Sorry to revert your change on List of political parties in the United States but the Keystone Party of Pennsylvania has ballot access per this article

https://www.witf.org/2022/08/01/third-party-candidates-file-to-run-for-pa-governor-senate/

Scu ba (talk) 00:40, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Scu ba: You are incorrect. Ballot access for the party means that they can place candidates on the ballot without having to collect signatures. They had to collect signatures for each candidate. Only the Republicans and Democrats have this in Pennsylvania. 15% of voters registered with the party is required. 25stargeneral (talk) 00:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@25stargeneral I see, sorry I misunderstood that. Thanks for clarifying! Scu ba (talk) 00:47, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you with this, but I looked at usages of File:Forms of government 2021.svg, used in several WP articles and where you are listed as the most recent editor of the image file, and the usages I looked at are missing the legend. I see that the {{Legend}} template needs specific colors to be identified and I am unsure of that info from looking at the Legend as rendered on the image page. Do you know how I could find out what specific colors are used in the image and in the Legend section of the image file page? Do you know what the customary method of creating image-specific legends for images with multiple appearances is in WP (maybe create a wrapper template using the image file name)? I probably knew that at one time but, if I did, I've forgotten it. Thanks for any help. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. Maybe you & @Steven Walling: can work out a compromise, concerning the four uncalled US state (Oregon, Alaska, Arizona, Nevada) governor races & whether or not to 'bold' leading votes/percentage. GoodDay (talk) 01:52, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping. IMO the purpose of the bolding is clarity for readers by making the infoboxes easier to scan. Even when races are still underway, quickly showing who is in the lead is helpful. Steven Walling • talk 02:00, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be better to put 2024 underneath the Post-presidency (2021–present) section where it was originally was? The articles events seem to run in chronological order with the 2024 presidental campaign now in the middle and all of Trumps presidency and his policies now underneath it. Aaron106 (talk) 02:46, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what to think about that. I'd ask at the article talk page. 25stargeneral (talk) 02:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok --Aaron106 (talk) 02:48, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Linking "Chairman" to "President of Yemen" implies that they are the same. You may not think it is a big deal, but then, what was wrong with my edit? All it did was clarify. Also, the "Disputed by Mahdi al-Mashat" footnote makes it sound like al-Mashat claims to be the chairman of the PLC, which is not true. Kornatice (talk) 03:32, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kornatice. In the future, when you have a content issue, be sure to use the article talk page. The Chairman of the PLC is indeed referred to by many sources as being essentially the same as the president, and he does carry out all the functions of the head of state. The PLC was created as a concession to warring factions but the other members have little power. Mahdi al-Mashat does claim to be the head of state of Yemen. I will add (Supreme Political Council) to clarify, just as it is in the footer. 25stargeneral (talk) 03:35, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That may be the case, but formally, the Presidential Leadership Council as a whole is the presidency. Whether or not al-Alimi holds most of the power is irrelevant because legally, he is not president. My clarification made this clear.

Seperately, adding the "(Supreme Political Council)" to the infobox note is a good solution to that issue. Kornatice (talk) 03:42, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we're not saying he is the president. It says "Chairman", we're just talking about a piped link to the President of Yemen article, which has been reworked slightly to say that the PLC has the powers of the president, but its chairman is the head of state. What matters is that the chairman is the head of state, and that's the correct article for the head of state. It isn't worth renaming the article because it's just a temporary structure. You will see on Yemeni government websites that even they treat it this way [1]. 25stargeneral (talk) 03:51, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't dispute that he is "head of state", only that he is "president". And I certainly don't propose renaming the "President of Yemen" article or anything like that, although it should clarify that al-Alimi is not the holder of that office, but the chairman of a body that exercises its powers, at least officially. As for al-Alimi's article, why should "chairman" link to president when it is easy enough to add a clarifying sentence that explains their relationship?

