Hello 138.162.8.59! You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (138.162.8.59) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
March 2013
Hello, I'm Sodaant. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Lightning because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. SodaAntTalk18:20, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
May 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Johnsonville, South Carolina may have broken the syntax by modifying 6 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
*[[Justin Tunnell (Yeoman 2nd Class Petty Officer U.S. Navy)
Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to History of Mac OS, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Yintan 14:40, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to VP-8 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 11:51, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:138.162.8.59, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jeffrd10 (talk) 15:29, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is a shared IP as is mentioned above and used by a lot of people. Why would I want to create an account? I see how people are treated. I just don't see the point in having all this garbage on this page. 138.162.8.59 (talk) 15:31, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Because it clearly demonstrates the history of totally disruptive editing emanating from this IP and which I why I'll be reinstating it. Leaky Caldron15:33, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Theres only one bad edit for every 20 here so if you want to block it or view that as abuse...whatever. 138.162.8.59 (talk) 15:36, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Oh really, so are you going to block LeakyCauldren too for their bad faith comments about me being a troll? No you aren't, because this isn't about my comments, this is because of who I am and that I am trying to get admins held accountable. You should be ashamed. 138.162.8.59 (talk) 20:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, all I have to do is change my IP, so this really doesn't mean anything. Its just a message to not criticise admins. 138.162.8.59 (talk) 20:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Leaky wasn't making bad faith comments. I think Wikipedia:Our social policies are not a suicide pact is relevant here. I honestly couldn't care why you still spend time on Wikipedia after the amount of times you've left, but when you start disturbing people who actually are trying to contribute to the project, I do.
They're ill-informed. I'm willing to e-mail you some history — you know, facts and diffs — if you're willing to swear on the bible that you're interested in them, and willing to take the time to read them (it'll take quite some time). Very likely you're not, and in that case it's hardly worth my trouble. Bishonen | talk17:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC).[reply]
No its ok, thanks for the offer though. Even if I read them and provided a profound and well articulated instrospection reminiscent of Twain, Frost or Thoreau, anything I added to the discussion would be disregarded and criticized to pieces so there is no reason for you to waste your time.
“
Be respectful to your superiors...if you have any. --Mark Twain
@Jehochman: Just so you know, that IP you blocked for being me, wasn't me. So now you are blocking IP's who are innocent and accusing them of being me. 138.162.8.58 (talk) 21:38, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose we'll see how it turns out
@Resolute: I suppose we'll see how the vote turns out. It certainly seems to be in your favor. Of course its pretty easy to change IP's and there are a lot of hotspots in DC wiht free internet. 138.162.8.59 (talk) 21:39, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As much as I don't care to play whack-a-mole, we both know that unless you effect a serious change in attitude, your socks will be caught and blocked. It isn't like you are suggesting a groundbreaking strategy for ban evasion here. In truth, Kumioko, all you are accomplishing now is to further undermining any point you were trying to make. If you actually did care about improving things here, you would realize that firing up ban-evading socks would simply defeat your own cause. You would, in fact, prove everyone you view as an enemy to be right. Your comments now smack of impotent rage. IMO, you are probably better off just taking six months off and deciding then if you feel the desire to return. Resolute21:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Resolute:You know there are 2 problems with what you are saying. First, its not "my cause" I was trying to help improve the project. Second, I was totally dedicated to the project and you all destroyed that by showing me how truly ugly this place is. 131.171.81.79 (talk) 00:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
So I guess you don't really care you blocked innocent editors and accused them of being me
@AGK: So it appears that you don't care that you blocked a half dozen editors and accused them of being me. I think you need to run the checkuser tool again for the last couple weeks. You might be able to block a lot more innocent editors just to prove how far you are willing to go just to be rid of me and my criticism of Arbcom and admins. 138.162.8.58 (talk) 21:41, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello 138.162.8.59. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Paradiving".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paradiving}}, paste it in the edit box at , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to USS Mahan (DDG-72), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Widr (talk) 17:04, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, 138.162.8.59. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:
avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Please read Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest guidelines before editing any articles related to the United States military or government to ensure you are in compliance. Thank you - theWOLFchild17:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
X
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du die Website weiter nutzt, gehe Ich von Deinem Einverständnis aus.OKNeinDatenschutzerklärung
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
Hello, 138.162.8.59. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please: