The (UK) National Health Service - NHS 194.176.105.142 (talk) 13:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Daniel Roche (actor), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Daniel Roche (actor) was changed by 194.176.105.142 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882776 on 2011-10-05T19:27:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:27, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gary Barlow, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Abhijay ^{What did I do this time?} 14:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Disability. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Achowat (talk) 13:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Disability, you may be blocked from editing. Achowat (talk) 13:56, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at X-ray, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pinethicket (talk) 14:52, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Authors under the IP address 194.176.105.142

My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address recently edited an article on Barrett's Osophagus. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please visit my Talk page or e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance. Hydra Rain (talk) 17:05, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Demiurge1000. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Francis Maude, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:26, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to David Cardoza— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your deleted text at KE family. Your claim "the incorrect information that the KE family were of Pakistani origin" is groundless, and on the contrary, reports are explicit in saying they are of Pakistani origin. Start reading the very first citation. What you did was simply vandalism. Chhandama (talk) 02:31, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm VictorSergienko. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your reverts to Java Database Connectivity. Please read the edit's comments, they describe and validate the edits. Particularly, this: http://stackoverflow.com/a/581889/207791, or this: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6083248. I also encourage you not to leave insulting comments. VictorSergienko —Preceding undated comment added 23:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to School of Medicine, University of Manchester, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Musa^Talk ☻ 03:52, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.  Katie^talk 20:48, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Until you retract the legal threat you made on my talk page, this IP address will remain blocked per our policy on legal threats. Katie^talk 20:51, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've reverted your well-intentioned addition to Edith Cavell because the Peterborough hospital is already listed at List of dedications to Edith Cavell. The main page only carries actual memorials, the list of dedications grew to be longer than the article and was moved some time ago to its own page. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 21:02, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bideford A.F.C.. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

When something you add to an article is removed, with a valid reason given or that it was "unsourced" -- i.e., it has no citation from a reliable source so that the information could be verified - then do not' simply stick it back in without fixing the problems. That is called edit warring and it can get you blocked from editing. Eagleash (talk) 13:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

GiantSnowman 17:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.  Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 12:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Schoolboy Q. Binksternet (talk) 20:16, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mozzarella. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Scr★pIron^IV 12:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michika, you may be blocked from editing. Scr★pIron^IV 12:03, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Christianity in Nigeria. - Arjayay (talk) 15:31, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]