Your Yemeni government website is interesting, because it refers to him as both "The President", and, right next to that, the "President of the Presidential Leadership Council". It does seem to recognize a difference. Kornatice (talk) 03:59, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The biographical article is not really the place to explain the government structure. That's outside the scope. It should be explained on the government articles. I'd suggest adding clarifying language to the President of Yemen article noting that while the chairman is the head of state (what the article and infobox are ultimately about), executive power is shared by either the PLC or the SPC, depending on which government you're talking about. As for the bio article, we should be able to have a simple link to the head of state article where all this is explained. 25stargeneral (talk) 04:01, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that is fair enough, but one fragment of a sentence is too much explanation of government structure? Your ideas for the "President of Yemen" article are good, but it is best just to clarify in al-Alimi's article itself. At least change the link from the word "chairman" from "President of Yemen" to "List of heads of state of Yemen". Kornatice (talk) 04:08, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So what we have here is a choice between a few options:

Option 1: Link "chairman" to the article "President of Yemen" in both the infobox and lead. (your preference)

Option 2: Do not link either instance of "chairman", and append a short note explaining the relationship between al-Alimi's office and the presidency. (my preference)

Option 1 is not acceptable because the chairmanship of the Presidential Leadership Council is not the presidency. Formally, the PLC is the presidency. It would make more sense to link "Presidential Leadership Council" to "President of Yemen" than it does to link "chairman" to that page. You say that linking "chairman" to "President of Yemen" does not imply they are the same, but it does. You also say that the "President of Yemen" article is the article for the head of state of Yemen, regardless of title. That is not true; if that was the case, why would articles like "Imams of Yemen" exist separately? They were heads of state too.

Your argument against Option 2 was that al-Alimi's article is not the place to explain government structure, and that even my short explanation was too much. While I do not agree, if you insist upon this point I will agree to the following, additional solution:

Option 3: Do not link either instance of "chairman", and do not add any note.

After all, there's no reason why al-Alimi's article has to have a link to "President of Yemen" anyway, since he is not the holder of that office. It is better to have no link than one that is misleading.

So, what are your thoughts on these options? Do you have any additional arguments? Do you still object to Option 2? Do you object to Option 3? Kornatice (talk) 06:24, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Emblem of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 185.172.241.184 (talk) 06:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geoff Neale, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoff Neale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't dispute calling the gov't totalitarian. I made that edit to separate two issues (ethnic/religious demographics and calling the gov't totalitarian). The demographic questions have been an issue of contention, and were finally resolved after a couple RFCs (see talk at Demographics of Eritrea for some context), and I really didn't want to wade back into all that by getting it tangled up with an entirely separate question of whether the article should call Eritrea totalitarian in wikivoice. Hence my first edit to restore consensus around demographics, and then my second to not revert the edit removing the totalitarian description. I have no intention of reverting your edit. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 16:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Whitney Bilyeu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitney Bilyeu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sal2100 (talk) 16:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UN ceased to recognize Ashraf Ghani in January 2022 but not Rabbani in 1996/2001. Panam2014 (talk) 04:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: Okay? I still don't get what you were trying to say. UN recognize any government as legitimate. is a grammatically incoherent sentence, and was also unsourced. 25stargeneral (talk) 04:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[2] Panam2014 (talk) 04:32, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please use your words. What were you trying to say with that sentence you added? 25stargeneral (talk) 04:32, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UN recognize any head of state for Afghanistan. Panam2014 (talk) 04:34, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This sentence does not make sense. I'm sorry, but if you can't write in English clearly than I won't be able to understand you. 25stargeneral (talk) 04:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For UN, Afghanistan has no Head of state. Panam2014 (talk) 04:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. I think that is already covered by the third paragraph of the lead. 25stargeneral (talk) 04:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Natalia Gavrilița is still PM until new government is sworn in. Panam2014 (talk) 04:34, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently been editing the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes) which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 20:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

