Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)}  If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply.  14:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BalaM314. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sydney Electric Train Society without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please discuss large changes on the talk page. BalaM314 〘talk〙『π』 06:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no mistake. The reversion was deliberate. The page you have restored has many factual inaccuracies and needs to be rebuilt form the version I returned to. Eg the ownership of rolling stock items added in is wrong, the critism section is constructed to cause reputational damage. The tour section includes bus or train tours classification again to try to cause reputation damage tover a train group running bus tours. Basically the restored page is defamatory. The creators of the critical content are not publishing it in there own their names, they are seeking to be anonymous. There is no issue with relevant factual inclusions which occured prior to August 2003, but filling a public page with biased criticism and misinformation intended to cause reputational damage is an abuse of the principles of Wikipedia. Given these attacks of SETS the page either needs to be moved to ammendments by approval or locked with only admin access. 120.154.50.154 (talk) 07:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 not August 2003 120.154.50.154 (talk) 07:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're also using an anonymous account, so it seems a bit odd to criticize other editors for doing the same thing. --FPTI (talk) 14:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Legal threats. Thank you. The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1^{(The Garage)} 18:26, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]