Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vrxces were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Currently not in a state to enter mainspace as it broadly doesn't conform to the manual of style and may not be notable. Happy to provide more specific feedback, but the key things that stand out are that: (1) the article lacks significant coverage, particularly review coverage, from reliable video game sources, given the two reviews cited are considered unreliable; (2) there's a fairly high-amount of references to and citations from user-generated coverage, such as YouTube interviews, reviews and features, which are generally not considered reliable coverage, at least not to substantiate notability; (3) there's a smidge of non-neutral writing and promotional tone to this that suggests authorship from someone affiliated with the game, namely the sheer amount of specific details about the tables and company and; (4) generally a lack of citations for large aspects of the article. Happy to chat more about this on my talk page if you need guidance.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pinball FX and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wilbers! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinball FX (2023 video game), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 21:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Addams Family (pinball), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 13:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jaws (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've added a citation for the release date of Pinball FX. There is already one in there about the table itself from the FX3 release. Also, as to changing the number of pieces in the Lego set (I only noticed that by chance as I read about it a few weeks ago) from 1,500 to 1,497, the correct number is shown in a photo of the box that is in https://www.ign.com/articles/lego-ideas-jaws-set-is-now-available so don't think that needs a second source, but if it does then there is the Lego site itself https://www.lego.com/en-gb/product/jaws-21350. Wilbers (talk) 00:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was working on a page for this game awhile ago here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Pinball_FX_(2022_video_game) I had no idea you created a page.Wikieditor9117 (talk) Wikieditor9117 (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, someone happened to ask just before Christmas on the pinball FX discord why there wasn't a Pinball FX Wikipedia page so between 3 of us we made one. I didn't see your draft before I started on it. Can't see anything in it to copy to the published article, but still should be able to improve it a little more over time. First time I've done more than a trivial edit, so its been a learning process. Wilbers (talk) 23:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah the page I created was pretty bare bones. I really only wanted to create a chart listing all the tables and updating it whenever a new table became available. I was hoping other editors would have contributed to the page but since you guys created a page, my draft is no longer needed.Wikieditor9117 (talk) 15:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing. Do you think we should add a tables chart to the Pinball M paragraph under "Related Games"? Like this

^fx Original version of table from Pinball FX

Because I don't know if Pinball M will get it's own article.Wikieditor9117 (talk) 19:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've put Pinball M in its own section now, because I also think Pinball M doesn't need a separate article at this time. Can you add that table in, but to keep it consistent with the long table make the columns Table, [second column called License or IP or something instead of collection - not sure what the best thing to call it is], third column date of release, and the fx note could be in the table column after the name, but with the note saying Table also released in Pinball FX or something like that - given that 2 were released at the same time rather than afterwards.

Will also need a bit about reception after the table, and bit about development and what it is before it, but these can be gradually added. Wilbers (talk) 13:17, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added the chart but I don't know the release dates of the games so I left that section blank. If you know the dates could you add them to the chart?Wikieditor9117 (talk) 14:13, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've filled the dates in. Wilbers (talk) 15:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]