This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:When to use or avoid "other stuff exists" arguments, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —El Millo (talk) 16:47, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Glasgow effect—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Isabelle ^🔔 22:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ... discospinster _talk 22:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

@Discospinster: Why are you challenging the expressed wisdom of JJMC89? His thorouhgoing ruthlessness and lack of humility and sensitivity clearly speak of his total infallibility at all times. Supporting your position with "other stuff" isn't going to work. 77.97.241.12 (talk) 22:59, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:When to use or avoid "other stuff exists" arguments, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —El Millo (talk) 16:04, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]