Revirvlkodlaku, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...  YOU'RE WELCOME! It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! MSAOM (talk)

15:39, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

	The Minor barnstar
	Thank you for helping update and add short descriptions to Wikipedia articles. With your help, we have cleared the WikiProject's top 3000 list for the second month in a row! Your work has made Wikipedia better. Keep it up, and happy holidays! LR.127 (talk) 02:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LR.127, thank you so much for my very first barnstar, this is super exciting for me!!!🥳🥳🥳

Happy holidays to you as well! Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 03:58, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but shouldn't Chinese Tartary be mentioned? Doug Weller talk 13:47, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Doug Weller, please contextualize your question better. What are you asking me about Chinese Tartary? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 00:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I should have said Tartarian Empire. Before you edited it, the lead said ", as well as areas in present Mongolia, China, and the Russian Far East in "Chinese Tartary"- which was wikilinked. I can't see any justification for removing it.. Doug Weller talk 10:56, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller, right, I see what you mean now. Chinese Tartary seems to be an archaic geographic term, and in the context where it was used, "and the Russian Far East in "Chinese Tartary", it didn't make sense to me. Do you think it contributes anything of value to the sentence, or the context? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:57, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On further reflection, I would say it belongs as a see also. Doug Weller talk 15:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller, I'm not sure it's all that relevant to the topic, but I won't object if you decide to add it to See also. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 16:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think I will. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 16:09, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Added it as "Chinese Tartary, an archaic geographical term" Doug Weller talk 16:12, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David - I see we both made changes to this article today. I just wanted to check that you intended to add a tag to the Early Life & Education section that it "may be too technical for most readers to understand". It seems very straightforward to me, so I wanted to check with you.

Thanks Blackballnz (talk) 07:57, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Blackballnz, thanks for checking. I added the tag intentionally, as I found the terms "open exhibition" and "first-class degree" to be unclear to most readers without a British background. I suppose I could have tagged them individually though. Instead, would you be able to clarify them in the section? Cheers! Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 08:29, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Revirvlkodlaku, I'll have a look and see if I can make these clearer. Blackballnz (talk) 22:27, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I've added a link from first class degree to the British undergraduate degree page article. I've also changed 'open exhibition' to 'place'. Open exhibition seems quite complicated to explain. I'll take the tag off now & I think the article is better than it was a couple of days ago. Blackballnz (talk) 08:03, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Blackballnz, that's perfect, cheers! Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 15:11, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Revirvlkodlaku, your revert here didn't actually effect anything for those who don't use Android. My edit was just to make that wikipedia page should start with introduction, not direct three photos. I think your last 2 or 3 days edits or improvising made this look little odd for Android people. so i did a copyedit. before February, it was perfect for both Android and others users. i hope you got my point.
Kind regards. Callmehelper (talk) 03:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Callmehelper, I do see what you mean, and thank you for explaining. In future, I would just ask that you use an appropriate edit summary, as yours ("ce") was misleading. Revirvlkodlaku (talk)

Hello - to answer your question on the history of Romani people page - yes, Gypsy Rehabiliation Centre was an official name by the Government - which is shocking, but true. That's why it should be capitalised. Thanks!

diffhist History of the Romani people 15:46 0 Revirvlkodlaku talk contribs (Undid revision 1275318795 by Alfeverett (talk) Why capitalize? Was it a proper name?) Tag: Undo thank Alfeverett (talk) 13:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Alfeverett, got it, thanks for explaining! Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 17:18, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since you so despise templates…

for info, your edit summaries (like at East Coast Main Line) are in Czech again. Danners430 (talk) 19:46, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Danners430, no need for further snark—all of these incidents likely happened at the same time, and I'm now aware of the problem. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 00:28, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Revirvlkodlaku. You have just reverted an edition done by me. I put "Alphabet", just because the infobox states that Sorang Sompeng is an "alphabet". And that's it. Could you please further explain if Sorang Sompeng is an alphabet or not? That would be very nice of you. Regards, Fadesga (talk) 10:17, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Fadesga, I see now that the infobox says alphabet, but I'm not sure why that is. As you may know, an alphabet is a particular type of script, and as far as I can tell, the Sorang Sompeng script doesn't meet that description. To be clear, I'm not a linguist, but unless this is convention as far as the infobox is concerned, I think it shouldn't say alphabet. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:11, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]