South Korean’s intelligence says she is 10-11 Coolcat9000 (talk) 02:17, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Coolcat9000: As you were previously warned, you have to provide reliable sources whenever you edit. We can't take the word of a random person on the internet, especially when there already are sources saying something else. 25stargeneral (talk) 02:18, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @25stargeneral, I appreciate that you appear to have a passion for the subject at hand at the article referred to above, and I recognise that you edit in good faith (although I think you may possibly have developed a partiality in respect of the subject at hand), but I ask you respectfully and in the spirit of collegiality not to be rude or leave messages for me which could be construed as bullying. My edits to that article have been, like all my others, done in good faith and certainly improve the article. I have taken some time and efort to ensure this. I have discussed most edits in advance and on the odd occasion I have not with a small edit I have made it clear that WP:BRD applies. You and any other editor are at liberty to revert. There is literaly no question of edit-warring. If you feel it appropriate, you may follow on as per WP edit warring guidance; and indeed any other guidance you may feel relevant. In the meantime, the article Talk page is not the place for such as discussion and I do not wish to enter further into the subject. I may continue to make small improvements to the article, notably to remove what seems to me to be occasional political bias. All the best, Emmentalist (talk) 12:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:2021–2023_Myanmar_protests#Requested_move_26_February_2023 --- Tbf69 P • T 18:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi '25stargeneral'. It seems that you're editing on a number of topics that are of interest to the US State Department. You also openly identify yourself on your bio page as in support of one of the USA's foreign imperial projects. Can I ask if you have any links at all to the US government? 122.150.92.52 (talk) 12:16, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have any links to the US government (not that it's any of your business). I strongly suggest you exercise caution. Implying misconduct without evidence can easily get you blocked, and the next person you do it to may not be so forgiving. 25stargeneral (talk) 01:49, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The exact picture was used when she visited the Italian base in Iraq and it is also used on the Italian page. I believe it can be regarded as an "official portrait". VosleCap (talk) 11:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@VosleCap: Please look at the source. It is not a portrait photograph. It is a still frame taken from a video of her speaking. It is not uncommon for official sources to end up using whatever image we put into a Wikipedia article, that doesn’t mean anything. A Wikipedia editor is the one who created this particular image, by choosing a frame from the video. 25stargeneral (talk) 11:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Myanmar Barnstar of National Merit
		Thank you for your recent contributions to Myanmar-related articles. Your help in updating and creating new content is greatly appreciated. Yue🌙 03:42, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yue: Thank you, much appreciated! 25stargeneral (talk) 03:43, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as no headway will realistically be made, I have opened up a dispute resolution form.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#2024_Libertarian_Party_presidential_primaries Dieselkeough (talk) 03:44, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give 2023 Sudanese Armed Forces-Rapid Support Forces confrontation a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into 2023 Sudan clashes. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Panam2014 (talk) 10:51, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was a merge, not a move. 25stargeneral (talk) 14:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Why are you move warring, twice, 2023 Sudan clashes over 2023 Sudanese clashes? Both L'Mainerque and TankDude2000 have provided similar reasoning—Demonym and All of the other wars involving Sudan on wikipedia have “Sudanese” instead “Sudan”. For example: First Sudanese Civil War, Second Sudanese Civil War, respectively—which your reply does not address.

That reply, rather, seems to consist of: This was already discussed and is incorrect. Please don't move without further discussion. Well, where is that previous discussion? Why was it not linked in the summary, then, if it indeed exists as such? This falls short and is sanctionable behaviour. If applicable, please reflect on the essay Wikipedia:Don't revert due solely to "no consensus" and act on the basis substantive reasoning only (i.e. ones that are responsive to the points that actually being raised, rather than deferring elsewhere, somewhere, etc.). Thanks. El_C 02:57, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:2023 Sudan clashes#Move reversion. I discussed it with L’Mainerque and they agree with me now. Thanks for the warning, I will be more careful. 25stargeneral (talk) 03:03, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I thought maybe it was Talk:2023 Sudan clashes#Requested move 15 April 2023, which you yourself closed. But it seemed somewhat unrelated. About that, though: please use don't use atop/abot for RM closes — use RM top/RM bottom + RMnac. Personally, TankDude2000's argument seems most intuitive, but English isn't my native tongue, so who knows. El_C 03:16, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

What does it means? Panam2014 (talk) 12:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What are you referring to? 25stargeneral (talk) 21:52, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 25stargeneral, I work for the BeiGene pharmaceuticals company and have a disclosed COI. I noticed that you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine, and based on that, I am hoping you would take a look at my edit request on BeiGene's Talk page. If you agree that my request improves the page, I would appreciate your help in implementing the changes. Thank you! LexBGNE (talk) 20:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello I wanted to ask if you could help me review this picture, He was nominated to delete the discussion. These two photos are from the same source as a photo you reviewed earlier. File:HM King Charles III HM The Queen Consort.jpg HM King Charles III HM The Queen Consort (cropped) (cropped).jpg 2401:E180:8893:18A9:C1BC:6694:7685:2E4A (talk) 08:20, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Issue 21—June 2023

