Hi 舎利弗! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

were constuctive. I was told to remove these when I created the articles.--108.244.57.165 (talk) 19:25, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You were told? So is he no longer a player? 舎利弗 (talk) 19:27, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I put him at Julio Urías108.244.57.165 (talk) 19:48, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Carry on then. Apologies for the confusion. 舎利弗 (talk) 19:49, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 舎利弗. You have new messages at Ahnoneemoos's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Ahnoneemoos (talk) 23:02, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've blocked that user from editing their talk page (I should have done that in the first place). Thanks for noticing. Evil saltine (talk) 05:06, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you nominated Frate mario as nonsense. In fact, the article was not nonsense at all: it was perfectly meaningful Italian. I have deleted the article for a completely different reason, but you should avoid nominating articles for deletion for reasons that don't apply, as it may result in the nomination simply being declined. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:17, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thank you for reminding me. 舎利弗 (talk) 15:20, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see you want to move the Aspin its the proper name of the dog is see nothing wrong on it in fact it was in the wikibox names of it (By region).... but it is beter than the previous name of it which is very harsh to read ... but the main point .. its is the propper name of it approved by the PAWS. (A dog organization) . P.Andrew (talk) 05:06, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself with WP:UCN. Wikipedia prefers common names over official and "approved" names. Your personal tastes as for the name also does not count as valid argument. Thank you for understanding. 舎利弗 (talk) 02:07, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah... I think you must look to the References and Citations it is clear to the cites in made.. it is reliable please review it .... please don't bring the conflict here on wikipedia.. Wikipedia supposed to be a Knowledge and information Site... not a place for diplomatic protest Thanks <peace>. Oh sorry here P.Andrew (talk) 15:20, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot to sign, Philipandrew. All the references you added were from non-reliable sources. They do not count. Please read the deletion proposal rationale again. 舎利弗 (talk) 02:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC) here P.Andrew (talk) 15:20, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know copy-edit system.. i based it from the references of Laguna Copperplate Inscription it will have a discussion here not speedy.. and sorry i forgot to sign P.Andrew (talk) 15:20, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide independent, reliable sources that significantly cover that Tondo king to demonstrate his notability. 舎利弗 (talk) 02:51, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well Ok shalìfu Thanks for reminding me of that i try to find it P.Andrew (talk) 15:20, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you nominated Torogan It has a Cited references An it had been trided to Deleted by the Admin but they find out it was reliable Again you should look for footnotes if it was non-reliable , You should delete the article that i Derived my Sources!

..P.Andrew (talk) 12:20, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs do not count as reliable sources. Please read WP:RS. 舎利弗 (talk) 04:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see Again and you calling me a Problematic user?? its ok to add your deleting tags just make sure you checked nor review its sites P.Andrew (talk) 04:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did not understand what you were trying to convey. If it would make it easier, speak in Tagalog instead. 舎利弗 (talk) 05:13, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

...just make sure you checked nor review its footnotes and the cites Don't forget P.Andrew (talk) 04:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me you're still not reading WP:RS and WP:GNG. You will understand very well why your articles have been nominated for deletion if you only slightly understood those two policies. Have a nice day. 舎利弗 (talk) 05:25, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes .. That's why i have some revision on to it...same to you bro P.Andrew (talk) 04:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No I am not an admin. Again, if it would make it easier, please speak in Tagalog. I failed to understand what you're trying to say. 舎利弗 (talk) 03:36, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pinag uusapan palang yung pangalan . kaya maari mo pang ma revert ito... (talk) 11:17, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

..And Why you are Suddenly china become interested to me last time? eh?... (talk) 11:17, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But i will thank you if you do some Improvements to these articles..(talk) 11:17, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kung naniniwala kang hindi angkop ang pangalan ng pahinang iyon sa kasalukuyan, maari mo namang idulong ang iyong mungkahi doon. Kapag sumang-ayon ang ibang users, saka lang siya dapat palitan ng pangalan.

