Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (67.81.107.101) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 20:18, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bebop and Rocksteady has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 01:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Here Comes Honey Boo Boo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. ProgrammingGeek (Page! • Talk! • Contribs!) 20:45, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. –Matthew - (talk) 01:09, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi there, these edits [1][2] are not constructive. If another editor has left a constructive comment in good faith, you can either choose to respond to it, or choose to ignore it. If you've already responded to the discussion elsewhere on the page, a simple, "I've responded to these points above"-style note would be sufficient. Removing the entire comment looks an awful lot like you're just doing it to be irritating to the other user.

And while we're discussing irritating behavior, this is a community editing project. Civility is one of the five pillars of Wikipedia and any incivil comments like calling another user "fuck face" is as inappropriate here as it would be anywhere else. If you have trouble interacting well with people, editing at Wikipedia isn't the best hobby for you. Comment on content, not on the contributor.

Lastly, if content you submit has been rejected by another editor, the burden is yours to open a discussion to seek consensus, not to revert the reversion. Discussions should take place on the article's talk page, not in edit summaries. The earlier version of the content should remain until consensus is achieved for the change you want. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:54, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jimmy Olsen. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not edit war with other users regarding the controverted revision that you made to this page. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page instead. Thank you. BlAcKhAt9(9 (talk) 18:02, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism, as you did at Deadly Towers. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 12:09, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Superchunk22. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Deadly Towers have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Superchunk22 (talk) 00:36, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For [3]. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Butters Stotch have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 16:10, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Septrillion. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Reptile have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Septrillion (talk) 04:34, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Zilla (TriStar Godzilla). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:20, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Godbeast Megazord: Return of Green Dragon— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:07, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tsuburaya Productions. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dorsetonian (talk) 23:11, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:17, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tsuburaya Productions, you may be blocked from editing. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 16:17, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ultraman (character). Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 16:17, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 months for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 16:18, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ultraman (character), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 03:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ultra Series. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 04:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anti-British sentiment. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrSwagger21 (talk) 19:58, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Frozen. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Diaper—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 03:24, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Frozen. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Count Dracula—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 02:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Count Dracula—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Isabelle ^🔔 00:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 01:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll stop vandalizing now.--67.81.107.101 (talk) 01:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]