:11, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

We all due respect, but you're an anonymous IP address who can't even be bothered to register a proper account and I don't take orders from you. You bring nothing but confusion to Political appointments by Donald Trump. You insisted Anthony Scaramucci was part of the administration prior to becoming Communications Director, he was not. I told you over and over his appointment was stalled and ultimately never happened. You kept insisting otherwise and never admitted you were wrong. Never took responsibility for the fact you were wrong. I don't believe you called the White House. I don't believe you have sources for any of your claims. I have financial disclosures that state otherwise. Until a full list of the senior staff members who were sworn in January 22 is provided, it stays as is. What you think Trump and Pence just stood there and stared at each other after the inauguration? I'm tired of you correcting me. I'm an established editor, you're an anonymous stranger who doesn't know what he's doing. Blakebs (talk) 07:14, 09 June 2018 (CST)

Look I been following President Trump on day on June 16th 2015 and I saw the right afther He won I followed the Great Again Website He put out a Press Releace about Anthony Scaramucci being part of the administration prior to becoming Communications Director, he was. for like 9 days. Plus I voted for President Trump.96.36.68.29 (talk) 03:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to find the press releace.96.36.68.29 (talk) 03:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

TonyBallioni (talk) 15:53, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. "I called epa" is absolutely unacceptable as a source; it's not published and not independently verifiable. —C.Fred (talk) 14:36, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

C.Fred I really talked to Administrator Scott Pruitt today he told me he is leaving the 9th on Monday like in this sorce say https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/05/climate/scott-pruitt-epa-trump.html Qote: (agency’s deputy, Andrew Wheeler, a former coal lobbyist, would take over as the acting administrator on Monday.) so he would have to bref him on the Job and make his goodbye speech to epa staff. Thanks and I look foward for your reply.96.36.68.29 (talk) 14:51, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hrm. The Times says the resignation is effective Monday. The Vox article currently cited says the acting administrator takes over on Monday. I'm seeing published sources that say the change happens Monday. —C.Fred (talk) 14:56, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ya that's what I am talking about he leaves on Monday the 9th. not today the 6th.96.36.68.29 (talk) 15:01, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the important thing: the statement can be backed up by published reliable sources. I did change both articles, but based on what Vox and the NYT have published; your (alleged) phone call had zero weight in my decision. —C.Fred (talk) 15:04, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Physician to the President have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 14:10, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Robert Wilkie, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 14:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Check the page Sean Conley. Regards Denisarona (talk) 14:35, 19 August 2018 (UTC) Hi Denisarona Sean Conley is Acting Physician to the President here is a Refrence I found https://thedo.osteopathic.org/2018/05/navy-veteran-do-is-serving-as-president-donald-trumps-physician/ And as you can see on the Physician to the President page All of the White House physicians have a Refrence and This one Refrence I found should be at Sean Conley Thank you and I look forward for your Responce And Ms. Stephanie Barna is the Acting Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness https://prhome.defense.gov/Leadership/ For the Robert Wilkie page.96.36.68.29 (talk) 14:39, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Political appointments by Donald Trump, you may be blocked from editing. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 04:14, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks.96.36.68.29 (talk) 04:32, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Daffy123 here. You keep reverting my edits, saying that you need to 'chop the pics' which i assume means crop the pics. The photo of Richard Clarida is small already and honest to god I don't know how you would crop it even more. I thank you for adding that photo on Clardia's page but please explain what you mean by trying to 'chop the pic' that is already small. --Daffy123 (talk) 15:45, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Daffy123: They mean cropping the pix. The image, like you said, was too small to even crop. I have uploaded the larger version of the image and have cropped it. Corky 18:22, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Nikki Haley shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Strikerforce^Talk 14:43, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:96.36.68.29 reported by User:Strikerforce (Result: ). Thank you. Strikerforce^Talk 14:49, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strikerforce please look at the Nikki Haley page people always jump to counclusion talk to user Corkythehornetfan. He will tell you we get this all the time. Please All the Faxs are not in the story about ‎ Nikki Haley is still update ing please put a lock on Nikki Haley please tell users to wait till President Trump is done speeking about it.

Be all of that as it may, you were still edit warring. Strikerforce^Talk 14:58, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please Strikerforce I love editing Goverment stuff please. Can you do anything about it?96.36.68.29 (talk) 15:01, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're asking me to do. You were edit warring. You have been warned in the past about edit warring (including rather recently). The warnings apparently did nothing to make you change your editing habits, as they pertain to edit warring. Therefore, I filed the AN/3 report. I'll leave it to an administrator to handle from there. Strikerforce^Talk 15:04, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't I tell you off months ago? Quit bothering me with your stupid pictures to add, quit scolding me, I DO NOT WANT TO CROP ANYTHING, DO IT YOURSELF! You obviously know nothing of Wikipedia's rules as you've linked me to images that are not fair-use and as such not permitted in the past. You are an anonymous user and I don't feel as though I have to defer to you on anything. I'm tired of you telling me what to do. Do not message me again. You're semi-literate and know nothing of the rules of Wikipedia. - Blakebs

To upload a picture to Wikipedia, you first need to upload a picture to Wikimedia Commons. Go to Wikimedia Commons and then go to a link on the left side called "Upload File". It'll tell you what's allowed and not. The "Commons:Help Desk" can explain technical and legal questions.

I hope this helps, Skim

It's actually a bit more complicated than that. If it is a free image, then it can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.

If the image is not free, however, then it has to be uploaded to the English Wikipedia, and it is subject to our non-free content criteria. —C.Fred (talk) 19:05, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.96.36.68.29 (talk) 22:40, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bbb23 Please I know you hate me. Why do you hate me why? If I provide my email address can you please email me and I can tell you why I like to edit on Wikipedia? Just hear me out just this once.96.36.68.29 (talk) 23:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]