That's a cute name, "china." :)) It's simple really. I believe you're not contributing anything positive to Wikipedia. I've been watching your every move since then. 舎利弗 (talk) 03:49, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please make the Header just the Natural name of it like the Sato....User:Philipandrew(talk) 11:17, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What "natural name" are you talking about? As for Sato (dog), it's named that way because there are many other pages named Sato. 舎利弗 (talk) 04:20, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I mean..Askall, or Aspin was more Natural and more Encyclopedic and it is the proper name to it .. i suggest .. and i only Add a little positive facts in some articles which is have a lack of Data/ information or some articles that have been biased or un-reliable (like the Askal) i added some information which is leaved blank. . . P.Andrew (sgd) (talk) 11:17, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The page is already named askal. I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. And now I'm telling you this very frankly: you're not helping. Please familiarize yourself first with policies, and improve your command of the language. 舎利弗 (talk) 04:33, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• sigh* eto na..(Mag ta-Tagalog na ako) Kayo ang bahala ..Ang sinasabi ko lang.... Kung may babaguhin lang naman kayo to the articles i have been Created...Please improve it.. yan po ang lagi kong sinasabi sa mga User... Ok Siya po May gagawin pa ako (Enrollment for High-school) Have a nice day ! P.Andrew (sgd) (talk) 11:17, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Next time, please consider placing your edits into a sandbox (test page) under your namespace (e.g., User:Philipandrew/sandbox). No one will nominate your edits for deletion or bug you about not following policy if you place them inside your own sandboxes. Now when you've done that, feel free to consult anyone who might be interested in the topic you're writing about, so that he may edit your work if you've convinced him enough to do it. Only place your edits into the mainspace (i.e., real articles) when they're ready. Another suggestion of mine is consider seeking adoption, so that someone who's patient enough could mentor you through the process. I would like to clarify that I do not bear anything personal against you. I do believe that you have the passion to make Wikipedia better. But mere passion or desire to make something better won't do it. 舎利弗 (talk) 04:55, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok isee Sandbox and ..You just doing your Job as an Editor, i do not take it Personaly because i learn from it 舎利弗 At least you made some improvements. And have a nice day  :)) P.Andrew (sgd) (talk) 11:31, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad we have settled this in a friendly manner. 舎利弗 (talk) 04:44, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think that "2008 GMMSF Box-Office Entertainment Awards" is not notable enough that you redirected it? Thanks! 001Jrm (talk) 08:21, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Oh, and all the other awards as well. 001Jrm (talk) 08:24, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You tell me. Please provide independent, reliable sources that significantly cover the award for that year. Passing mentions do not count. The sources must significantly cover (i.e., provide commentary and establish notability) the award for that particular year itself, otherwise it does not have notability independent of the award itself. I would suggest you build on improving the many issues that the parent article has first and work from there. Quality over quantity please. 舎利弗 (talk) 08:26, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to get at least 1 reliable reference of that year for each year to cover for the winners list, date and place of the event. The other two is for introducing the award-giving body. You do know (or at least that's what I think) that looking for past references in the Philippines is difficult. In addition, GMMSF does not even have its own website (or articles related to them), which makes it more difficult. Would you prefer to just list the winners instead, just like the other pages that I saw?(rhetoric question) Also, I am planning to improve the main page, after I finish ALL of the years. How would I know what to put on the main page if I do not research on each year first? It's just like collecting ideas, researching for bits of information (each year) before creating an actual essay (parent page). If ever the information on each page is not enough, you could at least put some other tags to improve the article rather than redirect it right away as it "could plausibly be expanded into an article" WP:R#DELETE; to "Consider whether the article could be improved..." WP:BEFORE Speaking of independent, reliable sources, the current year, 2014, has it. :) 001Jrm (talk) 09:01, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
PS: I will respond to your reply later since I have to sleep now. (It's 5am here) I hope you reconsider it.

As I've said, I redirected the pages because I don't think they are independently notable. It has nothing to do with the content or lack thereof. Providing one reference may not be enough to fulfill WP:GNG. What is needed is significant coverage, from multiple, reliable, independent sources to establish independent notability. I know that is hard, especially with the Philippine web, but 'tis the sad fact of systemic bias. Anyway, if you still think otherwise, you may forward this concern to the Philippines workgroup so we could see what other editors think about it. Again, I would recommend focussing on the parent article instead and then working from there. Have a nice rest, and I hope we can work together in a future opportunity. 舎利弗 (talk) 09:11, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll just forward my concern to the Philippines workgroup. I would focus on the parent article for now, just like what you recommended. If ever I finished improving it, however, would you take into consideration to undo your edit on the independent pages so that I can improve on those years as well? It's just that I want all the winners throughout the years to be documented (before the main source will be deleted), and adding all of them in one page is too much. Thanks for your comments and have a great weekend! :) 001Jrm (talk) 04:05, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Torogan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lanao (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Krishna Savjani. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 13:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. I missed a few things but I'll get better. JacobiJonesJr (talk) 19:06, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 舎利弗. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of My Midnight Heart, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Being or having been member of a notable band indicates importance/significance. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 19:10, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Napansin ko lang na May Nailagay kang Deletion tag" sa isa sa file ko ,... hindi ko sinasabing isang historical Artifact or pieces yon... Gusto ko lang ipakita kung ano ang Silabaryo ng tagalog (i-enhance that article with an Reliable references) ... wala akong claim na Historical" yung file parang pag-papakita lang yun isang forgoten-script (at naging Useful naman) So ..Kailangan ko ba dito ng Specified na License para hindi ito ma delete?? (Philipandrew (sgd) 07:05, 25 May 2014 (UTC))