WikiProject Medicine Newsletter

Hello all. Another irregular edition of the newsletter; pardon the six-month gap. I was inspired to collect this after seeing how much activity there is in the GA space on the medicine front. Please review a GAN if you have time, and help to welcome more medicine editors into the fold:

Recognized content (since January 1!)

Trinidad Arroyo nom. Thebiguglyalien, reviewed by Mike Christie Mycobacterium nom. BluePenguin18, reviewed by Ealdgyth

Nominated for review

Hanhart syndrome nom. Etriusus, under review by Dancing Dollar Persistent stapedial artery nom. X750 Howard Florey nom. Hawkeye7 History of penicillin nom. Hawkeye7 Cataract surgery nom. Pbsouthwood COVID-19 pandemic nom. Ozzie10aaaa, under review by Shibbolethink Mohamed Hamad Satti nom. FuzzyMagma El Hadi Ahmed El Sheikh nom. FuzzyMagma Mansour Ali Haseeb nom. FuzzyMagma Sinus tarsi syndrome for peer review by Pear1020

WP:MED News

• Wikipedia:Good article reassessment is back in business, with a new process and new coordinators. If you see medicine-related GAs that may no longer meet the GA criteria, feel free to nominate them for attention/reassessment (please, not too many at once, lest we get overwhelmed). I'll incorporate them into the listings above.
• Major depressive disorder, Schizophrenia, and Dengue fever are featured articles that need updating. Feel free to chime in at the talk pages or WT:MED if you have the time/bandwidth to help update. They'll likely go to featured article review for more feedback in the near(ish) future (probably in the order listed).

Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome here.

You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Ajpolino (talk) 04:10, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Do you have sources about when Talibn took over websites? Panam2014 (talk) 01:20, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Election box 2nd round no party no change has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:44, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thailand now has a new government established. The previous Prime Minister also resigned from politics. Many academics believe that Thailand has ended its semi-democracy. อย่ามาตบะ (talk) 03:10, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MOD Afghanistan emblem.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

2021 Myanmar coup d'état

added a link pointing to Al Jazeera

Myanmar protests (2021–present)

added a link pointing to Al Jazeera

Myint Swe

added a link pointing to Al Jazeera

Next Myanmar general election

added a link pointing to Al Jazeera

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I have a question before I do any edits to Min Aung Hlaing, I must ask you whether the edit is acceptable, appropriate and approved or not. I have a idea about adding "His Excellency" honorific prefix in his template article in the beginning of his introduction. I want to know whether this is accepted or not. Also another question, "He additionally appointed himself Prime Minister in August 2021. He has led the Tatmadaw (military), an independent branch of government, as the commander-in-chief of Defence Services since March 2011" do you recommend changing Tatmadaw (military) to Tatmadaw (armed forces)? Thank you for the best recommendations. If I have more questions with whether my edits are in line with Wikipedia's Manual of Style guidelines. If I have more questions I will ask here if that's okay with you. Thank you! KhantWiki (talk) 10:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking. You can change military to armed forces if you want. Just remember links and capitalization are meant to be used sparingly and there are guidelines for those. If you have a source for His Excellency you can add that as well. 25stargeneral (talk) 23:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What source should I use for His Excellency? And can I do that without any sources or sources are needed? If so which sources? Thank you for your answer on changing military to armed forces. Also do you recommend adding his List featured on a TIME Magazine, Min Aung Hlaing - The 100 Most Influential People of 2023. "In 2023, Min Aung Hlaing was featured on TIME Magazine's list of the '100 Most Influential People of 2023.' The acknowledgment highlighted his commanding presence during Myanmar’s Armed Forces Day parade on March 27, 2023, emphasizing his control over the nation since the February 2021 coup d'état. Despite recognition of his influence, controversies surround his tenure, including a criticized campaign against pro-democracy rebels and allegations of involvement in significant humanitarian concerns." KhantWiki (talk) 08:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think him being in the TIME 100 is lead-worthy, I'm going to move that further down. Also you did not provide a source for His Excellency so I'm going to remove that. 25stargeneral (talk) 23:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Thank you for your reply. If I have more questions on articles that I would like to improve, I would further ask here. It's better to ask you through here than to do edit without asking on what has to be done on Min Aung Hlaing's article or just anyone. By the way, Is this one accepted as a source for "His Excellency"? https://www.mfaic.gov.kh/posts/2023-08-22-Press-Release-Congratulatory-Message-of-His-Excellency-Senior-General-Min-Aung-Hlaing--Prime-Minister-of-the-Repub-22-43-29

