Hello! I'm Heythereimaguy. Your recent edit(s) to the page Tom Henderson (basketball) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Heythereimaguy (talk) 16:10, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2024–25 Los Angeles Lakers season, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 09:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• This warning was the result of a false positive.

Nixovel (talk) 11:27, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was not engaging in disruptive editing, I was simply fixing up stuff following the recent creation of new categories that were implemented recently. The San Diego Conquistadors expansion draft picks category was specifically created due to players being drafted by that team only during the 1972 ABA expansion draft period of time, as noted by multiple sources citing the 1972 ABA Draft year in question within the American Basketball Association draft page. I apologize if my recent edits stirred up a false positive at hand, but please let it be known right out of the gate going forward that with these recent edits at hand that anything done there relate primarily fixing up an issue that previously existed due to a category (or two) not being around at the time that was recently created now, hence my recent edits in question. Hopefully that helps clear things up here going forward. (If I have to use a link by someone else to help prove the point as well in my edits to show I'm not doing malicious edits here, so be it. I'm willing to showcase anything to prove my edits aren't being malicious in any way here. And yes, I'm on a shared computer, just so we're perfectly transparent here.) 70.162.127.129 (talk) 11:35, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for this error. Because of the frequent reverts on the page, it appeared that you were participating in an edit war. It is an unfortunate consequence of how Wikipedia categories edits. Again, I apologise for the error. Nixovel (talk) 11:38, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay, my good man. Just please let that be known by other moderators and admins here for future reference in this case. 70.162.127.129 (talk) 11:40, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do suggest that you remove the manual revert tag to avoid future incidents Nixovel (talk) 11:43, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know, then. 70.162.127.129 (talk) 11:43, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at American Football League, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mr. Faye Rogahn (talk) 15:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference, reversion is only to be used to undo errors, and is not to be used to undo edits that were correct at the time but circumstances have changed. For example, if I remove a redlinked category from a page because it doesn't exist at that time to be on pages, and then the category does get created a week later, then you must readd the category to each relevant page as a new edit rather than as a reversion of my edit — because my edit was a necessary and required piece of routine cleanup, I did not deserve to log in this morning and immediately be slapped across the face with 48 "your edit has been reverted" notices. You use revert when somebody does wrong things to articles, like inserting vandalism or nonsense, not when somebody does things that were correct at the time they were done. Bearcat (talk) 15:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know that now thanks to talks with Nixovel. That being said, I apologize for that and will keep that information in mind for future references. 70.162.127.129 (talk) 20:22, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IP 70.162.127.129. I've posted another response to your question about Marvin Barnes' photo at WP:MCQ and am just letting you know as a courtesy. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:23, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]