Tinag sila hindi dahil sa imbalidong lisensya kundi dahil wala silang ensiklopedikong gamit. Kunwari, sa Maka-Diyos, Maka-Tao, Makakalikasan at Makabansa nilagay mo doon ang isang imahe ng baybayin na sulat ng nasabing moto. Pero hindi naman siya importante para sa artikulong iyon. Una, ang imaheng iyong binigay ay hindi naman historikal; pero oo nga hindi mo naman sinabi na historikal nga iyon. Ngunit pangalawa, hindi naman naisulat kahit kailan sa baybayin ang motong iyan. Walang madaragdag sa matututunan ng mambabasa kapag nakita niya yung imahe ng baybayin na iyon. May ilang beses din na ginawa mo ang katulad na bagay sa ibang artikulo, halimbawa sa The Prayer (Celine Dion and Andrea Bocelli song), kaya naman naiintindihan mo na agad itong inalis ng ibang user at ang kaugnay na imahe ay agad ding dinilit. Ang mga baybayin na imahe ay yusful lang sa baybayin na artikulo mismo, pero sa kaso naman noon mas maganda kung magbibigay ka ng mga historikal na paggamit ng baybayin, imbis na mga sariling gawa. Karaniwan, maganda lang gamitin ang mga imahe na ganyan kung balak mong ipakita sa mambabasa kung ano ang hitsura nung mismong letra.

Gusto mo ba bigla na lang mag-upload ang mga Tsino ng sarili nilang gawa na mga imahe ng mga sulat Instik sa artikulong The Prayer (Celine Dion and Andrea Bocelli song)? Syempre hindi, kundi wala nang katapusang magsisiaplowd ang bawat lahi ng sarili nilang imahe ng lengwahe nila sa nasabing artikulo. Hindi natin gusto iyon dahil hindi iyon nakakatulong sa pagpapaintindi sa mambabasa ng nilalaman ng artikulo. Sa parehong rason, kaya hindi, sa tingin ko, angkop para sa Wikipedia ang mga inaplowd mo.

Maari mo naman iapila sa angkop na pahina na hindi siya burahin kung naniniwala ka na mali ang pananaw ko ukol sa mga larawan mo. Pero hindi ko ginagarantiya na didinggin ng adminstrador bilang sapat ang irarason mo.

舎利弗 (talk) 07:29, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Friend sana, Kung maari ,ay Yun sa The Prayer ang mai-delete dahil yun ang file na inacurate, kaya nga nilagyan ko {{db-f9. kaso May nag revert. Ngunit yung sa Lupang Hinirang kase hahanapan ko pa yan ng Specific Licence .at clean-up para hindi mabura.. ganon din ang mga Aritcles ok so do i have more time Ok have a nice day Attila :)) (Philipandrew (sgd) 04:25, 26 May 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Mukhang hindi mo naintindihan ang sinabi ko. Inuulit ko: walang kinalaman ang imbalidong lisensya sa nominasyon sa pagbura ng mga larawan mo; walang magagawa ang paghahanap ng mas angkop na lisensya o pagpapalit ng lisensya sa magiging pasya ng administrador. Kaya ninomina para burahin ang mga larawan mo ay dahil wala silang ensiklopedikong halaga. Sa ibang salita, walang matututunan ang mamambasa sa mga larawan na nilagay mo. Halimbawa, ano naman ang saysay ng paglalagay ng File:Lupang hinrang in Baybayin notes.jpg sa Lupang Hinirang eh hindi naman iyan historikal na dokumento; ikaw lang ang gumawa niyan; at ni isang beses ay hindi naman isinulat ang Lupang Hinirang sa baybayin para sa opisyal o iba pang mahalagang pangyayari? Ipaliwanag mo nga. 舎利弗 (talk) 22:45, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Attila, I get your point, but its my Self-published' because it noting doubt its just an Example of Baybayin sentencesbut i yuse the national anthem (Philipandrew (sgd) 11:18, 28 May 2014 (UTC))[reply]

A friend can i like call you Attila but no offense , I like to call you just a friendly code name :)) cheers! (Philipandrew (sgd) 11:24, 28 May 2014 (UTC))

Sure, call me however you want it, friend. I am afraid though that I didn't understand what you're trying to say here:

I get your point, but its my Self-published' because it noting doubt its just an Example of Baybayin sentencesbut i yuse the national anthem

Do you mean to suggest that you were right to include the image in the article? 舎利弗 (talk) 08:08, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit you restored a deletion proposal (PROD) which had been removed by the editor who created the article. However, PROD is only for uncontroversial deletions. If anyone removes a PROD, it is not uncontroversial, so the PROD must not be removed, except under circumstances where the removal was clearly not intended as contesting the deletion. If you think the article should be deleted, you will have to take it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:08, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I'm sorry for that oversight. I confused the policy on speedy tags with those on PROD tags. I will see to it that this will not happen again. Regards, 舎利弗 (talk) 18:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I just want to let you know that I already got the permission to have separate pages for the GMMSF...awards as seen here. Thanks in advance! :) 001Jrm (talk) 20:26, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page User talk:55go in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 23:11, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

where you are coming from suggesting Lonely Planet Indonesia for deletion - it is one of about 3 or 4 titles that are essential for understanding the tourist industry in Indonesia - and also the information about the country. Not sure why you need to have a deletionist attitude to something like that. satusuro 15:16, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate if you directed these comments to the deletion nomination page so that discussion may be centralized. Please be ready to present third-party references that have significant coverage of the book itself to establish notability. All other arguments are irrelevant. 舎利弗 (talk) 15:25, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]