KhantWiki (talk) 10:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now I found a source and provided a source for "His Excellency". Thanks for your clarification. More will be improved by me in the future. KhantWiki (talk) 12:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Issue 22—May 2024

WikiProject Medicine Newsletter

Hello all. Another irregular edition of the newsletter. I was inspired to collect this after seeing several medicine-interested editors nominate their first good article. Please review a GA nomination if you have time, and help support our colleagues' efforts:

Recognized content (since April 1)

National Public Health Laboratory (Sudan) nom. FuzzyMagma, reviewed by Snoteleks Nighat Arif nom. Launchballer, reviewed by Chiswick Chap

Nominated for review

Hepatic hydrothorax nom. Aeschylus Adrenal crisis nom. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath Exhaustion disorder nom. Draken Bowser Bite registration nom. Candle1, under review by Esculenta Charles Wambebe nom. Vanderwaalforces Polio Undergoing featured article review. You can contribute at the FAR page or the article talk page.

WP:MED News

• Wikipedia:Good article reassessment is back in business, with a new process and new coordinators. If you see medicine-related GAs that may no longer meet the GA criteria, feel free to nominate them for attention/reassessment (please, not too many at once, lest we get overwhelmed). I'll incorporate them into the listings above.
• Maintenance category of the month: Articles with topics of unclear notability (I've listed just the 36 that start with "A"; there are 398 total).

  Note for the curious: 24,211 of the 57,554 articles (42%) tagged as part of WP:MED have some maintenance tag.

Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome here.

You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine at 21:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Issue 23—November 2024

WikiProject Medicine Newsletter

Hello all. A short edition to get the newsletter going again. As it says at the bottom, if you have thoughts on how the newsletter could be useful/interesting to you, please post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Newsletter:

Recent recognized content

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome nom. Femke Tumor necrosis factor nom. AdeptLearner123, reviewed by IntentionallyDense Abdominal angina nom. IntentionallyDense, reviewed by Sammi Brie Adrenal crisis nom. IntentionallyDense, reviewed by DoctorWhoFan91 Desquamative interstitial pneumonia nom. IntentionallyDense, reviewed by Nub098765 Neurocysticercosis nom. IntentionallyDense, reviewed by DoctorWhoFan91 Eilish Cleary nom. B3251, reviewed by Actuall7 Owen O'Shiel nom. SkywalkerEccleston, reviewed by IntentionallyDense Oladipo Ogunlesi nom. Ibjaja055, reviewed by Vanderwaalforces Elizabeth Ward (British campaigner) nom. Jonathan Deamer, reviewed by IntentionallyDense Abortion in Sierra Leone nom. Vigilantcosmicpenguin, reviewed by Chipmunkdavis

Nominated for review

Vitamin E nom. David notMD, under review by ChopinChemist Kawa model nom. Significa liberdade Fred Binka nom. Vanderwaalforces Abortion in Zambia nom. Vigilantcosmicpenguin Abortion in the Gambia nom. Vigilantcosmicpenguin Crohn's disease AdeptLearner123 has requested feedback at peer review. Link here.

WP:MED News

• Help WikiProject Unreferenced articles with their November backlog drive by addressing the 130 medicine articles lacking sources.
• Reminder that you can follow medicine-related deletion discussions, GA nominations, merge requests and more by watchlisting Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Article_alerts. Many of these discussions would benefit from more attention.

Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome here.

You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]