Hello, I'm Frood. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Frood (talk!) 02:21, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - Frood (talk!) 02:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Death penalty for homosexuality. bonadea contributions talk 08:22, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

bonadea I did not vandalize, did you look at the sources and see that the New York Times confirms executions occur on occasion. If anything you are WP:BITE and vandalizing for reverting without considering other content that may prove that a source you added may be no longer justified. Don't be offended, this happens to every editor eventually. But committing WP:POINT to prove that you think you're right and reverting instead of talking worries me. Therefore, I will be on the Talk:Death_penalty_for_homosexuality, I expect a WP:CIVIL discussion rather than bullying by instant reverts. Then I will be able to hear what you have to say about these new sources and hopefully have a helpful chat on what you have an issue with. But keep the WP:PA out of this. It is neither correct or appropriate. Thanks and see you there! 194.247.60.2 (talk) 15:04, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

bonadea Please see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Death_penalty_for_homosexuality. Thank you!194.247.60.2 (talk) 16:11, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new here, be kind please :)

Hello, I have no objection to your edits at LGBT rights in the United Arab Emirates, except that you've created a formatting mess in the text. Please see to that. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 20:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC) I need your help, I'm not good at this yet :( 194.247.60.2 (talk) 20:45, 29 January 2020 (UTC) Edit: I have fixed all sources and now even more people are reverting me despite us already agreeing to add the info. Please help me defend these reasonable edits against these pointless reverts. Thanks. 194.247.60.2 (talk) 03:21, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:47, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dan Harmon. Binksternet (talk) 16:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Killing an Arab; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 16:54, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Capital punishment for homosexuality—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:55, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Any commentary that is not sourced will be removed and use of words like allegedly are WP:SPECULATION. 194.247.60.2 (talk)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to LGBT rights in Tanzania—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:04, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to LGBT rights in Russia, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. AntonSamuel (talk) 08:59, 8 May 2020 (UTC)][reply]

Thanks for the report, done. Please report issues with already-blocked users at WP:ANI in the future. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, please see this discussion you're involved in.^[1] 194.247.60.2 (talk)