Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 15:56, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome! --84.132.144.110 (talk) 15:57, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Oberkassel, Bonn, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 03:32, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Oberkassel, Bonn. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Adakiko reverted you and exained what the issue was, to just revert them without explanation is disruptive. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 04:44, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bullshit. I did what Adakiko requested.

Whatever, not my problem now. --84.132.144.110 (talk) 06:02, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Jon Batiste shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ss112 21:28, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neither myself nor Gagaluv removed a "chart posting" (I think you mean chart position) without justification, nor did we "pretend" to do something else. As I just said, Canada is a bigger music market (by annual revenue, and because there are significantly many more people living in Canada) than the Wallonia region of Belgium. We should have a maximum of 10 columns in any discography table, so we can't exceed 10 here. 81 in Canada is higher and more significant than 175 in one region of Belgium. Ss112 21:32, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Of course you did. You replaced it, you did not offer a justification, so from what I know about the English language, you replaced it without justification. Possibly you had something in your head, but we can't know that unless you use the edit box.

Second, you fudged the number of a top chart position while doing the unjustified chart switch. So again, you should probably let us know what you do instead of hiding the change of a number in an edit like this. --84.132.144.110 (talk) 21:52, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]