To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

13:31, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
MalnadachBot (talk · contribs)

---

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Chlorophyll a with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 11:09, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to List of Germans. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SpinningSpark 00:29, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Actually, since you deleted the previous warnings I guess you must have read them and are now deliberately ignoring them. SpinningSpark 00:35, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Dinesh D'Souza, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 07:47, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page The Spoonman do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here to The Spoonman was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://spoonmanatfs.wordpress.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:43, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at History of Korea, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SpinningSpark 09:47, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page The Spoonman, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you.
Your edit here to The Spoonman was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://spoonmanatfs.wordpress.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:45, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alt-J (∆). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Amp71 (talk) 02:52, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Talk:Nicki Minaj, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLP applies to any page of Wikipedia, either artcicles or Wikipedia space; about biographies or not. At the top of the article this message appears: "even if it is not a biography". The material is contentious and unsourced. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:05, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems interesting that my comment was specifically about the fact that even though this topic is all over the internet, no mention at all is contained within the talk pages, let alone the article. Your reverting of that comment exactly answers my question, doesn't it? Why didn't you ask for sources, anyway?137.111.13.200 (talk) 05:11, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Marechal Ney. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to C. Wright Mills because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Marechal Ney (talk) 02:50, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently made an edit to George H. Gay, Jr. that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jim1138 (talk) 23:43, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Morgellons". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 03:32, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, you're getting this message as you are involved in a case at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard which is currently open. Today DRN has undergone a big move resulting in individual cases on subpages as opposed to all the content on one page. This is to inform you that your case is now back on the DRN board and you will be able to 'watch' the subpage it's located on. Thanks, Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 13:16, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ginsuloft. An edit that you recently made to Economy of China seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ginsuloft (talk) 12:30, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dbrodbeck (talk) 13:23, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Internal rate of return without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Denisarona (talk) 09:28, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kkmurray. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kkmurray (talk) 02:02, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Natalie Glen, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:18, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tentinator. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Eastern Europe because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Tentinator   17:50, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thanks! We shall find more evidence of Western media's biased reports.Tiffany M-F Lee (talk) 08:09, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Problem-based learning has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:02, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Problem-based learning with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —John Cline (talk) 02:06, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did again to Problem-based learning with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 02:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Waiting for Godot, you may be blocked from editing. (Your four edits.) -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:06, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Vieque. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to BHP Billiton because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Vieque (talk • ctb) 03:23, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Box Hill, New South Wales. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:16, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rupert Murdoch, you may be blocked from editing. —John Cline (talk) 05:16, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to strontium, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ixfd64 (talk) 02:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit of the Adam Scott (golfer) article on 26 May 2014, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Melbourne3163 (talk) 05:26, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit of the Jason Day (golfer) article on 29 May 2014, has been reversed as the information is not notable enough for an encyclopedia and also contains POV information. Melbourne3163 (talk) 07:10, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm The Last Arietta. Your recent edit to the page Django Unchained appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TLA 3x ♭ → ♮ 07:54, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Steven Emerson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:52, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Turkish nationalism, unexplained removal of sourced content, has been reverted. Please use edit summaries. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:45, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Ben MacDui 11:55, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Movember— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 04:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 137.111.13.200. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Isabelle Cherry".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Isabelle Cherry}}, paste it in the edit box at , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 11:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Turkish people, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Alex2006 (talk) 10:31, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Inequation, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 01:54, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deidre Anderson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 14:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 137.111.13.200, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JSFarman (talk) 14:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Polymorphism (computer science)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 02:00, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Concorde. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - BilCat (talk) 07:47, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tony Abbott. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Wikiain (talk) 02:57, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Overpopulation— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 137.111.13.200. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Deidre Anderson".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:27, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added the picture to Karan Singh Grover as you requested. Note: Please put User talk page comments at the end of the talk page, not at or near the beginning. —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Gladamas. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Laurus nobilis— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 07:29, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]