You have been blocked temporarily from editing for WP:NOTHERE. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  User:Ymblanter (talk) 05:41, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On a second though, I opened a topic about this block at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Indefinite block of Валко per NOTHERE--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: and how can I communicate there if you blocked me? Валко (talk) 13:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can not, but other people (including those who read your talk page) can.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:50, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nosebagbear: I will answer all questions, show sources and documents. I'm not a vandal. Валко (talk) 13:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nosebagbear, El C, and Ymblanter: Great Russian encyclopedia: created national-state. Education within the framework of the RSFSR: the Volga Germans Labor Commune (10.19.1918), the Autonomous Bashkir Soviet Republic (03.20.1919), the Autonomous Tatar Socialist Soviet Republic (05.5.1920), the Karelian Labor Commune (8.6.1920), the Chuvash Autonomous Okrug (24.6. 1920) and others.

decision ru:Арбитраж:Игнорирование АИ Despite the absence of a detailed analysis of the authority of sources in the discussions, a wider recognition of 1919 as the year of foundation of the Bashkir Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (albeit under a different name and in a smaller territory) was shown in these discussions.

under a different name and in a smaller territory. I suggest as in the article Turkestan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (initially, the Turkestan Socialist Federative Republic

The Bashkir Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (initially, the Autonomous Bashkir Soviet Republic) [1] and [2] [3] Валко (talk) 13:46, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: You said that I was not a vandal. Then why blocked? Валко (talk) 13:46, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nosebagbear:, I’m not promoting anything, it’s well known, but for some reason they want to hide it. The Republic was formed under the name Bashkir Soviet Republic User talk:Ezhiki#User Валко and his original researches on the Bashkortostan topics Валко (talk) 18:13, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nosebagbear: 20 марта 1919 года в результате подписания “соглашения Центрального Советского правительства с Башкирским правительством о Советской Автономной Башкирии” автономия Башкур-Дистан была признана центральными властями и преобразована в башкирскую Советскую Республику (БСР), а также в Автономную башкирскую Советскую Республику (АБР) [13]. ru:Башкирская Автономная Советская Социалистическая Республика#Официальные названия республики, So what's the problem? Валко (talk) 14:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nosebagbear: so under what name was the republic formed? Валко (talk) 13:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nosebagbear:, Unlock I'm not a vandal Валко (talk) 05:26, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging me isn't helpful - it's now a majority of the community that decides, not any individual admin. I'm not changing from my position, because I'm still concerned you seem so focused on proving your point that you're not engaging with the specific concerns raised. And you were never stated to be a vandal. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:49, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nosebagbear:, I do not have my point of view. I rely on the sources Agreement of the Central Soviet power with the Bashkir Government on the Soviet Autonomous Bashkiria.

And I don’t see the community deciding something Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Indefinite block of Валко per NOTHERE Валко (talk) 14:01, 13 June 2020 (UTC) Volga German Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic when is it formed? or Kazakh Autonomous Socialist Soviet Republic Валко (talk) 14:52, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Валко (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was never told why I was blocked Валко (talk) 08:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes you were, in the notice above, and in the block log. 331dot (talk) 10:25, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

They didn’t explain to me for what, 331dot Валко (talk) 10:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they did, you were blocked for not being here to build an encyclopedia. The block log further explains "Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia: the user is here to promote theor own historical theories and, judging from theit indefblocks at another projects, the earlier this gets stopped the better". 331dot (talk) 10:38, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is obvious to whom? 331dot, Check all my contributions, everything and always only by sources. I think I'm being followed Валко (talk) 15:29, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to make another request. 331dot (talk) 15:34, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]